I usually bet on a final out come and the odds are for example: 1.7 or 1.35 when i place a bet (these are american odds). I do not know about what these units are all about.
But I noticed that I placed a bet on a team that I think will not win now so I want to bet on the other team if they do manage to win but by 2 or more goals. So what i am saying is that I do not want to lose on both tickets.
This is the reason why I am wanting to place this second bet but to cover both outcomes.
-2.5 is what is offered on the other team but i do not think the winning team is powerful enough to win by more than 2 goals.
So this is not hedging your bets so to cover your own bets from losing on either of them?
Hedging needs better than -100(2.00) odds to cover.
1.7 or 1.35 are decimal odds.
+358, -158 format are moneyline.
Moneyline works on the basis of 100. A + is the amount you will receive if you bet 100 and win. +358 means if you bet 100, you will win 358.
A - is the amount you must bet to win 100. -158 means you must bet 158 to win 100.
The idea with hedging is to have better than 2.00 decimal odds on both outcomes so that if you bet $1 on both, you will still win.
There are different ways to approach this, prop betting, parlays, etc.
Alexa Grasso via KO/TKO (+360)
Felice Herrig via Submission (+925)
+360 means $100 bet will win $360.
+925 means $100 bet will win $925.
A person could bet $100 on both outcomes and their winnings would be greater than their losses.
Of course this doesn't cover other outcomes like a draw, or wins or losses by decision.
That's a drawback with hedging. It offers less coverage for greater risk.