Topic: Huge difference PC 1900 h\s , on nanopool 900 h\s calculated (monero) (Read 332 times)
October 07, 2017, 12:13:46 PM
tnx!
October 05, 2017, 08:21:10 AM
Commonly there are some hash difference between pool and mining rig shows, because pool roughly estimate hashrate based on accepted shared.
Comparing average hashrate calculated for long time, there will be less difference.
Otherwise, check your mining rig OC status or internet line status if it is making some rejected shares.
Comparing average hashrate calculated for long time, there will be less difference.
Otherwise, check your mining rig OC status or internet line status if it is making some rejected shares.
October 04, 2017, 06:55:41 PM
1. Count your coins to work out if you're being paid according to your miner reported hashrate.
2. Post a picture of your hash graphs - miningpoolhub.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=graphs
3. Forget pool side hashrate - it's generally not accurate
2. Post a picture of your hash graphs - miningpoolhub.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=graphs
3. Forget pool side hashrate - it's generally not accurate
October 04, 2017, 06:34:55 PM
Hi
i use claymore for monero
3 cards that total produce 1900 h cryptonight
but on nanopool website on 6 hour average only 900 h calculated
where 1000 h dissapered ?
the fees is only 3%, where rest is gone?
i use claymore for monero
3 cards that total produce 1900 h cryptonight
but on nanopool website on 6 hour average only 900 h calculated
where 1000 h dissapered ?
the fees is only 3%, where rest is gone?
Jump to: