Read the AICoin whitepaper if you can. The way they handle tokens is the most appealing I have seen to date.
In general I try to assert whether or not there is a real/functional product to be had in the future. I also try to assert whether or not the ICO founders have an incentive to run with the funds instead of completing or working on their product.
In general I try to assert whether or not there is a real/functional product to be had in the future. I also try to assert whether or not the ICO founders have an incentive to run with the funds instead of completing or working on their product.
I will certainly read it, thank you so much! I have a doubt: how would you assert whether or not the founders will run with the funds?
I mean, that's totally not our intention... but this is a question that I always put on myself since I started thinking about it....
But generally I try to gauge the probability of a product being deployable and creating revenue in the near future, try to assert how much revenue/profits that would make and then compare it against the potential funding received through an ICO or similar. If there's is substantially more money to be had in the near future by simply working on the promised project, then that's a huge plus for me when making decisions regarding an investment.
As to measure the advantages and disadvantages, if you want to include ico who have insensitive and funds are interested so that the product they are also there's reciprocity is at getting insensitive and true if there are funds for investment better it looks like.
Thank you for replying! May I ask what you mean with "insensitive"?
