Topic: Hodling tokens that deliver progress but have bad volume (Read 61 times)
Tokens are not so serious than coins, do not deny it, I support coins much more than token which are less stable and profitable from their determination.
Although I consider volume to be of great importance, projects that are meeting their goals and have a good real use deserve to be rewarded, so you can do your part and help them with marketing to get more investors, they also have to be active and put their tokens in all possible exchanges, so they have the opportunity to increase their volume exponentially.
I think the only way about for the team is to take on some damage and do some market making it is really crazy how the project progresses but the coin suffers.
About 80% of my tokens in my portfoli are same. No volume, evry low price, about 10 times cheaper than ICO price and still some updates so probably developers of the coins are active, but coin is not attractive 
.
.
I think that it is stupid to deny the fact of volume's importance. This characteristic is too significant and it plays far not the last role in choosing the project.
I am or have been hodling tokens for sometime now and some of those tokens have really good progress and have actually delivered what they promised. However the price and volume of the token is crappy. If you were in my shoes would you just dump or keep hodling. Considering the team is legit and is actually delivering; it is just the volume and price that is supppper crappy. the prices are like half the ICO price now and haven't moved an inch for like 6 months now.
Jump to: