I do not really understand the advantages of having such a large number of tokens, and part reservation.
From the point of view of the investor's position, you can throw away the balance and blur the share for sale.
Topic: ICO Token Metrics (Read 441 times)
It seems to be a standard thing for many to work out the math re ICO investment consideration involving Token metrics.
Factors involved, amount project looking to raise, payment method, currency token price based on, amount of total tokens, circulation, percentage of tokens available in sale. Market cap. Token initial cost.
Obviously idea and vision play factor etc..
How do you correlate the above factors to consider if all tie in as worth-while investment?
There have been differences to consideration if using the above IMO, such as PowerLedger, with uncapped ICO, no final token value known. Yet, maybe moreso the strength of idea, vision supporting.
Could anyone give a hypothetical example using the above factors I am seeing constantly being correlated to work out if worth considering investment?
Factors involved, amount project looking to raise, payment method, currency token price based on, amount of total tokens, circulation, percentage of tokens available in sale. Market cap. Token initial cost.
Obviously idea and vision play factor etc..
How do you correlate the above factors to consider if all tie in as worth-while investment?
There have been differences to consideration if using the above IMO, such as PowerLedger, with uncapped ICO, no final token value known. Yet, maybe moreso the strength of idea, vision supporting.
Could anyone give a hypothetical example using the above factors I am seeing constantly being correlated to work out if worth considering investment?
Jump to: