I saw that there was a campaign of fight among account from Indonesia against rozak. Rozak catches them and they start looking for rozak's fault. LOL
This time he apparently disrupted the life of the Turkish section. Since the OP writes there and came here almost two weeks later to "annoy" Rozak.
As for your questions, if there is compelling evidence of the link between alternative accounts and their violation in the participation of companies where the participation of alts is prohibited, the accounts may be marked with a negative trust.
Simply transferring tokens to one wallet cannot be hard evidence. We still need other matches, the same social networks, wallets, transfer of merit between accounts, and so on.
Anything else is a simple attack on the account without reliable evidence.