Topic: How much investment is ACTUALLY represented by the bitcoin "market cap"? (Read 1888 times)

It sounds like he wants:

Total cost of coins purchased less total proceeds from coins sold
+total electric bill from miners
+the depreciated cost of mining equipment & rents, leases etc...

Back to market cap:
If you invest $1000 in bitcoin when it was $100, and the price goes to $600, your 1000 investment grows to 6000.
So today, you have $6,000 invested.
You could have sold it for $6,000 at which point you would have zero invested, but you didn't. So the investment remains $6000 

Market Cap is a good measure of something different from what the OP wants.  I'm not sure why it's an issue.  Market cap is the current market valuation, OP wants to know the total amount invested.  The two aren't particularly related, at any time the market cap may be considerably more than that invested, and over time the total invested could be considerably more than the market cap.  History is littered with companies that had millions or billions invested but are worth zilch today; likewise many young companies have astronomical valuations with only a fraction of that invested.

That is because market cap is the closest and most meaningful value available. The value is not what people have paid or would receive. You are looking for a single aggregate value that represents all the valuations of every person that holds or is aware of Bitcoin. Even though it is not perfect, the market cap is the best measure because the price mechanism gives an actual value instead of a theoretical value.

This is going round in circles, and I only have so many palms to face with.
I think the question has been answered to my satisfaction, in two different ways. One was aminorex's formula (thank you) and one was the manual approximation of that from exchange closing price/volumes. We're not talking fundamentals, here, which are totally divorced from the price of buying/running a mining rig.
The whole point was to figure out the relationship between investment and price. Market cap is a meaningless measure of bitcoin's value as far as I'm concerned, because the market cap is not what people have paid, or would receive, for their coins. But it's still the metric quoted everywhere...

If you could buy all bitcoins at the current market price, the price would be the current market cap

The current market cap is the total amount of money that has been "made" in bitcoin.
If the market cap increases, regardless of why, the total amount of money made increases.
If you buy and the price goes down, the amount of money made decreases.

Minded coins add to the market cap. Bought coins do not add to the market cap, unless the buy results in a higher price.

How much money was required to get it the current price? This has been determined by the laws of supply and demand.
If someone Wanted to buy a Billion Dollars worth of Bitcoin NOW, as in TODAY, meaning in the next hour, Well, that much is not offered at the current prices. So the price would, and as the price rises the market cap increases, and more people will be willing to sell at the higher prices.
How high would a billion dollar buy drive the price? That depends entirely on how long it took holders of bitcoin to offer up a billion dollars worth in total for sale.

Once can make valuation arguments for the current price. A 1T miner costs xxx and will have to run for DD days and consume WW watts costing $$ so 1 bitcoin today should be worth .... whatever that adds up to. But that and a dime still won't buy a cup of coffee.

For bitcoin to really succeed, the bitcoin community desperately needs an easy to understand demand driver for the non-technical market.
& Speculation, which initially good early on, is unlikely to provide long-term sustainability.



Hope that helps

Then it would be infinite. If everyone that wanted them was willing to buy them at any price then they would have to give everything they own for them.

I should say-if all bitcoins for sale were bought up.

That would be zero, of course. If everyone that had them was willing to sell them at any price, then they would have to give them all away.

A true representation-I believe-would be if all bitcoins on earth were dumped, what price would they go for total.

No - this is exactly my point. The idea of market cap is quite misleading in this sense but it's often quoted as a metric for a company's value (or here, bitcoin).
Ultimately it doesn't matter, since what I'm interested in finding out is what would happen to the price of bitcoin if, for example:
a) a big investor dropped in $1 million
b) 1,000,000 people decided it would be good to keep $10 in bitcoins to buy things with

The simplest and most tedious way of approximating that I guess would be to multiply the closing price by the volume for each day of trading (ignoring the earliest days) and using that to project future values based on additional investment.

I think this would be a useful thing to do because most people's idea of what might happen to the value of their bitcoin investment is based on wishful thinking or extremely shaky reasoning.

 The market cap is hard to associate with the combined value of all coins. Hardly the same factors.

Interest value is not easy to determine. It usually depends on various issues related rather high fluctuation of supply and demend on different moments of times. It is easy visible especially when we look on recent weeks.

...and it will not take too much for a huge move in either direction.

I doubt it's anything like that much.

Is the net total amount invested even 1 Billion?
Probably not even close.

$8 billion is not the total paid for every bitcoin in existence. Ask the people who bought at $1. This is what I'm interested in.

I don't think you understand what market cap is

It is aggregate value to aggregate investment

Good answer, this is what I was looking for. Thank you.

Empirically the price regresses to n^2.26+k where n is the number of active addresses.  n^2 would be adequately explained by Metcalfe's Law.  Explain the sqrt(sqrt(n)) factor and you may win a Rijksbank prize in honor of Alfred Nobel.

Price tends to fundamental value over time because otherwise you can arbitrage.

If ten times as many people adopt bitcoin, the price, to a first order approximation, increases by a factor of 180, ceteris paribus.

Market cap is a valuation, it doesn't count what has been invested.  Example, company X has 1m shares in issue and sells 100k shares for £10m.  The investment in company is £10m, the market cap is now £100m, because it is assumed the market would pay the same for the other 900k shares.  Now, if someone had previously brought 100k shares for £5million then the investment in the company is £15m, but the current market cap is still £100m.

To find out the total invested, as you'd have to track all the prices and volumes sold at each point in bitcoin's history. 

Yes, particularly vector calculus and graph theory. You can figure it out 

The amount that was paid for all the bitcoins in existence is found by determining what was exchanged for every unused output in the blockchain, somehow accounting for off-chain transactions.


Edit: Now that I think about it, even that doesn't work because simply moving money around gives false information.

But what price did you buy it at? Am I paying more than that? If so, money goes into the system.

Imagine the volume is zero, nobody wants to buy and sell at the same given price. So I sell you one bitcoin for 10 000$. How high would the market cap be? Think of the 4000 new coins everyday. So the market cap grows by 2.4mio. So if no miner sells, no money is needed to raise the market cap.

-> The market cap has absolutely nothing to do with the total dollars for which people bought bitcoins. And anyway, when I buy a bitcoin from you fpr 620$, how much dollars are flowing into bitcoin? None! We just make a trade...

Thanks, that's a useful starting point. We're looking at an orders-of-magnitude difference, then. Rather than the train passenger theory of "if ten times as many people adopt bitcoins the price will go up ten times."

This isn't exactly what you're after (apart from anything else it includes the alt coins) but might be useful? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/total-money-invested-in-cryptocoins-504367

I disagree. Someone buys and the price rises. Sell and it drops. Buy and sell and it stays the same. Marlet cap of $8 bn does not mean $8 bn investment.
I bet it has something to do with calculus.

People cash in and cash out all the time, there is no way of determining it and I do not think it is relevant. As long as you get someone pay $1500 for BitCoin, it is worth $1500

Simple question, possibly a complicated answer. One for the economists?
Bitcoin's "market cap" is currently around $8 billion = $640/btc x 12.5 million btc in existence.
However, this does NOT mean that $8 billion has been poured into bitcoin. Almost all were purchased at lower prices (or mined). Many coins were bought at a very low price. As more were bought, the price rose, to where it is now. Basic supply and demand.
My question is: roughly what is the total amount of money that was spent in pushing the price up to where it is now? I imagine there's some sort of exponential graph or a standard model that illustrates this, but I've no idea what it would be.
I think this is relevant because it gives an indication of how much the price would rise given further investment, or how much it would fall when people sold.
That would give a much better metric of long-term prospects than I've seen just about anywhere else. It might allow us to say, If xx corporate investor came on board with $yy million, where would the price go?
Or we could just keep talking about the magic train that's going to take us to the moon...