Yes! we are in a bitcoin forum and it is presumed that generally 99% is always about bitcoin.
But if you use in your title:
Re: I am concerned about the dangers of KYC, but how do you do business...
And OP:
Topic inspired by this excellent post: Why KYC is extremely dangerous – and useless
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/why-kyc-is-extremely-dangerous-and-useless-5221497I am concerned about the dangers of KYC, but
how do you do business in the USA (and many other places) without it? To be clear, individuals cannot use vital services without obeying the requests, and businesses cannot exist without obeying the SEC rules. We need new ways to help
BTC go mainstream without all the BS. Any ideas?
At no time do you mention bitcoin or even cryptocurrencies. Let's go! It's about how you handle information and what kind of business you do. (please understand my point)
By not placing after "business ..." nothing specific, to unleash the use of any currency, Fiat or cryptographic, even other types of payment.
...
Fiat.In the 100% of "serious" businesses that Fiat involves, you need KYC.
But we go to the most earthly or "common" (working class) in their day to day, buy in the e-commerce (eg) they do not ask for KYC but you pay with credit card, so, what I call the KYC in disguise.
So what happens? You cannot do business without KYC.
Companies like Paypal (for...not to make the story so long) emerged in the late 90s, but it had its boom in the early 21st century, names such as Neteller, Skrill, etc. can be added. The traditional Wallets dominated the Internet shopping boom.
At that time, the issue of access to privileged information by those with whom you did business began to become massive, yes! massive! that is to say, you were no longer a few (the pioneers of the cryptogram, experts users ...) who worried about how our information was available with and without consent.
Those traditional wallets served to prevent third parties with whom we did business from accessing personal information.
But
You had to "do or do" KYC with these companies, the positive (if this qualification fits) is that the privileged information was reduced to one, to do business with many.
Opinion based on my experience with this type of KYC:
I think there are at least more than 50 traditional wallets that are still used today, which can be called reliable, of those I have used at least 8 of the most popular, that is, in some I did KYC, more than 20 years ago, until today I have had no problems.
KYC is not okay, but when there is no other alternative, try common sense in conjunction with very good information.
... Bitcoin.
Simple, It is not KYC, although here if there is YES and
No.