If a pool is using modified software then it is entirely possible they could decide to reject txs with zero fees and accept an alternative tx spending the same UTXOs that does have fees (although I'm not sure if any pool is actually doing this at the moment).
You would have to be able to send such a "replacement" tx directly to the pool though as any standard nodes that have seen the first tx will simply reject the second as a double-spend attempt and not forward it to their other peers.
If your coins are "stuck" this is typically due to having paid zero tx fees and the UTXOs are either of too low value or age to qualify to be included in a block (if you are running an old client it might keep sending out the invalid tx so you might want to look into how to get rid of the tx from your wallet if this is the case).
Also the online gambling sites are not stupid enough to lose money from unconfirmed txs so this approach is not going to be a method to make money from them (it is only most likely to succeed for some small physical purchase if a store decides to accept 0 confirmations).
how is that sending a replacement transaction? sorry i cant understand it clearly for i am not a techy guy
If I read him right he's suggesting that if your your coins are stuck because some paricular node has rejected your tx attempt and isn't forwarding it then you may be able to "fix" it by sending another tx with a proper fee. The idea is that first tx attempt fades into oblivion and the second one gets hashed into a block. "replacement" because the second attempt is meant to replace the first.
It also seems to me that you could possibly simply replay the blockchain in a fresh wallet after importing your keys. The fresh wallet wouldn't know about the stuck tx unders the assumption that it wasn't broadcast to the network. I may be mistaken tho.