Topic: How To Build A Portfolio That Moons (Whale Newsletter) (Read 71 times)
The only one that's going to benefit from all this is probably the whales that have written this portfolio format. Also, I am sure that not everyone could afford to copy this portfolio because the money involved is just exorbitant. To me, you're better off waiting for bitcoin to go down much lower and buy a lot of it when the prices are much more affordable and hodl until a new ATH happens.
Do you really believe that the so-called "whales" would share their investment thesis with ordinary people. There is no thesis to this. Those who were early and held onto hundreds of BTC by choice or sheer chance, were in the right position to be an "insider" to a lot of the investments that followed. Its basically a big boys' club where if you know, you know.
They spend time shilling each other and buying up stuff because they can afford to. A lot of the newcomers who get drawn in are the ones doing the major chunk of work. The "whales" don't need to do anything except have enough to move markets on projects and have pseudonymous twitter accounts to give subtle hints on projects and benefit from them.
The situation isn't as bad now because there has been a lot of fragmentation and competition. This is why there is always a chance to make bank in crypto if you have the time and can put the effort to know and use projects. I don't agree that there are straight-forward, low effort ways like buying up top coins.
They spend time shilling each other and buying up stuff because they can afford to. A lot of the newcomers who get drawn in are the ones doing the major chunk of work. The "whales" don't need to do anything except have enough to move markets on projects and have pseudonymous twitter accounts to give subtle hints on projects and benefit from them.
The situation isn't as bad now because there has been a lot of fragmentation and competition. This is why there is always a chance to make bank in crypto if you have the time and can put the effort to know and use projects. I don't agree that there are straight-forward, low effort ways like buying up top coins.
Don't rely on temporary ranks on coinmarketcap for your investment decisions. If you base on this and pick a coin which has x200 growth like $Solana, do you think it is a good decision?
Spend a few minutes to check snapshots of top coins on coinmarketcap. I hope after checking, you will realize that many top coins in the past few years disappeared now and many of us even don't know they are used to be top coins.
Spend a few minutes to check snapshots of top coins on coinmarketcap. I hope after checking, you will realize that many top coins in the past few years disappeared now and many of us even don't know they are used to be top coins.
this method is flawed beyond belief
its based on investing money based on "coinmarketcap" top 50
well its flawed because i can in 2 hours create 50 new altcoins all offering 20trillion coins each and buy just 1 coin from them for $1 each. and create my crapcoins to be the top 50 of coinmarketcap. based on their 'market cap' numbers
thus anyone investing, no matter what ratio per coin they want. end up buying my crap coins.
..
NEVER EVER make investments based on coinmarketcap.. its a meaningless stat.
although there may be say 19million btc in circulation. and the single price is $36k today. a coin marketcap is not a reserve store of dollars holding $684,000,000,000. . instead its just the estimated circulation multiplied by the latest price. even if the latest price was triggered by a very very small purchase.
Eg if one of my demo crapcoins mentioned above was bought for $1. it instantly creates a market cap of $1trill. but only $1 has ever changed hands.
yep its really easy to get a top listed crap coin onto number 1 spot based on 'market cap'
the real reason these 'divide your funds amongst the top 50'. is simply because the average amount of 'assets/stocks' a portfolio has is more like 25, meaning with everyone trying to pick the top 25 the crappier assets in 26-50 never get a chance,
heck if people have 5 investments in energy, utility, shares, commodities and crypto. usually only the top 5 cryptos even get a chance.
the article pretends to be wrote by 'whales' but it seems noobish as if its writing TO whales hoping some try this noobs method.
experienced traders know alot more then the article wants to give whales credit for, and many details in the article reveal the writer has not done much research
its based on investing money based on "coinmarketcap" top 50
well its flawed because i can in 2 hours create 50 new altcoins all offering 20trillion coins each and buy just 1 coin from them for $1 each. and create my crapcoins to be the top 50 of coinmarketcap. based on their 'market cap' numbers
thus anyone investing, no matter what ratio per coin they want. end up buying my crap coins.
..
NEVER EVER make investments based on coinmarketcap.. its a meaningless stat.
although there may be say 19million btc in circulation. and the single price is $36k today. a coin marketcap is not a reserve store of dollars holding $684,000,000,000. . instead its just the estimated circulation multiplied by the latest price. even if the latest price was triggered by a very very small purchase.
Eg if one of my demo crapcoins mentioned above was bought for $1. it instantly creates a market cap of $1trill. but only $1 has ever changed hands.
yep its really easy to get a top listed crap coin onto number 1 spot based on 'market cap'
the real reason these 'divide your funds amongst the top 50'. is simply because the average amount of 'assets/stocks' a portfolio has is more like 25, meaning with everyone trying to pick the top 25 the crappier assets in 26-50 never get a chance,
heck if people have 5 investments in energy, utility, shares, commodities and crypto. usually only the top 5 cryptos even get a chance.
the article pretends to be wrote by 'whales' but it seems noobish as if its writing TO whales hoping some try this noobs method.
experienced traders know alot more then the article wants to give whales credit for, and many details in the article reveal the writer has not done much research
This is a newsletter that seems to have just started, written only by whales (pros, hedge fund managers, all personal holders of >100 BTC essentially)
This article on bitcoins use in portfolio positioning of other assets I thought people may enjoy here: https://bitzur.substack.com/p/how-to-build-a-portfolio-that-moons
(Not spamming/selling anything so sorry if I'm wrong ...purely informational)
This article on bitcoins use in portfolio positioning of other assets I thought people may enjoy here: https://bitzur.substack.com/p/how-to-build-a-portfolio-that-moons
(Not spamming/selling anything so sorry if I'm wrong ...purely informational)
Jump to: