Topic: How long until we are all forced jabbed with the vax? (Read 274 times)

Aye. As irrelevant as your whole post. Lol.     

The word 'the' is irrelevant here. Please don't try to sidestep the request for evidence. You're claiming that 50% of US doctors are against the Covid vaccine. If you're not willing to supply evidence, then your argument is not based in fact, and is worthless, you may as well just state any unsubstantiated figure. For example: 99.73% of US doctors are in favour of the Covid vaccine.

Made up figures can't form the basis of a solid argument.

some kind of troll who is intentionally trying to mix things up

Really? Over 50% of doctors in the US don't believe in vaccination? Do you have the data source to hand? Please don't say it's the satan-soldiers hat guy reporting from his living room again.

look at how many honest doctors and medical people from around the world are fighting the idea of the vaccine use on themselves. It's over 50% in the USA.

Illuminati is real.

But USA never bought the vaccines from China because their states itself produced lot of vaccines and invented them as well so why would someone from the same nation should inject a slow poison as vaccine?

If I have to choose between the AstraZeneca vaccine and getting infected, I'd rather get infected.

I know of several cases of middle-aged people, without pathologies, who after taking this vaccine have been unable to get out of bed for several days. The normal thing in these young healthy people is that if they catch the virus, the symptoms are less than that.

The coronavirus problem could have been solved in a better way: imposing restrictions only on the elderly and people with pathologies, instead of paralyzing entire economies. The problem is that no politician would dare to do that because then in the next election, the majority of millions of retirees would have voted against them because they felt discriminated against.

Finally it's starting to make real sense. The vax jab has been designed as an experiment by China to use on the USA. How did they get it in? Through election fraud. They used massive election fraud o get rid of Trump... not that Trump would have been any better regarding lockdowns and masks. But Biden was the key to letting China in, a thing Trump wouldn't have done.

China pushed the vaccine in, so that Americans would become immobilized at best, and all die at worst. And if nothing else, China would see what happened to a nation when the whole thing was vaccinated with a programmed vaccine that would make them into super-spreaders, and destroy their ability to think, calculate, and reproduce in the long run.

Mike Lindell has the video of the election fraud that answers all the questions about the election fraud. And common sense and thinking shows that Gates, Fauci, the Chinese government, and many others, are working together to destroy America through the destruction of our election operations.


https://cdn.jigg.cloud/ScientificProofTVSpecial-03-31-21-FINALHQ/mp4/ScientificProofTVSpecial-03-31-21-FINALHQ.mp4?fbclid=IwAR2uu09ykp1vAktXpFNVhNe-2s2AK4Ej789IIximuP1yiROJN9YUIMDlE-M





Lindell TV is just starting. It will have a bunch more as they grow - https://lindelltv.com/.

Obviously this will vary country by country (and likely also within countries), with some stricter than others. But if the vaccine prevents transmission as well as infection, then it does make perfect sense to have restrictions for unvaccinated people, who could be carriers and be infecting others. Particularly if the people without the Covid pass are those who have actively refused the vaccine, and are disproportionately likely to not wear masks or conform to social distancing measures.

However, despite being a recognized form of gene therapy since its inception, vaccine makers are now frantically trying to deny that this mRNA technology is gene therapy. One reason for this, suggested by David Martin, Ph.D.,1 might be because as long as they're considered "vaccines," they will be shielded from liability.

Experimental gene therapies do not have financial liability shielding from the government, but pandemic vaccines do, even in the experimental stage, as long as the emergency use authorization is in effect. Another reason might be because they fear people won't line up for experimental gene therapy. It has a very different connotation in people's minds (as it should).

A third possibility is that they know full well that you cannot, ethically, mandate gene therapy in the way you can mandate vaccines. Mandatory public health measure directives are typically based on the idea that it's acceptable for some individuals to be harmed as long as the measure benefits the collective.

Well, the COVID-19 "vaccines" are only designed to lessen symptoms of COVID-19. They do not prevent infection or spread, and since the vaccinated individual is the only one receiving a potential benefit, "the greater good" argument falls apart.

Who knows, there may be other factors at play that we've not realized as of yet, but whatever the reason, they really do not want you to think of these injections as gene therapy. They want you to accept them as any other conventional vaccine.

The potential routes to immunity are a) get vaccinated, or b) contract the virus.

Obviously vaccination is not 100% effective, and will not safeguard against all future variants. But if virus mutation is sufficient to render current vaccines irrelevant, then the vaccines will be modified accordingly - modification being in general a simple, quick process, and not really comparable to the process of deriving a new vaccine from scratch. Take the annual updating of the flu vaccine as an example here.

Vaccination or infection are the routes to immunity. Take your pick as to which is preferable.

Even at the end of 2022 still we may lack enough vaccines to vaccinate people in the every corner of this world, but we are already free now, we don't have any lockdown inside the borders. Probably restrictions to travel abroad due to the third wave but people started to love along with the covid because starving is deadlier than covid.

There's already been discussions from some California schools that I've been reading about which essentially say that your child must be vaccinated in order for them to return to school -- remember, the Moderna/Pfizer vaccine has not gone through clinical trials for children, the median age was in the 50's for a participant of the clinical trial. And you can be fired from your job if you refuse to get the vaccine. So yes, we are down the road of forced vaccines.

Even at the end of 2022 still we may lack enough vaccines to vaccinate people in the every corner of this world, but we are already free now, we don't have any lockdown inside the borders. Probably restrictions to travel abroad due to the third wave but people started to love along with the covid because starving is deadlier than covid.

I give it by 2022.

You won`t be able to travel without your covid pass.
You won`t be able to shop without your covid pass.

The governments are planning on using their military's to dish out the vaccines.
Trump said it himself.

https://youtu.be/6ot2FFc_Qq4?t=54

There's already been discussions from some California schools that I've been reading about which essentially say that your child must be vaccinated in order for them to return to school -- remember, the Moderna/Pfizer vaccine has not gone through clinical trials for children, the median age was in the 50's for a participant of the clinical trial. And you can be fired from your job if you refuse to get the vaccine. So yes, we are down the road of forced vaccines.

In this interview, which was initially banned by YouTube before it was even published (but now reversed), Spiro is joined by Attorney Ana Garner of New Mexico. Garner represents her client Isaac Legaretta, an officer at the Doña Ana County Detention Center and a military veteran, who is suing the county over its new policy for first responders to receive the COVID-19 vaccinations or face termination.

Attorney Garner explains the significance of this case and what is at stake, as it is the first of its kind and may set a new standard for legal precedent regarding mandatory vaccination. Garner says she is prepared to take this case to the Supreme Court if necessary.

Spiro and Ana Garner also discuss another case of hers that is ongoing currently. A case that challenges not only the Governor of New Mexico, but the emergency itself.

Being vaccinated reduces natural immunity, and doesn't guarantee protection from the new variants. If we are to be given a virus passport, it should be based on a test for immunity, and not on the hope that an artificial virus infection will give immunity.

Obviously this will vary country by country (and likely also within countries), with some stricter than others. But if the vaccine prevents transmission as well as infection, then it does make perfect sense to have restrictions for unvaccinated people, who could be carriers and be infecting others. Particularly if the people without the Covid pass are those who have actively refused the vaccine, and are disproportionately likely to not wear masks or conform to social distancing measures.

You won`t be able to travel without your covid pass.
You won`t be able to shop without your covid pass.