Author

Topic: I found a block but only transaction it contains is the 25 BTC mining award??? (Read 989 times)

hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 509
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
Thanks for posting this. It helps a lot of people from being worried.
Kindly,
       Muhammed Zakhir
sr. member
Activity: 442
Merit: 250
Found Lost beach - quiet now
Congratulations !!! with difficulty at an all time high (so far) I think it's really cool you solved a block !!
Thanks. By the way, enjoyed you in Mission Impossible!  Wink
hero member
Activity: 577
Merit: 504
This block was, by chance, found only 39 seconds after the previous one. It is likely that no new transactions were made during that time. These blocks are still useful, as they made it more difficult to double-spend previous transactions.

Exactly.

Block #304223 was found on 2014-06-04 15:55:01.
https://blockchain.info/block-index/437709

Block #304222 was found on 2014-06-04 15:54:22.
https://blockchain.info/block-index/437708
legendary
Activity: 4536
Merit: 3188
Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023
This block was, by chance, found only 39 seconds after the previous one. It is likely that no new transactions were made during that time. These blocks are still useful, as they made it more difficult to double-spend previous transactions.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
It's about time -- All merrit accepted !!!
Congratulations !!! with difficulty at an all time high (so far) I think it's really cool you solved a block !!
member
Activity: 101
Merit: 10
I am curious, can someone run a quick script and find out the number of blocks that have no transactions?  Would be an interesting statistic/graph, especially displayed over time (% empty vs time).  I expect this was more common in the early days, less common now.  More common a while back when there was a botnet doing it on purpose, etc.
doesnt sound to complicated to create
All you need is the blockchain API, right?
Make a thread!
legendary
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1137
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
I am curious, can someone run a quick script and find out the number of blocks that have no transactions?  Would be an interesting statistic/graph, especially displayed over time (% empty vs time).  I expect this was more common in the early days, less common now.  More common a while back when there was a botnet doing it on purpose, etc.
member
Activity: 101
Merit: 10
Im sure you will still be credited for that block
It's no worries, it happens sometimes
full member
Activity: 225
Merit: 100
This actually is common. I have been on a few pools and have found previous blocks where this has happened. At least you found a block, which is very difficult.
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
Yes this can happen sometimes. It's allowed because it's not rational over the long term from a game theory perspective. E.g. if all the miners decided to mine blocks with zero transactions simply for the block reward, then no transactions would flow through the network.

With no transactions the network would be useless and then the reward would be worthless.

Thankfully, it's not any harder to mine a block with transactions than without[1], so this shouldn't be a problem long term.

[1] Other than the fact that larger blocks can take a longer time to transfer across the network.
legendary
Activity: 4228
Merit: 1313
Miners can include transactions or not. Some pools do not include any to decrease propagation time.  It can also happen if there were no transactions to include, for example if blocks are found close together.
member
Activity: 910
Merit: 10
 Shocked
nothing to worry  Grin
sometimes its happen  Grin  Grin
sr. member
Activity: 442
Merit: 250
Found Lost beach - quiet now
While mining in the slush pool, I was credited with finding my first block (304223). Who-WA!

But when I look at it on blockchain it shows 0 transaction volume and 0 fees. The only transaction listed is the 25 BTC mining award. I've never seen a block like this before and didn't think it could happen since the purpose of mining is to create blocks of transactions. Is this unique or does it happen a lot?
Jump to: