Topic: Hillary figured out how to Trump revenge for the defeat. (Read 794 times)
It will be best for Hillary to keep quiet. If she further provokes the president, then he will order the FBI to look in to her alleged links with the pedophile rings. He can also order an inquiry in to the Clinton body count.
Hillary and Kim Jong Un are planning something but I believe Trump is always one step ahead of them. Those crooks will end up in jail.
You just understand how much it will cost to steal Kim Jong Un from North Korea and imprison him in the US?! NK have 25 million zombies ready to sacrifice life to free their supreme leader! 
Hillary and Kim Jong Un are planning something but I believe Trump is always one step ahead of them. Those crooks will end up in jail.
I wonder you seriously think so or are you joking? In the elections said that Hillary's aggressive and start a war, and now rejoice as children from the fact that Trump launched a series of missiles on the Syrian airfield. Still has got nowhere. And what Kim do to Hillary? You obviously poisoned by Russian propaganda.
Shouldn't she be locked up already? Trump promised to put her and Bill behind bars. 
As for the resistance, there's always an opposition. If She's afraid of pressure and possible prosecution, this would be the perfect defense. If she ever gets attacked by Trump legally, she can go to the media and cry that he's trying to silence his critics.
As for the resistance, there's always an opposition. If She's afraid of pressure and possible prosecution, this would be the perfect defense. If she ever gets attacked by Trump legally, she can go to the media and cry that he's trying to silence his critics.
Hillary and Kim Jong Un are planning something but I believe Trump is always one step ahead of them. Those crooks will end up in jail.
I'll address the last point first because it's so critical. WE DONT NOT WANT CALIFORNIA TO SECEDE FROM THE UNION. They pretty much are the US GDP, our produce and tech products.
But if California votes for secession, you must accept it. Or join UK again to remove illegal secession precedent.As a moderate/progressive, although the thought of dropping some of the less productive (economically and sociopolitically speaking) makes me salivate. But, in the interest of representing the entire constituency, we have to offer equal representation despite contribution. If we are a community of equals, let all voices ring at the same volume. Representing only one class of citizen, as least as far as political ideology is concern, breeds the path for taxation without representation. And as history has proven, shit gets burned down when we get there.
I didn't told to drop them. I mean let them go if they wish, the same as UK accepted US declaration of independence. 
What you are right of course, but the fact is that if the electoral system will work as you say, a few cities will make the decision for all of America. It's not quite right. As a financial center like new York can solve the problems of farmers of Texas? Therefore, the vote of a simple majority does not reflect the mood in society.
More honest would be votes based on GDP share. In this case progressive areas, consisting mostly of Silicon Valley, New York and Boston and will decide all US politics and leave no place for insane morons, who impose stupid legislation on creative people who contribute mostly in US prosperity.If Texas don't like, I think it can secede from the US, just like US seceded from the UK. According to the precedent legal system (common law) spirit, it must be absolutely legal.
I'll address the last point first because it's so critical. WE DONT NOT WANT CALIFORNIA TO SECEDE FROM THE UNION. They pretty much are the US GDP, our produce and tech products.
As a moderate/progressive, although the thought of dropping some of the less productive (economically and sociopolitically speaking) makes me salivate. But, in the interest of representing the entire constituency, we have to offer equal representation despite contribution. If we are a community of equals, let all voices ring at the same volume. Representing only one class of citizen, as least as far as political ideology is concern, breeds the path for taxation without representation. And as history has proven, shit gets burned down when we get there.
What you are right of course, but the fact is that if the electoral system will work as you say, a few cities will make the decision for all of America. It's not quite right. As a financial center like new York can solve the problems of farmers of Texas? Therefore, the vote of a simple majority does not reflect the mood in society.
More honest would be votes based on GDP share. In this case progressive areas, consisting mostly of Silicon Valley, New York and Boston and will decide all US politics and leave no place for insane morons, who impose stupid legislation on creative people who contribute mostly in US prosperity.If Texas don't like, I think it can secede from the US, just like US seceded from the UK. According to the precedent legal system (common law) spirit, it must be absolutely legal.
Be honest, Trump IS NOT a legally elected president, but an appointed one.
Hillary got 3 million votes more than Trump!
What you are right of course, but the fact is that if the electoral system will work as you say, a few cities will make the decision for all of America. It's not quite right. As a financial center like new York can solve the problems of farmers of Texas? Therefore, the vote of a simple majority does not reflect the mood in society.Hillary got 3 million votes more than Trump!
Be honest, Trump IS NOT a legally elected president, but an appointed one.
Hillary got 3 million votes more than Trump!
What you are right of course, but the fact is that if the electoral system will work as you say, a few cities will make the decision for all of America. It's not quite right. As a financial center like new York can solve the problems of farmers of Texas? Therefore, the vote of a simple majority does not reflect the mood in society. Hillary got 3 million votes more than Trump!
if the election was conducted based on the popular votes, then the Republican voters in deep blue states such as California and Maryland would have come out to vote rather than sitting at home.
It is just your opinion. No one knows how it would be.Not how the system is setup in america. For better or worse. And the democrats had many opportunities to attack the electoral college if they wanted and call for reforms. Lost twice because of it this century alone so they should. But they did nothing about it.
I said about legality, not that Trump is defacto president (you cannot do anything with it).Honestly, Electoral College, as well as Congress, Senate, Supreme Court and other U.S. federal government institutions are absolutely illegal. America had to follow all legal procedures to secede from the United Kingdom, which it hadn't (just self-proclaimed), so U.S. govt no more legal than L/DNR in the Ukraine. Only because US have powerful military forces other countries acknowledge US govt as legal and count L/DNR "illegal separatists".
Be honest, Trump IS NOT a legally elected president, but an appointed one.
Hillary got 3 million votes more than Trump!
Hillary got 3 million votes more than Trump!
First past the post is not the American way they use EC which is the good old electoral college.
Although I think MMP Mixed Member Proportional representation is likely the best system at the end of the day else the weight just goes to California and NYC.
http://www.macleans.ca/politics/making-sense-of-electoral-reform-what-are-canadas-options/
Next week Hillary will publish on the establishment of a new political force that will resist policy Trump. She's already decided on by the Board of Directors and the financing of their political power.
Probably more about trying to reassure the donors they will still take their money than resisting trump. And that the democrats won't fall to more progressive elements. Like sanders or keith ellison.
Be honest, Trump IS NOT a legally elected president, but an appointed one.
Hillary got 3 million votes more than Trump!
Hillary got 3 million votes more than Trump!
Not how the system is setup in america. For better or worse. And the democrats had many opportunities to attack the electoral college if they wanted and call for reforms. Lost twice because of it this century alone so they should. But they did nothing about it.
Be honest, Trump IS NOT a legally elected president, but an appointed one.
Hillary got 3 million votes more than Trump!
Hillary got 3 million votes more than Trump!
Your argument is wrong. As I have explained before, if the election was conducted based on the popular votes, then the Republican voters in deep blue states such as California and Maryland would have come out to vote rather than sitting at home.
Be honest, Trump IS NOT a legally elected president, but an appointed one.
Hillary got 3 million votes more than Trump!
Hillary got 3 million votes more than Trump!
Next week Hillary will publish on the establishment of a new political force that will resist policy Trump. She's already decided on by the Board of Directors and the financing of their political power.
Fighting back over what because she lost the election? She should give peace a space. Her power is in the media outside that she can stand with Trump in reality. If she fighting because of the masses in her country fine but if it is for her own interests just because of next election then bad.
Next week Hillary will publish on the establishment of a new political force that will resist policy Trump. She's already decided on by the Board of Directors and the financing of their political power.
Fighting back over what because she lost the election? She should give peace a space. Her power is in the media outside that she can stand with Trump in reality. If she fighting because of the masses in her country fine but if it is for her own interests just because of next election then bad.
Next week Hillary will publish on the establishment of a new political force that will resist policy Trump. She's already decided on by the Board of Directors and the financing of their political power.
Jump to: