<…>
32 days after my first post I was personally meritless, although since I boarded the boat just before the Merit System was introduced, 31 days effectively under the Merit System I received my first Merit.
It wasn’t for a long topic on something I’d looked-up on the internet, not a ground-breaking idea, nor for helping anyone out, nor anything technical, but rather for an exaggerated exemplification of the potential effects of volatility on bitcoin prices at a retail store. Simple debate and opinion (with a spice of wit and humour).
Quality is completely subjective and relative, both to the reader and the moment in time one reads it, alongside many other factors such as the degree of freshness (as opposed to reiteration), and the interest that it arouses to the reader.
If fact, rather than "
quality", I’m more aligned with the idea that what is merited, in general terms, is "
interest". Quality seems like a rather demanding term. One can create a, let’s say, quality topic on something for the nth time, but it may lack interest to the reader (or the reader who has been around long enough) due to the topic having been dealt with multiple times.
A question, an opinion, a witty comment, a versed position, some aid pointers, etc. All these may be of some interest to the reader, and that is what is being sought. If it is well expressed, in a comprehensible grammar, all the more it will have in favour. It does not require the "quality" label, but rather more the "interest" label. Out of those, as a side-effect, some will get merited, but others will not. It is not the objective to merit every single interesting post, but a fair share. That, in the long run, providing one makes a habit of making interesting posts, should result (again, as a side-effect) on the account ranking-up.