Author

Topic: HyperQuant, LaneAxis, Ubex, Credits - You're being SCAMMED (Read 158 times)

newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
My view on it is simple, ICOs are scam, youtube reviewers most are trash and just do it for money you can watch them for fun, if you invest in ico then you are not investor...
It's not that all of them are scams, just most won't make it. But the ones that succeed will contribute to the progress of the blockchain ecosystem and technology as a whole. So, although a big chunk of the money will go to waste, there are still positives in it, imo
full member
Activity: 406
Merit: 100
BAILOUT
My view on it is simple, ICOs are scam, youtube reviewers most are trash and just do it for money you can watch them for fun, if you invest in ico then you are not investor...
legendary
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1029
How the Biggest ICOs are Being Scammed and Lose Investors’ Money by Getting Ripped off by YouTubers



As we are in the middle of another market slump, an investigation published by ICO-Refund.com (disclaimer - I'm one of their affiliates) in article on Medium shows how YouTubers are buying cheap fake followers, likes, and views and use the false numbers and pretend audience/influence to take thousands of dollars for a short “review” from many of the ICOs, even the biggest ones out there, including HyperQuant, LaneAxis, Ubex, Credits and more.

You can see the influx of shady Youtube ‘influencers’ in the Telegram groups of the ICOs, trying to get paid directly by them for a “good review”.

The funny thing is that how some of them are complete frauds with no real media influence and are literally stealing the money of the ICOs.


It raises questions about the competency of the projects at least in their marketing departments because it is more than obvious that some of the Youtube channels they have paid to be promoted on are fake. It also makes you wonder about the other methods that ICOs use in order to make their projects more popular and exactly how much of the money that their investors have contributed to them is wasted for corruption and bribes, buying videos, articles, and ratings from shady and unknown individuals.

One of the discussed YouTubers has been made 114 or so paid Youtube “Reviews” within a timeframe of a 1 month which is crazy.  The author of the article estimates that the Youtube channel owner has made about $170k for that period and he has tricked most of the bigger ICOs at the moment to pay him to “review” their project in front of his fake followers and viewers.



What's your view on it?
It looks possible and as far as i know not only youtube but it looks like there was so many people are using the social accounts with fake followers. Facebook has a very strict rules and it's a little bit difficult to use fake friends on there. I never believe about twitter audit because i'm seeing there is a lot of accounts that use the fake followers can pass the audit.
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
How the Biggest ICOs are Being Scammed and Lose Investors’ Money by Getting Ripped off by YouTubers



As we are in the middle of another market slump, an investigation published by ICO-Refund.com (disclaimer - I'm one of their affiliates) in article on Medium shows how YouTubers are buying cheap fake followers, likes, and views and use the false numbers and pretend audience/influence to take thousands of dollars for a short “review” from many of the ICOs, even the biggest ones out there, including HyperQuant, LaneAxis, Ubex, Credits and more.

You can see the influx of shady Youtube ‘influencers’ in the Telegram groups of the ICOs, trying to get paid directly by them for a “good review”.

The funny thing is that how some of them are complete frauds with no real media influence and are literally stealing the money of the ICOs.


It raises questions about the competency of the projects at least in their marketing departments because it is more than obvious that some of the Youtube channels they have paid to be promoted on are fake. It also makes you wonder about the other methods that ICOs use in order to make their projects more popular and exactly how much of the money that their investors have contributed to them is wasted for corruption and bribes, buying videos, articles, and ratings from shady and unknown individuals.

One of the discussed YouTubers has been made 114 or so paid Youtube “Reviews” within a timeframe of a 1 month which is crazy.  The author of the article estimates that the Youtube channel owner has made about $170k for that period and he has tricked most of the bigger ICOs at the moment to pay him to “review” their project in front of his fake followers and viewers.



What's your view on it?
Jump to: