Topic: here you have it economists speak against bitcoin (Read 1270 times)
well we bitcoin investors have heard these things over and over again but then we know bitcoin has great potentials which are far beyond what they analyze, we will buy more and hodl. bitcoin will sure grow stronger in time coming
I think economists can not be against crypto currency. Yes, some economists can be against Bitcoin. Because Bitcoin is an independent platform. It can not be controlled by any country or government. Because of which some countries are also against Bitcoin.
The conflicts and critics has always existed it part of development. Even people that doesn't have an idea of what cryptocurrency is all about would still contribute in the critics.
These economists should leave bitcoin alone. They should take time to talk more about the downside of fiat currencies. I won't need to bother myself with this kind of negatively because it can never change my belief regarding what bitcoin is capable of achieving.
Economists always observe and comment on bitcoin from the negative side, that is, bitcoin is anonymous. Always associated with money laundering, terrorist funding and even drug businesses. While the positive side of bitcoin is rarely discussed. Observers forget that the digital age has arrived, and bitcoin places itself as a digital currency, where transactions are easier and more convenient.
I don't really think his comments are important, we can see that JP Morgan has said the same thing and in secret they also want to accumulate bitcoin in any way. But there is one point indeed if everyone has the same rights without interference and capitalist policy, then greed and monopoly will dominate, bitcoin must continue to be progressive to prevent this from happening.
Now quite a lot of people talk about bitcoin skeptical things and promote this skepticism. But there are also many significant figures in the economy who speak positively about it. So you are free to decide whether you believe in cryptocurrency or not.
It is a pity that such people have a negative opinion about bitcoin, since they have the opportunity to spread this skeptical opinion widely enough, and many people believe that. In fact, there is nothing wrong with bitcoin. If it is good to study it, it is possible to verify this.
It's great that these economists have their own view on bitcoin. But I would not call their opinion convincing. I will still continue to use bitcoin and develop, as well as invest my money in it and advise others to do it.
https://www.ccn.com/bitcoin-mining-threatens-our-existence-academic-says-calls-for-intervention/
economists from qatar publicly speak out against bitcoin and its destructive nature,
as i told you in threads before the conflict will come
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.43124804
These economists say most of these things without paying attention to details of how Bitcoin functions. Most of them do not even know much about Bitcoin but rather following the false news and articles some people write about Bitcoin and crypto. economists from qatar publicly speak out against bitcoin and its destructive nature,
as i told you in threads before the conflict will come
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.43124804
From the fundamental principles of economy, we all know that any good way of establishing more jobs and offering financial freedom helps the economy of that country and this is what Blockchain and Bitcoin do.
Everything has two sides of it, so in the bitcoin there are people who support it, there will be people who oppose it, those who hate will continue to hate, and those who like it will continue to like.
It's kinda stupid to be trying to run against the progress, classic economists and banksters would be better themselves if they were focusing on their own job rather then criticize Bitcoin
It appeared because there was a need for it, or in other words, Bitcoin is simply a product of demand. Deal with it.
Just to note, I'm not pro-crypto, I just don't like the idea of fighting over meaningless matters
It appeared because there was a need for it, or in other words, Bitcoin is simply a product of demand. Deal with it.
Just to note, I'm not pro-crypto, I just don't like the idea of fighting over meaningless matters
The first time I see this man, I don't think I'm going to listen to the upstart who's trying to hypothesize that he's very smart, but he looks stupid.
Most of these economists are politicians who speak mostly from a government point of view. They are only interested in painting btc black to the people to decline their interest in btc investment but you see, some of similar articles couldn't bring down btc so we aint bothered
It's time for the government to replace their gold hoard with bitcoins.
Are the governments still sitting in huge amounts of gold? I was under the impression they were selling all the gold they had so they could keep the price of gold down and keep the farce that is the economy for a longer amount of time, and if they began buying bitcoin this will help us since the price will skyrocket, so I do not see how they can do something and not help bitcoin in the process. 
https://www.ccn.com/bitcoin-mining-threatens-our-existence-academic-says-calls-for-intervention/
economists from qatar publicly speak out against bitcoin and its destructive nature,
as i told you in threads before the conflict will come
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.43124804
I am in bitcoin field since a year and if personally speaking then I never feel like bitcoin to be destructive in nature as I also feel bitcoin to be very potentiating one as I also saw the people getting benefited by it and earning a lot through the bitcoin though there are some defect with the bitcoin and the foremost and the important one is its illegal use but it is no longer a defect as it could easily be resolved once it will get legalised all over the world and then from all the aspects bitcoin is only useful, there is nothing destructive in this. economists from qatar publicly speak out against bitcoin and its destructive nature,
as i told you in threads before the conflict will come
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.43124804
These economists should leave bitcoin alone. They should take time to talk more about the downside of fiat currencies. I won't need to bother myself with this kind of negatively because it can never change my belief regarding what bitcoin is capable of achieving.
The economists also have bad ideas about bitcoin, which is quite logical, because the excessive development of bitcoin can threaten the survival of the bank, the government lost. control with financial background. However, the other worries can be solved with adjustments and improvements in bitcoin
It’s a manipulative opinion that could work with those people who don’t know anything about Bitcoin except its name. All their attention is paid to Bitcoin mining, while the production of fiats does more way harm to the environment. If we have a closer look at this issue, we will find that the problem is not in the high energy consumption but in the resources of energy
The fact that bitcoin spoils the environment-it's just ridiculous. There are a huge number of factors in the world that affect the environment even worse, but all these plants continue to operate. Therefore, you should not concentrate on the fact that bitcoin mining can seriously negatively affect the environment. It's stupid.
https://www.ccn.com/bitcoin-mining-threatens-our-existence-academic-says-calls-for-intervention/
economists from qatar publicly speak out against bitcoin and its destructive nature,
as i told you in threads before the conflict will come
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.43124804
Bitcoin is a cryptocurrency-it is mined. Yes, Yes - it is produced by material devices, that is, that can be touched. Such devices cost money, a lot of money, which means. economists from qatar publicly speak out against bitcoin and its destructive nature,
as i told you in threads before the conflict will come
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.43124804
Jump to: