Topic: How about dao investors sold with losses? (Read 315 times)
I also think it is unfair to dao investors, if they did not allow us convert to eth with a fixed rate at that time, they should not do that now.
If they had a fixed conversion contract open there would not have been a market for it, as price would have been fixed and they prolly wanted to pump it and a fixed-rate-token is a bit of a stupid thing to pump so you remove that conversion option and suddenly it's pumpable. lel
You see how this thing isn't scientific at all and just a cheap ponzi-pump-machine? That DAO could have been run on free tokens too ... lol
But aparently it was better to pump lots of money in and drive it against the first wall. pahahah. Morons.
You see how this thing isn't scientific at all and just a cheap ponzi-pump-machine? That DAO could have been run on free tokens too ... lol
But aparently it was better to pump lots of money in and drive it against the first wall. pahahah. Morons.
I see dao can be converted to eth with 100:1 rate. It is unfair to dao investors who sold with losses, dao was below 1:100 rate after hitting on exchange. I remember the rate was 1:110 for a while(many weeks), and then the fiasco happened, many people sold dao with losses.
Now after the hard fork, they can convert dao to eth with 100:1 rate again? Why they didn't have this feature so that people could convert them to eth at that time(dao was 0.0034 per eth lowest on polo after the hack)? Only open this feature now? Anyone knows??
Now after the hard fork, they can convert dao to eth with 100:1 rate again? Why they didn't have this feature so that people could convert them to eth at that time(dao was 0.0034 per eth lowest on polo after the hack)? Only open this feature now? Anyone knows??
Jump to: