Author

Topic: High reject rate for middlecoin? (Read 893 times)

legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
February 15, 2014, 01:32:03 AM
#12
Mine looks better now %6-7 thx
Try what cryptomining said and dropping your Intensity? I notice I get a lot more rejects at I:20 than I do at I:19, and even fewer at I:18. A 2% drop in hashrate is worth it if I drop from 5% to 2% rejects. That's still a 1% net gain.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
February 15, 2014, 12:31:17 AM
#11
Trying out the -E 10 -s 5 -Q 0 settings.  I'll post the results after a 24 hour sample period.
I tried these setting with my Gigabyte R9 270s and my reject rate today is under 1%, the best I've done previously was around 2.5%.
Glad I could help  Grin
Mine looks better now %6-7 thx
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
February 14, 2014, 09:05:15 PM
#10
Trying out the -E 10 -s 5 -Q 0 settings.  I'll post the results after a 24 hour sample period.
I tried these setting with my Gigabyte R9 270s and my reject rate today is under 1%, the best I've done previously was around 2.5%.
Glad I could help  Grin
full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 102
February 14, 2014, 02:45:05 PM
#9
Quote
Remember that these 120/60/1 defaults are for Bitcoin, which has a 10 minute block period, and the difficulty recalculates every ~12-14 days. Many alt-coins will have MUCH shorter block times, and recalculate the diff VERY quickly. If cgminer is working on a block for 60 seconds, and thinks that those shares are valid for 120 seconds, when in reality the new alt-coin network is finding a new block every 10 seconds, a lot of what you do is going to be invalid.

I had no idea to even consider this!

My reject rate on MC has been unacceptable high.  And i am running all 7950s / 270s @ -g 1.

Trying out the -E 10 -s 5 -Q 0 settings.  I'll post the results after a 24 hour sample period.

I tried these setting with my Gigabyte R9 270s and my reject rate today is under 1%, the best I've done previously was around 2.5%.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
February 14, 2014, 01:01:51 PM
#8
i lowered my intensity one,  helped with high rejects
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
February 14, 2014, 10:18:35 AM
#7
i have same problem nearly ,%20 rejects rate now.
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
February 13, 2014, 08:01:27 PM
#6
Quote
Remember that these 120/60/1 defaults are for Bitcoin, which has a 10 minute block period, and the difficulty recalculates every ~12-14 days. Many alt-coins will have MUCH shorter block times, and recalculate the diff VERY quickly. If cgminer is working on a block for 60 seconds, and thinks that those shares are valid for 120 seconds, when in reality the new alt-coin network is finding a new block every 10 seconds, a lot of what you do is going to be invalid.
I had no idea to even consider this!

My reject rate on MC has been unacceptable high.  And i am running all 7950s / 270s @ -g 1.

Trying out the -E 10 -s 5 -Q 0 settings.  I'll post the results after a 24 hour sample period.
Yep we edit those settings on all of our rigs. I think it results in higher network traffic, but it's pretty insignificant to begin with, so it's not an issue.

Let me know how that works out for you! For every 1% increase in rejects, it's basically a 1% drop in hashrate.
legendary
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
February 13, 2014, 03:53:18 PM
#5
Quote
Remember that these 120/60/1 defaults are for Bitcoin, which has a 10 minute block period, and the difficulty recalculates every ~12-14 days. Many alt-coins will have MUCH shorter block times, and recalculate the diff VERY quickly. If cgminer is working on a block for 60 seconds, and thinks that those shares are valid for 120 seconds, when in reality the new alt-coin network is finding a new block every 10 seconds, a lot of what you do is going to be invalid.

My reject rate on MC has been unacceptable high.  And i am running all 7950s / 270s @ -g 1.

Trying out the -E 10 -s 5 -Q 0 settings.  I'll post the results after a 24 hour sample period.
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
February 13, 2014, 03:23:53 PM
#4
On Middlecoin, our 280x rigs are usually ~1-3%, and our 290 rig is ~5-8%.

The 280xs run 2 threads at lower intensity, so I think it helps with the rejects. Any scenario where you're running one thread at high intensity will inherently have higher rejects, but usually the difference is tiny.

The problem is more pronounced with Middlecoin, because of the fact that you're switching coins so often. Many times, you may require new work every couple of seconds. You can tweak how often s/cgminer checks for new work with the "scan-time", "expiry", and "queue" configs.

See Con's original explanation for those settings:
Quote
--expiry|-E   Upper bound on how many seconds after getting work we consider a share from it stale (default: 120)
--scan-time|-s Upper bound on time spent scanning current work, in seconds (default: 60)
--queue|-Q    Minimum number of work items to have queued (0 - 10) (default: 1)

So your miner gets work from your pool. CGMiner thinks that work is valid for another 120 seconds (2 minutes), but will only spend 60 seconds working on it. After that, it moves onto a new set of work. The queue says we'll keep one extra set of work on backup, at all times.

Remember that these 120/60/1 defaults are for Bitcoin, which has a 10 minute block period, and the difficulty recalculates every ~12-14 days. Many alt-coins will have MUCH shorter block times, and recalculate the diff VERY quickly. If cgminer is working on a block for 60 seconds, and thinks that those shares are valid for 120 seconds, when in reality the new alt-coin network is finding a new block every 10 seconds, a lot of what you do is going to be invalid.

We can use this info to edit those parameters. We can set a lower value for all of those, so it's getting newer, valid work more often, and you're not wasting time hashing a block that's already been found. We use -E 30 -s 15 -Q 0, which works well on our 280x rigs, but not on our 290 rigs. I haven't gotten around to changing our 290 rig, but for you, I would try -E 10 -s 5 -Q 0, and see if that lowers your rejects.

TL:DR use this newer config:

Code:
"intensity" : "19",
"vectors" : "1",
"worksize" : "256",
"kernel" : "scrypt",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"auto-fan" : true,
"temp-cutoff" : "85",
"temp-overheat" : "80",
"temp-target" : "70",
"thread-concurrency" : "10239, 21568, 21568, 21568, 10239, 10239",
"api-port" : "4028",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"gpu-threads" : "1",
"gpu-engine" : "1120, 1025, 1100, 1100, 1120, 1125",
"gpu-memclock" : "1440, 1250, 1250, 1250, 1440, 1450",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"log" : "5",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"queue" : "0",
"scan-time" : "5",
"expiry" : "10",
"scrypt" : true,
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}
newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
February 13, 2014, 10:28:54 AM
#3
CPU: Sempron 145
MOBO: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3
GPUs: Gigabyte and Asus 270s
BAMT 1.3

Config:

Code:
"intensity" : "19",
"vectors" : "1",
"worksize" : "256",
"kernel" : "scrypt",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"auto-fan" : true,
"temp-cutoff" : "85",
"temp-overheat" : "80",
"temp-target" : "70",
"thread-concurrency" : "10239, 21568, 21568, 21568, 10239, 10239",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "120",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"gpu-threads" : "1",
"gpu-engine" : "1120, 1025, 1100, 1100, 1120, 1125",
"gpu-memclock" : "1440, 1250, 1250, 1250, 1440, 1450",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"log" : "5",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "60",
"scrypt" : true,
"shares" : "0",
"sharethreads" : "32",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}
sr. member
Activity: 840
Merit: 255
SportsIcon - Connect With Your Sports Heroes
February 13, 2014, 10:01:01 AM
#2
What is your CPU, MB, cards, OS, software running and miner config?

Use intensity 18 if gpu-threads=1

What's your ping to useast?

Then since these are coin-hopping pools, those 2 screenshots don't prove much. High reject rate can be coin dependent.
newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
February 13, 2014, 09:33:38 AM
#1
I've read that other people have higher reject rates on middlecoin, but this seems higher than most. Are there any settings I can change to lower the reject rate?

https://i.imgur.com/b5sEDUc.png
Jump to: