Hello condoras,
Thanks for the reply. To address your questions:
Even independent funds/companies have an office with at least one chair to do their trades/ job. Basicaly you gave a ridiculous excuse.
Our system is automated. If you were to audit our trade records, you'll see that our trades are placed 24/7 every day of the year. There is no 'chair' from which someone is trading around the clock. Instead, our team is located in various locations, each with a certain function: development, supervision, research, accounting, etc. To be in the same office would be to risk jeopardizing our clients' privacy, which is the antithesis to our vision and purpose. Much like Bitcoin, we are decentralized and distributed around the world--which is the
only way to function to preserve client anonymity. Look at what has happened to Chinese exchange offices recently. We would never expose our clients to the risk of having a public office that can be raided.
"Accredited investors" by who? How can you possibly accredit anyone when you don't even have an office?!
Keep in mind we were speaking about accredited investors in the past. We did have an office based in the USA, but have since changed course to the approach listed above, as we no longer operate in a space that requires accredited investors.
As for your "Marketing firm" with the name "The Global Wealth Fund AG", which you as a "Templar Fund" are under it (!) ,is based specifically at 32 London Bridge street, which is a well known place called "The Shard". I can say without a dought that this brand name of yours are not in "The Shard" list of offices. In simple words, you are lying.
Or perhaps it is possible you don't have access to every entity registered in the building. Keep in mind there are literally hundreds of 'brands' in that office without a public listing or building signage. To jump to the conclusion that we are lying is simply irrational when the possibility exists that there are unlisted entities using the property for legal purposes.
If though you want to tell the truth at some point (I hardly dought that you will), reply here.
This thread you've created is an ugly one. Similar to your mistake with the London address (savvy readers here will know the difference between a public entity and a private registered entity), you've accused us of very ugly things as a result of your incomplete understanding. Here's our challenge to you: find any evidence that we have scammed a single client. Or find any evidence that the products and services offered by our parent fund do not function or are not real. All you've posted is conjecture and opinion. Post a single fact or piece of evidence, and your post will be credible.
Furthermore, to keep this thread properly focused on the Templar Fund, we welcome you to fully audit our trade records. Every single trade we've ever made is published publicly on our website. You can reconcile each trade with BitMEX price records and exported order book (which can be certified by BitMEX). If you do this, you will find that our trades were 100% executed as advertised, and yes, we have earned more than 50% ROE this year. How on earth could you possibly accuse us of being a scam or out to maliciously hurt clients when the proof of our work is right there for anyone not lazy enough to ignore it? You seem to consider yourself to be an online investigator, yet all you've done so far is to check basic records (alexa, etc) and to weave a narrative built on some type of corruption. This conclusion would be supported by facts and evidence of deceit or scam, but we are fully confident that you find no such thing, as our actual clients are satisfied with our services. Facts and evidence: the Templar Fund is built upon these two things. There is nothing for us to hide. The entirety of our trade records are available online. Try to find that level of transparency from any traditional hedge fund. You will find that it, too, cannot be done.
Thanks for giving us the chance to address a common issue encountered among the present crypto-community: skepticism that runs so deep, it obscures reality and prevents people from understanding, appreciating and welcoming anything new.