Topic: how do you choose ICO ? (Read 254 times)
There are a number of aspects that need to be addressed before deciding to spend your own time on performing bounty tasks. In other words, the proposed project must go through your "face-control" to assess the financial attractiveness. In fact, you need to understand how much money you can ultimately be able to collect a particular project.
I believe that certain factors must be taken into account when choosing a project. First of all, it is the amount of money that is going to be collected and the idea of the project.
Being in the world of the crypto currencies and then looking for the right ICO project to invest your money is not an easy thing to do and that you must be very much careful while looking for any kind of the project as there are so many ICO projects which are reported as scam and that you need to be wise enough so that you may not fall victim of any such scam and that your money may not be lost. 
There are rules on which people are assessed ico?
But you can not be completely sure that this is exactly what happens. Team and road map, advisers, white paper, they are all good, there are prospects. But then they just pissed off all the people. From such it is impossible to insure. So, how to properly evaluate ico?
of the project because if there is no popularity then there are small chances that the project will be successful.
The safest way to invest in the ICO (after you doing research on the WP, Main idea, and team/company legitimate) is to wait until the sale reached at least soft cap phase. yes, you will become less profitable because you'll miss early-bird bonuses, but its safer that way.
I suggest you to never invest on the pre-sale phase except you 100% sure about the legitimacy of the ICO project.
I suggest you to never invest on the pre-sale phase except you 100% sure about the legitimacy of the ICO project.
ICO'S are becoming difficult nowadays to differciate genuine ones from fake ones. The system is becoming sophisticated. If you want to know genuine ICO'S, then put an eye on team, intended problems to solve, read and understand whitepaper very well, too much promises is always a roadmap to scam. Do as much review as possible. Because it is too painful to waste hard earned money on scam/irrelevant projects.
There are rules on which people are assessed ico?
But you can not be completely sure that this is exactly what happens. Team and road map, advisers, white paper, they are all good, there are prospects. But then they just pissed off all the people. From such it is impossible to insure. So, how to properly evaluate ico?
My own ICO selection is to analyze the number of tokens sold each round. These indicators will show whether the project has potential or not 
). Also, the team, advisors as well as plans and objectives of the ICO project in the future is also very important, need to analyze and study carefully before deciding to invest in the ICO project.
). Also, the team, advisors as well as plans and objectives of the ICO project in the future is also very important, need to analyze and study carefully before deciding to invest in the ICO project.
I love projects that will have huge momentum and big audience along with use case in the future which will affect price of the tokens.
Offcourse i also check for the team and mvp product which is also of great importance .
Offcourse i also check for the team and mvp product which is also of great importance .
There are rules on which people are assessed ico?
But you can not be completely sure that this is exactly what happens. Team and road map, advisers, white paper, they are all good, there are prospects. But then they just pissed off all the people. From such it is impossible to insure. So, how to properly evaluate ico?
we must be sure of the team of a project with all the considerations, if you are always hesitant to see a team that you do not know then you will never succeed, and the proof has been a lot of successful bounty with underrated teams, who knows before trying.
I don't choose ICOs at all, I simply wait for the currency to be listed on an exchange and buy it cheaper than the ICO price, because almost always the price will drop.
Whitepaper, roadmap and checking for any signs it's a fake. You often find the scam ones won't bother with videos where there's people presenting, after all who wants their face to be visible if their planning on scamming people out of potentially their life savings.
the way I choose an ICO project is to review some aspects such as: Whitepaper, Roadmap, Token Structure, Team & Advisor, partner, and also the Rating of the project.
Quite simply my parameters are whether the project has a good future. That's the target of my review.
If the results of my review are good enough, then chances are I will participate in the ICO project.
Quite simply my parameters are whether the project has a good future. That's the target of my review.
If the results of my review are good enough, then chances are I will participate in the ICO project.
when I choose a project I look that would have been collected the maximum amount of money, I read the project itself, which team. what is the rank of the Manager.
I like the Ico's that will be handled by third parties, they audit the Ico and do the KYC/AML and they process the payments and send out the coins. This is more secure then participate directly with a project.
Most Ico's nowadays end up lower in price then the initial Ico price. I think the market is flooded with projects due to the quick and easy money there's made. I agree with the onter pointers mentioned in the thread
(and the ones you named yourself). Always do good research and look for projects with a real edge. Good luck
Most Ico's nowadays end up lower in price then the initial Ico price. I think the market is flooded with projects due to the quick and easy money there's made. I agree with the onter pointers mentioned in the thread
(and the ones you named yourself). Always do good research and look for projects with a real edge. Good luck
I choose ICO depending on the projects product if it will become usable among many if it is then next thing i do is to check the team involve on the project if they are trustworthy and real person who have different achievements in life. With thise factor i am certain that one ICO will become successful and i will surely invest on them.
I believe that certain factors must be taken into account when choosing a project. First of all, it is the amount of money that is going to be collected and the idea of the project.
There are rules on which people are assessed ico?
But you can not be completely sure that this is exactly what happens. Team and road map, advisers, white paper, they are all good, there are prospects. But then they just pissed off all the people. From such it is impossible to insure. So, how to properly evaluate ico?
Before choosing any ico you have to check the ico road map and team of ico project and idea about the ico further plans and there are more ico reviewing site is there you can do some research about ico project in that website.
there are some things to note if you want to invest in ico,
- Study the ICO’s whitepaper and evaluate the use cases: Before selecting an ICO to invest in, prospective investors should read the whitepaper and evaluate the projects’ feasibility and decide if the platform has present and future real-world use .
- Check the project’s MVP (minimum viable product)
- Study the company’s website and team: The website is a great place to ‘meet’ the team. Reading the bios of the core team can help an investor understand their value; the golden rule here is ‘A good team = good product’.
- Follow the team’s social media profiles: Typically, individuals passionate about a product or project will share their views on their own product, other projects and the industry.
- And Look Out for Project Announcements on Various Forums , ICO companies announce launches on alternate media channels, like cryptocurrency forums and Telegram, in addition to social media. There are several websites that list upcoming ICO’s and rate them.
- Study the ICO’s whitepaper and evaluate the use cases: Before selecting an ICO to invest in, prospective investors should read the whitepaper and evaluate the projects’ feasibility and decide if the platform has present and future real-world use .
- Check the project’s MVP (minimum viable product)
- Study the company’s website and team: The website is a great place to ‘meet’ the team. Reading the bios of the core team can help an investor understand their value; the golden rule here is ‘A good team = good product’.
- Follow the team’s social media profiles: Typically, individuals passionate about a product or project will share their views on their own product, other projects and the industry.
- And Look Out for Project Announcements on Various Forums , ICO companies announce launches on alternate media channels, like cryptocurrency forums and Telegram, in addition to social media. There are several websites that list upcoming ICO’s and rate them.
99% of all ICOs are money-losing businesses. The times are over when you could make easily money out of almost every ICO.
Just do some research and compare the buying price of recent ICOs with the current value and many have less than have the value.
Just do some research and compare the buying price of recent ICOs with the current value and many have less than have the value.
Number one I look is the campaign manager itself, since we have friends in here that make the list of good bounty manager then I compare them so sometimes you can across with a names in both post so I go with it since they also tell the style of the manager and its previous work, then I check the project white paper, its roadmap, token supply and distribution.
Easy way to choose good bounty is to check the top rating of ICO list in some sites like ICOdrops, ICObench, Coingecko etc. Otherwise you have to analyze the project, keep track on manager, follow social activities, check whitepaper etc.
Just take some advices from the experiences players . What are their views and go thourgh the ICO's whitepaper thoroughly so that you
will get good knowledge of that ICO and also take go through the team of that ICO as its whole market is dependent on that team.
will get good knowledge of that ICO and also take go through the team of that ICO as its whole market is dependent on that team.
There are rules on which people are assessed ico?
But you can not be completely sure that this is exactly what happens. Team and road map, advisers, white paper, they are all good, there are prospects. But then they just pissed off all the people. From such it is impossible to insure. So, how to properly evaluate ico?
I have a lot sources for ICO's and I choose based on reading the whitepaper, I do not have a lot of technical knowledge, but I try to understand the problem and solution the project is proffering. I check the team and reviews about the project by respected people in the industry.
It is researc, you need to scan the space for good projects, most people recently only go to ico-listing website and youtube videos which is good but looking at the way the space has changed, you need to get into project early, like private sale and presale
There are a lot of factors that go into researching a valuable ICO. IMO you should be looking at the goal that they are trying to accomplish, the problem they are trying to solve, the steps they are taking and willing to take to solve the given problem, what kind of funds they're trying to raise for their project.
Example...if a startup project is trying to raise 400 million, you have to ask yourself, why on earth do they need that much money?
Take a look at a couple of projects, I think you'll find them interesting. Fr8 Network and/or Muirfield IP.
Fr8 is trying to remove intermediaries from the supply chain process, bringing revenue back to distributors and carriers.
Muirfield IP is a private equity fund based on the blockchain.
Still, DYOR.
Example...if a startup project is trying to raise 400 million, you have to ask yourself, why on earth do they need that much money?
Take a look at a couple of projects, I think you'll find them interesting. Fr8 Network and/or Muirfield IP.
Fr8 is trying to remove intermediaries from the supply chain process, bringing revenue back to distributors and carriers.
Muirfield IP is a private equity fund based on the blockchain.
Still, DYOR.
Everyone should have their own strategy in this regard. I first of all read the white paper and look at the team. After that I draw conclusions, it is necessary to me further to understand the project or not
There are rules on which people are assessed ico?
But you can not be completely sure that this is exactly what happens. Team and road map, advisers, white paper, they are all good, there are prospects. But then they just pissed off all the people. From such it is impossible to insure. So, how to properly evaluate ico?
You can never 100% avoid risks in investing. Scammers have always been and will be especially in the ICOs, because at the moment there is no full-fledged regulatory legislation.
I suggest you to review ICO first. You can check ICO on reviewing site. On Icobench my first see is activity of ICO on Bitcointlk, social media, etc. Check telegram channel to. more member on telegram, is more chance success. Why activity is important ( in my opinion ), its because ICO is need investor to reach success for his project. So, more activity is more chance to get investor. Investing.com is good option to review ICO. On investing.com is not crypto only and have a big investing community . So, if ICO is listing on investing.com, i think that ICO have a chance to success.
Good Luck.
*Sorry my Bad English
Good Luck.
*Sorry my Bad English
first I see the rate iconya, whitepaper, website and also threadnya
and the most important thing is to know the team of the ico project
and the most important thing is to know the team of the ico project
I kind of go into IcoBench and check the hot ICOs then go on a deeper research about those. There's a lot to check but it's better if you make your own judgement based on the information you gathered so you can do better over time.
All that you listed is still what almost everybody posting here will tell you. Kind of you knew the answers already. Let me add, buying into ICO is like crossing the rail tracks with eyes closed. It is a very big risk. Even those with great team and white paper still end up fraudulent.
There are rules on which people are assessed ico?
But you can not be completely sure that this is exactly what happens. Team and road map, advisers, white paper, they are all good, there are prospects. But then they just pissed off all the people. From such it is impossible to insure. So, how to properly evaluate ico?
Jump to: