Topic: ICO's success partly is determined by the token sale schema (Read 328 times)
common guys, I need your thoughts
Hello wanted to discuss the following moment.
I noticed that more sophisticated or distinctive from others token sale schemas attract more attention, which leads to bigger contributions, no matter what is the project itself and its technical details (with equal other things like the team, advisors, experience, MVP, token structure, token distribution, adding to exchanges etc).
For example, EOS suggested to conduct the token sale during the year, Kyber network used white lists. And it all attracted some hype.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.
What other interesting token sale structures do you know?
I noticed that more sophisticated or distinctive from others token sale schemas attract more attention, which leads to bigger contributions, no matter what is the project itself and its technical details (with equal other things like the team, advisors, experience, MVP, token structure, token distribution, adding to exchanges etc).
For example, EOS suggested to conduct the token sale during the year, Kyber network used white lists. And it all attracted some hype.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.
What other interesting token sale structures do you know?
True story. Also it's worth to menceon Tezos and BAT - what are their key point of tokensales?
I think they just had excellent ideas and experienced teams, nothing to do with token sale structure
Hello wanted to discuss the following moment.
I noticed that more sophisticated or distinctive from others token sale schemas attract more attention, which leads to bigger contributions, no matter what is the project itself and its technical details (with equal other things like the team, advisors, experience, MVP, token structure, token distribution, adding to exchanges etc).
For example, EOS suggested to conduct the token sale during the year, Kyber network used white lists. And it all attracted some hype.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.
What other interesting token sale structures do you know?
I noticed that more sophisticated or distinctive from others token sale schemas attract more attention, which leads to bigger contributions, no matter what is the project itself and its technical details (with equal other things like the team, advisors, experience, MVP, token structure, token distribution, adding to exchanges etc).
For example, EOS suggested to conduct the token sale during the year, Kyber network used white lists. And it all attracted some hype.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.
What other interesting token sale structures do you know?
True story. Also it's worth to menceon Tezos and BAT - what are their key point of tokensales?
Hello wanted to discuss the following moment.
I noticed that more sophisticated or distinctive from others token sale schemas attract more attention, which leads to bigger contributions, no matter what is the project itself and its technical details (with equal other things like the team, advisors, experience, MVP, token structure, token distribution, adding to exchanges etc).
For example, EOS suggested to conduct the token sale during the year, Kyber network used white lists. And it all attracted some hype.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.
What other interesting token sale structures do you know?
I noticed that more sophisticated or distinctive from others token sale schemas attract more attention, which leads to bigger contributions, no matter what is the project itself and its technical details (with equal other things like the team, advisors, experience, MVP, token structure, token distribution, adding to exchanges etc).
For example, EOS suggested to conduct the token sale during the year, Kyber network used white lists. And it all attracted some hype.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.
What other interesting token sale structures do you know?
Jump to: