My opposition is not because they are trying to hard fork
not because they are trying to increase the block size to 8 MB and open up many attack vectors.
not because they are effectively centralizing bitcoin.
not because they have the biggest scammer as their speaker.
not because they have been attacking bitcoin and trying to take over for more than 3 years.
...
these are all minor reasons.
the main reason that i am against bitcoinCash is because they are going against the majority. we voted, the nodes, the miners, the businesses, ... and got the majority on the current chain that you see and is called bitcoin.
but you could not accept and did not respect the majority's opinion and still insist on your minority hard fork.
and the worst part is you are going against "satoshi's vision", the very thing you pretend to support. which is a decentralized system that works based on consensus of the majority not what some small group of people want.
and here is a question for you:
you say your proposal is the best, you claim to be the satoshi's vision, and lots more. so why don't you make something from scratch? call it Satoshi's Vistion Coin or SVC for short.
Okay, and what would you like people to
do with this information, exactly? Smile and nod? You can be opposed to whatever you like, but they're still perfectly entitled to do what they're doing. I have no particular interest in BCC, but I won't abide people trying to tell others what software they can or can't freely choose to run. You don't like Bitcoin Cash? Great, don't run it. That's about as far as your opposition goes, aside from expressing your dissatisfaction about it here on the internet, which doesn't carry a lot of weight.
You seem to have some unique ideas about what consensus means, so I'll clarify that for you. Firstly, just because the miners agreed on SegWit2x, that doesn't necessarily mean everyone did. There are some people on these forums who like to make the argument that miners are the only important nodes, but I don't subscribe to that notion. So it should be made quite clear that most non-mining nodes are not running the /btc1 code which the miners likely are. It's far from a unanimous decision.
Further to that point, even
if 99% of the participants are running the same code (they aren't, but still), if you are part of the remaining 1% who doesn't agree with that code,
no one can put a gun to your head and force you to run it. Consensus
doesn't mean you are required by some sort of law to follow along for the ride. You are absolutely, 100%, completely free to fork away at any point you choose to. That's your inalienable right in a permissionless environment. You are therefore not in a position to deny that right to others.
Also, in case it wasn't obvious, consensus can only be achieved by actually
running code. Sure, it's unlikely consensus would ever result in BCC building the longest chain, but if they don't release the code to find out for sure, how would we ever know? You can't preempt consensus. It's not your call to make. So just relax and let the chips fall where they may.
Lastly, as for why they don't make something from scratch, again, the answer is "permissionless" and "open source". Try and stop them. That's right, you can't. They can do whatever they want, as can you. I, for one, am more than a little tired of hearing about what everyone thinks Satoshi's vision is. The only thing I can tell you is that Satoshi probably wasn't some tyrannical "thought-police" despotic type who likes telling people what to do. Maybe everyone could incorporate a little more of that part of his vision and stop pretending to speak for them.