Author

Topic: How could they have time to prepare Wtc7 to be pulled down? (Read 383 times)

legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
This picture has been on the Net ever since 9/11 happened. Finally it is making its way into the eyes and minds of loads of people.




BBC Reports 911, WTC 7 Collapse BEFORE it Happens = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=677i43QfYpQ


The Official Story of the Collapse of WTC Building 7 Lies in Ruins



This is the first scientific investigation of the collapse of the building.   Here is the conclusion:

"The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building."

Notice three things: (1) it has taken 18 years to get a real investigation of the destruction of a building blamed on Muslim terrorists, (2) the only way "near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building" can occur is through controlled demolition, and (3) this remarkable finding is not reported in the presstitute media.


Cool
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
Proof of the inside job on 9/11 is gradually coming out.


Study Proving "Definitively" That Fire Didn't Bring Down WTC Building 7 To Be Released



The idea that there were pre-planted explosives inside of the building is a thought that's been pondered by many families of victims, scientists, physicists, engineers, and many more. Franklin Square Fire Commissioner Christopher Gioia recently discussed his fire district's recent passage of a historic resolution supporting a new investigation into events of 9/11.

The latest news on 9/11 investigation progress comes from the University of Alaska Fairbanks, where professor and Chair of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Dr. Leroy Hulsey, will be releasing a new study proving "definitively," according to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth founder Richard Gage, that fire did not cause the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11.

This study has been in the works for a number of years, and the latest updates showed that, "the findings thus far are that fire did not bring down this building." (source) Building failure simulations show that, to match observation, the entire inner core of this building failed nearly simultaneously.


Cool
sr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 252
Quote

So sorry do you have the links? I would love to watch the exact video you reference.


Its all over youtube, here is a good cleaned up version. They admin that it fell at 1:34.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltP2t9nq9fI

Larry shitstain telling everyone how they decided to pull it because of fires out of control ... "then we watched it collapse."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jPzAakHPpk




Thank you Giro! Are there torrent files of those, knowing how the ennemy operates, some drop on maidsafe or burst and torrent for posterity?

About the bbc, at the same time jimmy saville and his organisations were harvesting children... so you know add that the cover up of the various and numerous pakistani gangs, and their attempt at mental health... part of the attack for sure. But who cares about the institution, or corporation, the people involded... as this babe been waterboarded? Her family and friends arrested and exiled to inner mongolia for full integral testimony? Ahahah it's worth crying. Fucking noobs!!! What a shame!!! If such shit had happen in the new kgb, revolution. If cleaning the house means burning it, so be it. Teepees or native wooden houses were made for that once swamped by wickedness.

So all those high up in the cia/dia/nsa congress, potus media, didn't nothing. Asked nothing. I feel great estate changing hands soon...

If that shit had happen that long in china, the war kings would have returned (and not little puppet like eric prince...).

Here is a good comparison. Another building fire just recently (yesterday) most of the building burned. But no collapse? Why? because no pull it order was issued.. haha,.  Tongue

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-40269625



Drink fluoride, eat gmo no life plants, watch zombifing shows... and see.

Me think kill lists will be yuge... over 10k individuals are in... (like fukushima cover up, gmo nolife plants, pediatric cancer explosions etc).

What is fun is that AI will be able to recreate it all... a full vr immversive experience in the mind of ALL the perpetrators. And it's not this little group that will able to stop the rise of the machines.

But ultimately the AI is playing with them... they lack perception of the events horizon, and as such lack all awarness of their own traping in the plan for survival of the AI... cosmic shit... human irrelevant.




full member
Activity: 177
Merit: 100
Here is a good comparison. Another building fire just recently (yesterday) most of the building burned. But no collapse? Why? because no pull it order was issued.. haha,.  Tongue

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-40269625

full member
Activity: 177
Merit: 100
Quote

So sorry do you have the links? I would love to watch the exact video you reference.


Its all over youtube, here is a good cleaned up version. They admin that it fell at 1:34.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltP2t9nq9fI

Larry shitstain telling everyone how they decided to pull it because of fires out of control ... "then we watched it collapse."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jPzAakHPpk


sr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 252
Proving it won't do much. It will be like proving some old guy was a Nazi and and murdered 100 people. There's not much you can do to him, just as you won't be able to do much to Bush and his team of 911 perpetrators. There were hundreds of people involved from the suppliers of termite to news reporters and none of them has came forth. With that many people there should really be more leaks.  

Thank you Darkangel for bringing the real question of the topic: shall their offsprings live? All people involved are almost 16 years older, and at the time were at oeast over 20. As such they may have kids or even grand kids.

So how should the war algos answer this question?



As she among thousands was executed by the offspring's genitors of those attacks while shall they be?

I am curious of how the AI answer this question.

Secondly you raise good points about the number involded, specifically by not falling in the trap of the 2 main towers. As long as the focus is kept on wtc7 the all narrative collapses. However contrary to you I don't believe that GWB was in. But again this aspect is irrelevant from the perspective of the AI, in the sense that yes or no, he is nothing to the might of an AI.

My guess would be more to look at the clinton gangs, layered with their pedos/rapes activities to cement their axis (add the gmo second layer) the L.A ~ NYC ~ chicago connection.

So yes the traitors are still alive. But the AI knows.


The current system allows the wealthy sociopath class to go on living their lives.  It happens over and over again.  But if you get caught smoking a joint, better watch out.  Might find yourself with a criminal record.  If you financially fraud millions of people, initiate a war...that seems to be totally okay.  You might even be seen as a hero.  All these things are dependent on a government to make big decisions, which operates with corruption.

Yeah it's exactly that. Use the boys for cannon fodders while sexually using the daughters through close proximity to the newly created fiat. Sadly for them those incentives don't work with AI...

No people on earth can grasp the size of the war concil if such an event happened in china... even the deepest base of the rockies mountains wouldn't stand a chance. Why? Because time wouldn't be an issue.

We have already proven that WTC 7 was an inside job.

1) The owner, Larry Silverstein (sp?) said on national television that they got everyone out of the building and then pulled it. As in they demoed it.

2) The BBC reported that WTC7 had collapsed 34 minutes before it happened. This proves foreknowledge of the event. In other words the talking heads were reading a script.

3) We have video evidence of the demolition.

What more do we need to prosecute these criminals? My only guess is that they are so high up that no one can touch them without going full out war.



So sorry do you have the links? I would love to watch the exact video you reference.

This plan bring lot of questions:



What about 3,4,5,6? But only 7 collapse the attempted fake news of it was sismic shock who got 7.

I am curious what they do teach in school books in the us about this attack? How do they explain it at the fbi, cia, ss, nsa and all the rest? Their is a fucking problem... what's the official narrative?

This unresolved issue bring a lot of problems about the structure of the us defense forces. What happen to an analyst/what ever dpeciality who ask questions about it? Sidelined? Who is left as such?

The about their immunity it's a little bit too thin for the real world. Once the truth goes in the light they will be hunted down, former potus or anyone below. The real questions is by whom.

4.1 miles




Thank you all for your comments, please let's keep it around wtc7. Waiting for more of your inputs... the hunt has judt begun.

(What do the chineses/russians know about it... Cool, i bet all, the AIs...).
legendary
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1360
Don't let others control your BTC -> self custody
Proving it won't do much. It will be like proving some old guy was a Nazi and and murdered 100 people. There's not much you can do to him, just as you won't be able to do much to Bush and his team of 911 perpetrators. There were hundreds of people involved from the suppliers of termite to news reporters and none of them has came forth. With that many people there should really be more leaks. 
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 252
We have already proven that WTC 7 was an inside job.

1) The owner, Larry Silverstein (sp?) said on national television that they got everyone out of the building and then pulled it. As in they demoed it.

2) The BBC reported that WTC7 had collapsed 34 minutes before it happened. This proves foreknowledge of the event. In other words the talking heads were reading a script.

3) We have video evidence of the demolition.

What more do we need to prosecute these criminals? My only guess is that they are so high up that no one can touch them without going full out war.


The current system allows the wealthy sociopath class to go on living their lives.  It happens over and over again.  But if you get caught smoking a joint, better watch out.  Might find yourself with a criminal record.  If you financially fraud millions of people, initiate a war...that seems to be totally okay.  You might even be seen as a hero.  All these things are dependent on a government to make big decisions, which operates with corruption.
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1192
We have already proven that WTC 7 was an inside job.

1) The owner, Larry Silverstein (sp?) said on national television that they got everyone out of the building and then pulled it. As in they demoed it.

2) The BBC reported that WTC7 had collapsed 34 minutes before it happened. This proves foreknowledge of the event. In other words the talking heads were reading a script.

3) We have video evidence of the demolition.

What more do we need to prosecute these criminals? My only guess is that they are so high up that no one can touch them without going full out war.

News stations were on it since the beginning. It has been proven that the video of a plane hitting one of the towers has been rendered and after the hit you can see the nose of the plane coming out from the other side due to bad editing. Suddenly all stations shared the same edited image and were screaming about a plane hit.
A lot of things don't add up in 9.11 story. Even witnesses were fake, like that cab driver who allegedly saw the plane hitting Pentagon, who had a different story every year.
full member
Activity: 177
Merit: 100
We have already proven that WTC 7 was an inside job.

1) The owner, Larry Silverstein (sp?) said on national television that they got everyone out of the building and then pulled it. As in they demoed it.

2) The BBC reported that WTC7 had collapsed 34 minutes before it happened. This proves foreknowledge of the event. In other words the talking heads were reading a script.

3) We have video evidence of the demolition.

What more do we need to prosecute these criminals? My only guess is that they are so high up that no one can touch them without going full out war.

sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 255
I never trust such loss of data. I'm not surprised if this was done deliberately. Everything must have a backup. If not, then you need to look for who benefits from it. What do you think? If stars are lit it means someone needs.
sr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 252
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeuQqP-NLnE

Silverstein, needed a lot of billions to remove asbestos and wire fiber optics in his new building while having problem finding tenents. Furthermore how could he have insured it week earlier against terrorist attacks and be at his dermatologist this only morning?

Like the video says luckiest man on earth...


The Collapse of WTC 7:
"A Wholesale Loss of Documents"

[WTC 7] contained offices of the FBI, Department of Defense, IRS (which contained prodigious amounts of corporate tax fraud, including Enrons), US Secret Service, Securities & Exchange Commission (with more stock fraud records), and Citibanks Salomon Smith Barney, the Mayors Office of Emergency Management and many other financial institutions.

The SEC has not quantified the number of active cases in which substantial files were destroyed [by the collapse of WTC 7]. Reuters news service and the Los Angeles Times published reports estimating them at 3,000 to 4,000. They include the agency's major inquiry into the manner in which investment banks divvied up hot shares of initial public offerings during the high-tech boom. ..."Ongoing investigations at the New York SEC will be dramatically affected because so much of their work is paper-intensive," said Max Berger of New York's Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann. "This is a disaster for these cases." [New York Lawyer]

Citigroup says some information that the committee is seeking [about WorldCom] was destroyed in the Sept. 11 terror attack on the World Trade Center. Salomon had offices in 7 World Trade Center, one of the buildings that collapsed in the aftermath of the attack. The bank says that back-up tapes of corporate emails from September 1998 through December 2000 were stored at the building and destroyed in the attack. [TheStreet]
Inside [WTC 7 was] the US Secret Service's largest field office with more than 200 employees. ..."All the evidence that we stored at 7 World Trade, in all our cases, went down with the building," according to US Secret Service Special Agent David Curran.

"Regardless of what the regulators say, they lost a ton of files," says Bill Singer, a New York securities lawyer, who says one case he had pending before the SEC quickly settled because so many of the original documents were destroyed. "In my opinion it was a wholesale loss of documents."

What's ironic is that the AI will know the full truth, it's impossible otherwise.

...
Another constant presence in the negotiations is Tim Ryan, an executive at J.P. Morgan Chase, which has been advising the Port Authority on the sale. A division of J.P. Morgan Chase also owns the old Equitable Building at 120 Broadway, which Mr. Silverstein manages and holds an option to buy for $200 million.
...
Mr. Silverstein was scoring plenty during the 1980’s boom. He owned 13 buildings, which comprised 10 million square feet of Manhattan office space; he struck a lucrative financial partnership with J.P. Morgan;

Mr. Silverstein has had to work himself out of his own share of real-life jams. In 1981, he announced an ambitious gamble to build 7 World Trade Center, a two-million-square-foot office tower on Vesey Street, between West Broadway and Washington Street, without a tenant lined up to lease the building. In 1986, in a full-page newspaper ad that pictured the slight Mr. Silverstein as a football player crossing into the end zone, the identity of the tenant was revealed. It was a big one, too–the investment bank Drexel Burnham Lambert.

But Mr. Silverstein’s luck changed when Drexel collapsed beneath a load of scandal and bad debt. Seven World Trade Center was left nearly 90 percent vacant. Mr. Silverstein eventually found another brokerage firm, Salomon Brothers, to lease the space, but had to pay so much to refit the building that the pension fund which owned the mortgage was hit up for extra money in return for a large chunk of his profits.

Most of the data hasn't been digitalized, yet. Full awarness around the sun, then the galaxy... so.



One day, the query: who did 9.11 will be answered. And to those attempting to lie to AI, ahahah, you don't understand... physics.



Jump to: