Author

Topic: How a Fee-less Ecosystem Allows for True Privacy (Read 189 times)

member
Activity: 243
Merit: 18
February 25, 2019, 05:04:53 PM
#7
-Bump-

Let me know your thoughts and opinions.

and please read the blog before posting, it will answer most of your questions already
member
Activity: 243
Merit: 18
-Bump-

Would like to hear some thoughts on the matter.

Most whales that I know, don't care about it. Unless they do and raise concerns in a major way, no one is actually going to spend time thinking about it or even creating things that help.
And for the rest of us small traders that more frugal in nature, we'd trade in cryptos that allow darksend/mixing natively through their wallets.
Might as well stay in that small-coin market, push it a bit and then cash out.

You can't deny that they would have to care about the privacy part, even if whales use other blockchains they still won't be gaining 100% privacy.

Wouldn't cash out ever nor just push it a  bit because the project is more then just a privacy coin.

sure they would care about the fees if it saves them money why pay for something that doesn't work.

Have you even bother to ask "whales" because your just providing a opinion about you yourself as a small trader on what others would think.

Stop trolling to say that people wouldn't care about 100% privacy.
People will care about that and that's why most of while are using decentralized blockchain like bitcoin and monero to keep their privacy. People will care so much about that. One of the purpose from the blockchain to create a high privacy ecosystem.

Exactly, Scroda is to be a decentralized blockchain that is to offer more privacy than monero.

P.S just re-read your post and thank you for for showing some support  Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley
hero member
Activity: 1540
Merit: 507
-Bump-

Would like to hear some thoughts on the matter.

Most whales that I know, don't care about it. Unless they do and raise concerns in a major way, no one is actually going to spend time thinking about it or even creating things that help.
And for the rest of us small traders that more frugal in nature, we'd trade in cryptos that allow darksend/mixing natively through their wallets.
Might as well stay in that small-coin market, push it a bit and then cash out.

You can't deny that they would have to care about the privacy part, even if whales use other blockchains they still won't be gaining 100% privacy.

Wouldn't cash out ever nor just push it a  bit because the project is more then just a privacy coin.

sure they would care about the fees if it saves them money why pay for something that doesn't work.

Have you even bother to ask "whales" because your just providing a opinion about you yourself as a small trader on what others would think.

Stop trolling to say that people wouldn't care about 100% privacy.
People will care about that and that's why most of while are using decentralized blockchain like bitcoin and monero to keep their privacy. People will care so much about that. One of the purpose from the blockchain to create a high privacy ecosystem.
member
Activity: 243
Merit: 18
-Bump-

Would like to hear some thoughts on the matter.

Most whales that I know, don't care about it. Unless they do and raise concerns in a major way, no one is actually going to spend time thinking about it or even creating things that help.
And for the rest of us small traders that more frugal in nature, we'd trade in cryptos that allow darksend/mixing natively through their wallets.
Might as well stay in that small-coin market, push it a bit and then cash out.

You can't deny that they would have to care about the privacy part, even if whales use other blockchains they still won't be gaining 100% privacy.

Wouldn't cash out ever nor just push it a  bit because the project is more then just a privacy coin.

sure they would care about the fees if it saves them money why pay for something that doesn't work.

Have you even bother to ask "whales" because your just providing a opinion about you yourself as a small trader on what others would think.

Stop trolling to say that people wouldn't care about 100% privacy.
hero member
Activity: 1778
Merit: 764
www.V.systems
-Bump-

Would like to hear some thoughts on the matter.

Most whales that I know, don't care about it. Unless they do and raise concerns in a major way, no one is actually going to spend time thinking about it or even creating things that help.
And for the rest of us small traders that more frugal in nature, we'd trade in cryptos that allow darksend/mixing natively through their wallets.
Might as well stay in that small-coin market, push it a bit and then cash out.
member
Activity: 243
Merit: 18
-Bump-

Would like to hear some thoughts on the matter.
member
Activity: 243
Merit: 18
These days obtaining privacy is costly with tumblers charging anywhere from 1-5% of the funds being tumbled, yes that is a really big cut. Monero also charges for privacy in where users pay more for every other person included in the mixin of their funds. Tumblers and privacy coins leave you with a pretty big bill, while still failling to offer your 100% privacy.

Is it worth paying for privacy while your transactions can still be linked back to each other? No. Should you be paying for privacy in the first place when privacy is a given right in the USA under the fourth amendment? No.

Scroda aims to offer its users 100% privacy completly free, eliminating the need of having to pay thousands and thousands of dollars on privacy alone.

Read more below.

https://medium.com/@scroda/how-scrodas-fee-less-ecosystem-allows-for-true-privacy-5ec931725a26\

Unlike Monero, who mixes transactions of its users into a ring of transaction that includes other XMR transactions to attempt to lessen the ability of tracking the orginal sender of a specific(s) transaction. Scroda routes your funds through multiple different addresses in your possesion thus not requiring third parties, which is only possible through the use of Scroda’s fee-less eco-system.

P.S any posts that are off topic of the blog linked will be reported.
Jump to: