Topic: How should Binance's delisting of BSV be interpreted or read? (Read 189 times)

If I remember it correctly BSV was quite popular that day when CZ delisted it. There was a lot of rumours and fake news created by Faketoshi that were pushing price up and down and volatility very often comes with volume.

CZ about Faketoshi before delisting
"The real Satoshi can digitally sign any message to prove it. This is as simple as breathing for him/her. And we have the pub key.

Until then, everyone is Satoshi, except Craig Wright!

Lastly, anyone who supports BSV from a tech perspective should be attacking the fraudulent Craig Wright, who is poisoning YOUR community, and not attack the rest of the world.

Anyone thinking CW is Satoshi should read about how a private key works, ie, learn about crypto."
https://twitter.com/cz_binance/status/1117606853121175552

And finally:

"Craig Wright is not Satoshi.

Anymore of this sh!t, we delist!"
https://twitter.com/cz_binance/status/1116563034476957699

At first an airdrop with such hype? I dont think bsv will still be around when Cz realizes that there is really none use to this btc fork. Many have gaine profits with this project and probably gone now and those who still holds are probably those trading it and thats the reason still why it is yet to be delisted since it got some volume. Cz only cares to project with such volume on trading and when its gone they could probably announced its being delisted.

to be honest i dont really know about what the real purpose of Bitcoin Satoshi vision its pretty much same with the original bitcoin just other hardfork to bitcoin holder it one of the reason why so much Centralized Exchange listing it at the first place because it give benefit to bitcoin holder at that time. and the reason of delisting maybe because Exchange sees no future in it so they delisiting it

https://coingeek.com/bsv-investors-file-9-9-billion-class-action-lawsuit-against-binance-bittylicious-kraken-and-shapeshift/

When Block-Chain technology first emerged, we imagined a system that was decentralized, much more free, where community decisions were not governed by a superior authority, just as the same state did. For years, this thought had been driven by the sufferings and feelings of being exploited by the state and capitalist corporations. In our lives, we've been enslaved so that someone's son can get in the most luxurious car. And we got used to it, we got it.


However, block-chain technology had come up with the dream of establishing a much more fair, secure equal system that would prevent monopolization of money supply. Personally, I'm still living this dream inside me. I never wanted to accept the management of block-chain technology by a certain authority, and I don't want it. Who really thinks some people have to respect their decisions because they have more cryptocurrency?


That's why I want to talk about the process that started with Binance's crazy BSV. I don't care if Bitcoin Cash is shitcoin or anything. In the community, I think everyone should equally express their opinion.

But how should it really be read that Binance is drilling BSV just because the CEO wanted it? On this basis, many exchanges have accepted Binancane's monopoly and continue to follow its path. But now we are talking about the dominance of a powerful exchange instead of the consensus. Some conflicts of interest give us the impression that what we dream of is actually coinciding.

What I have written so far may be a critical approach to the insane handling of BSV. Well, let's ask the bidet.:


Many security measures have been developed to prevent scam ICO projects from entering the market and to keep them out of the system. 2 years ago, this issue drew a serious reaction. But now that we look at it, we see how accurate this decision is.


So what exactly should we think about BSV being nuts? Please share your ideas and discuss them.