Author

Topic: How much development does a million bucks buy you in an ICO? Answer inside (Read 1350 times)

hero member
Activity: 519
Merit: 500
So it seems as Blocknet was a 100% bullshit scam indeed. XC is also dead. Thank god I sold my XC and blocknet shares before too much harm was done.

Now there are only 2 anon coins left worth looking at, Monero and Darkcoin. The rest is 100% bullshit.

You forgot SuperCoin, dev finally released the code and it appears the multisig technology is legit and working. New dev will be taking over soon. Keep an eye on it
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
The Buck Stops Here.
Show proof to substantiate any of these "facts" and maybe, just maybe, I'll consider wasting my time refuting every single one.

Maybe you should focus your efforts on tracking down jasinlee  Grin

The title isn't misleading at all. There is no justification for the IPO when you look at the repository. There is 0 (zero) functioning code.

They raised a ton of money and have produced nothing. You've been scammed.
member
Activity: 164
Merit: 37
they did not get a million for their ico. Most was selfbuys.

I agree. I'm willing to bet Dan, Prom, and others in their group "bought" a big portion of the ICO.  And those BTC's just goes right back to them and now they are probably slowly selling their "bought" tokens to people who are silly enough to buy them.

You mean they had a big fraction of a million before the IPO? Where would they have got it from, other IPOs?
sr. member
Activity: 391
Merit: 250
they did not get a million for their ico. Most was selfbuys.

I agree. I'm willing to bet Dan, Prom, and others in their group "bought" a big portion of the ICO.  And those BTC's just goes right back to them and now they are probably slowly selling their "bought" tokens to people who are silly enough to buy them.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
they did not get a million for their ico. Most was selfbuys.
legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
So it seems as Blocknet was a 100% bullshit scam indeed. XC is also dead. Thank god I sold my XC and blocknet shares before too much harm was done.

Now there are only 2 anon coins left worth looking at, Monero and Darkcoin. The rest is 100% bullshit.

Spot on - cant believe how many scams came out copying Dark/Monero and XC was one of them. Copying almost everything from Dark, SuperNet and now BitSwift lol

Feel sorry as there are alot of losers in both XC and Block never to see their investments again.

Alot of people were screaming during the ICO saying it was a scam, they didnt even have anything tangible to show except for a few pretty graphics.


In future I think ICO's can only succeed if they have a prototype or workable demo they can release to the public.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
So it seems as Blocknet was a 100% bullshit scam indeed. XC is also dead. Thank god I sold my XC and blocknet shares before too much harm was done.

Now there are only 2 anon coins left worth looking at, Monero and Darkcoin. The rest is 100% bullshit.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
Firstly, the ICO raised 950 BTC which is about $350,000

Only ? oh... well 350000$ you can't do anything at all... just take a few vacation at most and not too far from home...  
most likely rent a tent to put in the garden...  Roll Eyes
(basically, teenage dev run away with the btc and hide in a tent in his parents garden...)
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Show proof to substantiate any of these "facts" and maybe, just maybe, I'll consider wasting my time refuting every single one.

Maybe you should focus your efforts on tracking down jasinlee  Grin
full member
Activity: 245
Merit: 124
Satoshi wrote the original bitcoin client for free and published the source code for free.

Open source innovation doesn't need money... If this coin was a good idea, someone would have made it for free and then mined because the value of being an early adopter itself would be the reward.

If someone asks for money to develop an altcoin they at best have no faith in their idea and at worst are a scam artist.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Lol!  There's nothing "subtle" needed.  I'm a pretty straight shooter unlike most around here

Fact.  Dan said others would be working on blocknet.  There is no one.

Fact.  Xc said it would specifically communicate how premise funds were distributed and they never did.  Asking gets you booted.

Fact.  Any verifiable proof that blocknet is being actively worked on doesn't exist ... except from a team who can't get their act together and release financials a month after promised.


Maybe you guys should hire me.  I might not delete your ideas of trolls , but I could sure as hell do a spreadsheet on who got paid what and rebrand your wallet.

Maybe you'd find this interesting.  If nobody buys the FUD from me etc etc check this poll out.  The forums best known fudder has more cred than your developer LOL!

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9616690
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Firstly, the ICO raised 950 BTC which is about $350,000

Secondly:
Hello all,

just wanted to provide an update, due to the amount of noise from the trolls creating FUD to lower the market price, its hard to communicate directly with real blocknet enthusiasts.

As I stated, we will have a test/prototype p2p daemon by the end of the month, if not sooner and with that a clear roadmap and other details regarding this project.

While things may seem to be in a lull currently, it is just part of the process of putting everything in order

I'm available via PM for any questions as its hard to keep up w/ all the noise from trolls.


Dan


Unicornfarts/rdnkjdi if you're gonna dedicate your life to fudding XC and blocknet at least be subtle if you want people to fall for it. Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
did you expect developement on that one? hahahaha
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Pay 2 Million more and they might even change Bitswift in the README to Blocknet.

https://github.com/atcsecure/blocknet/tree/master/doc

"bitswift v1.0.0.0
Distributed under the MIT/X11 software license, see the accompanying
file license.txt or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php."

Lol ud think they would try harder.  As much time as they spend censoring
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 1001
This looks to me as if they haven't done anything at all on the code for 19 days....or if they have done anything, then they are keeping their new code very well hidden somewhere else (in keeping with XC/BlockNets ethos of honesty and transparency  Grin )



 
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
Pay 2 Million more and they might even change Bitswift in the README to Blocknet.

https://github.com/atcsecure/blocknet/tree/master/doc

"bitswift v1.0.0.0
Distributed under the MIT/X11 software license, see the accompanying
file license.txt or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php."
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
none, I don't think any ICO which has been able to rise that much ended up with anything except filling the pocket of dev.
(now just look at the standard annual  salary of a programmer divide 1M by that... that gives you an idea of what can be done...)
Jump to: