Topic: I want to make a group against foolish, poor knowledge campaign manager,join it. (Read 2074 times)

Instead of getting butthurt from being denied from those campaign why don't you make it as an inspiration to do more better job, and also if a campaign manager denie's that really means that your post quality is bad and needs to improve, and you better closed this thread mate so you will not create more confusion and so campaign managers will not mark you as banned member in their campaigns

Yes. Good hints. lakisis(OP) typed a space between a word and comma, such as: "beat him badly ," and "this forum ,".

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16172824

So does BitDiscussion, such as:"group ," and "campaign ,".

Mod you have very strong observation. And SFR10 and yahoo are due diligent to check post quality, they are good managers

i told in the first if someone do not want complaint from high rank account you complaint from other newbie account. i think people are worry about his high rank account because they are all post from newbie account its solid proof.

Yeah right, shill account.   

OP, how many suckers do you have in your little butthurt brigade?   I'm going to guess there's you and...you. 

Give it up.

Ignore.

there is a Manager SFR10 is very foolish and nonsense SFR10 have no knowledge that how to mange a campaign i want to say like other members he just need novel writer for his campaign and they people are also foolish and nonsense who hire SFR10 for manage the campaign and you can check the future of SAFEDICE is going to finish.

I sense a butthurt sig campaign reject.

Why don't you tell us, who this "foolish" campaign manager is? Is there really was a problem with them, we would all agree. But we aren't. I'm sure if you asked the campaign manager why you got kicked. They would say that you have a shitty post quality. Simple.

There is no right way to manage a signature campaign, as they aren't regulated. To think otherwise is very stupid.

It varies every campaign, and depends on the manager. Spam campaigns like YoBit and secondstrade won't care about past post history. Generally, they look for members with a good post quality though.

Again, there is no right way to maintain a spreadsheet. Does the manager of the campaign not manage it the "right?" way? Join a different campaign.

If you were the owner of a restaurant and needed to hire cooks, would you rather hire one that has good experience already, or would you hire one that might not cook very well, or has no experience? Would you be even willing to risk hiring a really bad cook? Probably not.

Because those threads are basically people echoing each other, and has no value. Some sections aren't included since they probably aren't good for advertising, or have spam. Would a fully english dice site want to advertise in the French section? No. If you ran a restaurant business, you would want to advertise to people who eat at restaurants, not people who insist on cooking everyting at home. Again, if you don't like the terms, don't join.

---

There are many campaigns to chose from. If you don't like a campaign manager or how it is managed, simply don't join the campaign. Most people that complain are probably those rejected from good campaigns because they have bad post quality.

Wow. Good example by having excellent observation.

I want to add to what others have said, have you even tried to manage a campaign before? then you will also understand that they are doing a great job by putting their names and reputation on the line. BUt if you have grudge against anyone I suggest you take it up with him and not generalise... My humble opinion...

Unfortunately there are very few signature campaigns that are run by a bot like Yobit, Bitmixer and now deceased (yeah a bad term but I like to use it) Coinsbank signature. These signature have of course managers that they watch the users, I am specifically talking about Yobit here run by Hilarious and co which he removes non english speakers, one liners and spammers. A great job in my view. However he didn't do the selection as the process was automatic, every user was accepted and if he was good he continued, if he did one of the three things named above he would get removed real quick from Hilariousandco the manager of the campaign. This is how a good manager must behave, give a chance to every one on trail and without any mercy to remove those who are not fit. This is not personal, its just business, if you can promote the brand well they will keep you, if you do more harm then good then they will ban or kick you out of the campaign.

No,it's not.From the people I had known over years,no campaign manager is actually dependent on the signature management earnings.They do it because they can.No one finds pleasure in sitting front of the computer for 8 hours reading the series of opinions (and shit posts).

well OP didn't mentioned the manage's names in this thread but in his previous posts. I saw he have problems with Yahoo and SFR10.
I think his account got rejected from their campaign because of low quality posts. now he want to ruin their reputation. but he may don't know these guys gain that trust after hard work of years.. it can;t be  vanished in 1 day. and without any valid reason

Judging by your actions(spamming at sig campaigns threads,using alts,opening threads in the wrong section) i can say that whoever rejected you took the right decision,it's funny to see that your lame attempt to ruin other's reputation has backfired,well played.

another novel writer

Well i think you are out of your mind posting this shit here. Campaign Managers here are doing great job and are respected by all the Members of this Forum. They have done hard work and due to this reason ,every new campaign wish to hire them and not try for a new campaign manager.

I do not agree with OP. To manage a campaign is a full time job which require that you select people on merit. The better you filter applicants based on their posts, the better the job is fulfilled as Campaign manager.

1. yes op has the right to express his feelings but he is wrong. attacking  someone without proper reason is wrong, although op didnot mention the manager's name specifically.
2. if you know some managers who are not doing their work properly then you should mention their name also. lol. let us also know  who is that manager. btw, i think that you were also kicked out  from a campaign by some manager  in the past, so you are posting like this. anyway, you are free to prove me wrong.

I believe he is right and everyone has his right to say or express his feelings . I also agree with him as there are some campaign managers not doing their job properly and can not figure out why do they mismanage things . However the OP made me smile when I read this . I think building a group is not going to help us out , however someone had to take an initiative and I appreciate this .

I have also seen that one of the users was complaining that one of the campaign manager rejected him for not posting in a gap and timing , what does he mean that the users of this forum should give full time to this forum and post in every hour so that they should not be doing their daily life work,

Checking the quality of the post is ok, but rejecting for not posting in a gap - i dont understand this point is valid or not.

This is a welcome development, i agree with you 100%

Op this is ridiculous.You are blaming campaign managers because you were rejected by them.Almost all of us have been rejected for some campaigns but we do not harbor any bad feelings towards campaign managers because we know they rejected us because what according to them was in the best interest of campaign they are managing.Please stop complaining

Don't be butthurt OP just respect the managers decision and make it as a challenge to improve your post quality and be more active enough so you wouldn't miss some days of posting, managers want's their participant to be active enough to post on behalf of their site advertising aswell as they want also quality poster who doesn't give a shit and stain bad on their site. So for now better move on you cannot get support for people here since they know the reason why you acted like this.

Selection criteria must be the root cause for this thread.

I have seen some campaign managers are rejecting applicants for the reason of not having posts for a particular board / not having big gaps between post timing. But these are acceptable criteria for a participant not for an applicant.

Campaign manager should not expect born-fit applicants, but they must be giving chances at least on trail basis like 5 to 10 posts with 2 days of time, failing to follow the criteria must result in disqualification with zero payments.

For a trail, applicant's last 20 or 40 or even 60 posts (2 or 3 pages of profile's showPosts ) must be free from spam with decent length and not too old.

Do I miss anything here that will give room to a spammer ? I like to have discussion on this idea.

Lol if you are referring to SFR10, SFR10 is a good campaign manager. you do not need to write a novel to get to his signature campaign. Every Signature Campaign manager wants a participants who knows how to write "Constructive Sentence". If you got rejected it means that you need to improve the way how you post. Take it as a challenge and apply again to him next time.

I could not understand the purpose of forming a group here.
But I like the idea of having a discussion against campaign managers' meaningless behaviors.

I like to have a common discussion board where we can discuss / justify the actions of campaign mangers.
So far members have complained to same thread and but that never got discussed publicly. (maybe the reason of signature threads are not covered in most of campaigns )


I like to suggest to open a service discussion for how a campaign must be managed in a right way, like

- What are the selection criteria / how much important past post history
- How a spread sheet must be maintained
- Why trail basis are not given commonly
- Why some threads are marked as spam and why some sections are is not included regardless of gambling /altcoin campaigns but for same campaign manager.

He's obviously an alt of OP. Just look at the way they type and the spaces between the commas. Quite pathetic.

And You know all the rules of the forum right? LOL... you don't even know which post should be posted in which section/board..
this is Service section and there is people posts somthing to pay someone for their jobs and services. (make me correct if you are paying trolls to join your group. LOL)..
Move your Thread to reputation section and do whatever you want to do you stupid Retard..
(Oh. do you know how to move a thread BTW? hehehe)


LOL. what do you know about campaigns and campaign managers you newbie with 3 posts? (what was your high ranked shit poster account which got rejection from SFR10?)

don't follow this op
this him is very sick and very bad attitude
this him is not active this forum can see grafic in profile
this him this first follow signature campaign and rejceted and him agry and very sick because apply in rejected

ignore.

I like you and lets do this.

How many guys do you need?
I have 15 skinny bouncers at your disposal.

Lakisis made a comment related to my application at SafeDice campaign (here), so I think that correct answer is SFR10, the campaign manager at SafeDice.
I advised him to keep it nice, but he seems to be too angry to do the right thing.
Quite shame, I doubt that any campaign manager would like him around after this story.

Are you referring someone specifically or just an outrage against all the campaign managers ? If you have a problem with specific campaign manager,please call out the names instead of beating around the bush.Who is it? Yahoo ,Lutpin,SFR10,Gianluca ?

What are you planning to do with your group ? Give a hard to all your members from participating in any signature campaigns in the future ?

him? are you talking about yahoo62278? According this topic https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/list-of-best-campaign-managers-in-bct-0962016-1609687 he's the best campaign manager for now, you are also can read about history campaigns which he managed.

Lol. So I'm guessing you weren't accepted onto a campaign hence the butthurt vigilantism? Looking at your post history I'd say the person who denied you was doing their job properly and if every other campaign did this the entire forum would be better as a result. I suggest swallowing your pride and improving your posts then try again but this immature behaviour isn't going to get you anywhere but turn more people against you.

Its Time to take Stand about nonsense and poor knowledge and foolish campaign manager, there is a lot of foolish and poor knowledge campaign manager they have no knowledge about the rule of this forum and they do not know that how manage a campaign and lets join my my group with bravely and beat him badly , i think these type manager want to destroy signature campaign and destroying this forum , let make  a power against him.

Edit

I am opening this post in order to post against any manager who do any mistake or do any miss behave because of his rulership over the forum in sense of campaign manager. so if you find that there is any fault in any signature manager then you will complaint against then here, and if someone do not want complaint from high rank account or real account you can make other newbie account and then complaint from your newbie account.