i have a solid group of about 5 people, but i'd like to get it to about a dozen.
A proof-of-humanity blockchain would function as an identity network for decentralized elections and governments. Rather than relying on a one-cpu-one-vote protocol, the protocol would be one-human-one-vote. Digitally signed blocks can limit hashing power and prohibit artificial intelligence from overtaking the network. While POW relies on a computationally impossible series of mathematical problems, POH relies on computationally impossible biology.
This is not a currency system; this is not a replacement for bitcoin. Bitcoin is utilized in a POH to prevent spam in brain-to-service connections (though other types of transactions would be feeless, due to their unconscious/involuntary initiation). Thus, the two protocols are complementary. In a couple decades, this network could truly be bitcoin's 'killer app'.
Please e-mail
[email protected] if you're interested in reviewing the paper. Optionally, please describe your involvement in bitcoin (only relevant if I get more than 10 people interested).