Author

Topic: How closely have you looked at the Taproot block? (Read 270 times)

legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 6080
Self-proclaimed Genius
... who could be behind such an enigma?
Someone who wanted to advertise their network by using a potentially historical bitcoin block.

But they messed up the arrangement of their OP_RETURN transactions and made a gibberish text art instead of the intended "ZN" (as seen in the reddit post).
If they have utilized CPFP to group the set of transactions together, it would have been mined with the correct arrangement and without any unrelated txns in between.
That's a takeaway that whoever did it isn't a seasoned Bitcoin~er.
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 6660
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
There is nothing special about activation blocks, precisely because they are arbitrarily chosen to be far in the future. So there cannot possibly be any surprise transactions inside that block unless some miner left some Easter egg OP_RETURN message in the coinbase transaction.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
This is kind of interesting. People have been putting ASCII art in OP_RETURN since 2011. There is all kinds of stuff in there that's not supposed to be, and its the same field that the Counterparty protocol uses to store its tokenization information (how Rare Pepes work).

... who could be behind such an enigma?

Seeing as how this happened almost a year ago already, I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess it was you  Cheesy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Len_Sassaman#Death

legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 10611
It should be added that this has nothing to do with Taproot either. They are using an OP code that existed from very early days of bitcoin called OP_RETURN to insert arbitrary data into the immutable and timestamped bitcoin blockchain.
People do things like this sometimes. For example someone once inserted their engagement date into bitcoin blockchain which will remain there forever.

The only connection with Taproot is that the block #709632 is the block where this soft-fork was activated at. So you can say it is a "popular" block!
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 6382
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
OK, so some people with a lot of time have made a bunch of taproot transactions writing stuff into their OP_RETURN.
I find the reddit (starting) post quite weak and supposing too much.

* I would say that one should look by the transacted values and make more than one list of OP_RETURN texts; there are more senders with more texts there.
* I would say that the order of those transaction may not matter, hence a reshuffle should look better (and the guy shuffling them did good).
* I would say that it would not be a surprise if other further blocks have such data, completing others' picture / messages
* It's not the first time I see blockchain / transaction used for advertising this or that

I see nothing special. As I said, people with too much time have pus texts there and made some transactions. And some wanted some odd advertising too. So what?
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1385

Ah, OK, indeed, interesting. I haven't seen that before.
But what exactly is your question - do you want to know who did it? Why they did it?

Look at the page: https://cirosantilli.com/cool-data-embedded-in-the-bitcoin-blockchain/ascii-art  - more interesting ASCII pictures.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 2
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1385
You misunderstand friend.

Did someone sign block 709 632 with ASCII art?

Do you talk about blue fish from https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/block/709632 ?

I think it is just a coincidence, all depends how browser interprets content of the page to be displayed, look at: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/blocks/btc/709632
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 2
You misunderstand friend.

Did someone sign block 709 632 with ASCII art?
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 2
How closely have you looked at the Taproot block?

... is there an easter egg hidden on there?

... does it relate to an entity looking to leverage Taproot?

... has this entity mirrored the BTC Ethos right from its genesis?

... who could be behind such an enigma?

Jump to: