and then you crosscheck with another estimator with an easier to see structure like bitcoinfees.earn.com to see how much you need to pay per byte, for the estimated confirmation time you're comfortable with.
Strongly recommend against using
bitcoinfees.earn.com (which is the same as
bitcoinfees.21.co), especially for those that aren't familiar with Bitcoin fee estimating, bitcoinfees.21.co/bitcoinfees.earn.com suggests incorrect estimates for confirmation times.
The text delivering the "answer" is highly misleading: "The fastest and cheapest transaction fee is currently: 220 satoshis/byte" (which at this point in time is around 10 times more than an equally fast fee rate).
The site's conf-time estimate seems to erroneously deem the "cheapest and fastest" fee to be that which is paid very near to the highest within the top 1MB of it's mempool, when in fact every transaction within the top 1MB will be equally fast (yet not equally cheap).
It's likely no coincidence that 200 sat/byte transactions are heavily represented in the typical Bitcoin mempool. Very little mempool space is occupied inbetween this so called "cheapest and fastest" threshold and the lowest fee within the top 1 MB of the mempool (which is 10 times lower than 200 sat/byte right now).
Their method for calculating fees therefore always presents users with a false impression of confirmation times, and likely distorts the fee market against the user's interests. I am most embarrassed to have recommended this website in the past.
Thanks for pointing that out... I confess I haven't been looking at the explanation paragraphs below the main charts for months and you're right. The graphs themselves are still helpful, I've always used the estimation with confirmation times that more or less correspond. But the "cheapest and fastest" estimation is definitely far from accurate, at least it is right now.
I've been recommending this estimator for months now so am as guilty for possibly getting other users to pay more fees than needed. Complacency...
I do note that the graphs themselves are still a useful tool but now should find something more representative.
Then: a*180 + b*34 + 10 +/- 1
Unless you are using uncompressed public keys (and very few wallets do this anymore), the input multiplier will be 148 instead of 180.
I learn something new every day here, thanks for pointing that out!