Well, that is YOUR opinion. If I find the need to verify or change my address for any reason, I can't. There is a delay for payout while blocks are confirmed. If I just switch pools, I may not get paid if I can't login and set the payout threshold low enough to trigger a payment when my work is confirmed. Bitcoins, while a recent invention, is money and there is a duty to make this safe and secure and accessible. Granted, pooling is all new and if you keep the payout threshold low and keep a close eye on things, the risk of loss is also low.
Fair enough. I take the view that much more of the responsibility for this lies with us than with Slush (or other pool operators). We need to make sure that our mining operations are safe, and rely less on pool operators. For example (and this doesn't apply to you, or, indeed, to Slush) one operator is promising to notify participants when one of their miners goes down. I think this is... not a mistake, but is perhaps less helpful than it sounds. What I think is needed is for participants to monitor their miners locally, rather than relying on pool operators. Operators should provide services like this with large disclaimers and warnings that pool participants have responsibility for monitoring their own operations.
As far as your mountain out of a molehill comment; that is off base as I didn't say anything about it being a major problem. At the moment, it is annoying (and it is already back up). However, when hackers get in [as they did with, was it BitcoinPool?], then it is a big deal if you don't keep close watch. This becomes real money for people and as such, the pools should be maintained with that in mind.
Slush promised to work on it and I am happy with that for now. I just reported the outage. He should have monitoring software to report it to him on its own so that users don't have to report, but perhaps that is part of his upcoming solution. The only other item I mentioned is a dedicated forum for each pool. I suggested on their sites, but it could be here if they want to create that many .. or perhaps a few for the bigger pools and an "Other" for the smaller pools.
There was no building of mountains here. Slush is the pool I started with and the pool I am currently using. That will not change for awhile now [unless there is a pool outage]. It seems my work is somehow disappearing in small amounts (seemingly network related, but doesn't explain the share count differences between my client and the statistics onsite) when I use deepbit, so I am doing a long test with slush for now since I am overdue for the long term stats anyway. Also, I like the idea of scoring (modified proportional really).
There is an awful lot of trust involved with pooled mining and even more so when server security and stability is at stake. So, I care. Sorry if you think that is a mountain.
Well, apologies if you object to the "mountains" comment. I made it because you started a new thread to discuss an issue that was already being discussed elsewhere. It wasn't clear to me what, if any, information Slush could give you that you weren't already aware of. That was why I tried to find out what, exactly, concerned you.
I think we agree on more than we disagree on, we just have different approaches to the issues we face.