Topic: If "Bitcoin Core" and Bitcoin Cash bilaterally split (Read 227 times)

No, you do not speak for the Core developers and it is open to argument. It the Bitcoin Cash people who want to believe that it was a bilateral split.

But it does not matter what you believe. Bitcoin has access to coins of all altcoin forks, including Bitcoin Cash.


Yes. Go tell Roger Ver to stop all his drama.


But is it the real Bitcoin Cash following "Satoshi's vision"? Why won't you answer?


Now you know how it feels. Roger Ver is doing the same to Bitcoin. If the Bitcoin Cash community had clear heads, they would understand that they have to throw Roger Ver out. They do not need him.


If I have lowered myself then Roger Ver has to be in the lowest. Throw him out of the Bitcoin Cash community. You do not need him. He is a fraud like his ally Craig Wright, who he claims as the real Satoshi Nakamoto.


Bitcoin refers to the cryptocurrency you call "Bitcoin Core", in short Bitcoin is Bitcoin. You cannot change that, but you are free to call your altcoin Bitcoin Cash which refers to the coin "Bcash".

there are many forks pretending to be the real coins. Same thing that bitcoin cash does to bitcoin. Few people like infamous roger ver are trying to hijack the bitcoin for his fork..

botcoin core and bitcoin cash did bilateral split. even the actual devs of core/cash admit this. and so do the actual devs of bitcoin cash.

as for the fanboys/mouthpieces of both sides that have not even coded a line of code. they are just causing drama and distraction.
this also includes this new "clashic" attempt

anyway windfury. it seems you have taken a edited image from somewhere.. and the use of an edited image is obvious propaganda and misdirection.

you have really lowered yourself into the propaganda rabbit hole with such edits and manipulation just to cause more distraction about social drama events rather then let the community understand the important things about decentralisation/protocol/network changes that really matter

---

---

so to clarify the actual events

BOTH bitcoin core and bitcoin cash, bilaterally split. core side set up the bip 9, bip 148 processes to allow it and they got their partner at bloq to cause it. all to avoid a real consensus event because from a consensus point of view core only had on average 35% of the vote from january to august. and they were hating that fact.
they needed to deport the opposition because they didnt see it as a fair community consensus competition, whereby core would need to compromise later on to give then give the community something that could get majority vote. they seen it as an attack against the core roadmap and thus needed to get rid of the votes abstaining/rejecting the core roadmap. (its called tyranny/oppression)

148

---

---

as for this new clashic propaganda. and the newest social drama distraction.. it reaks of false and obvious agenda from the core fanboys trying to introduce more confusion.

when will the core fanboys wake up and stop fanboying over core team. and instead think about the decentralised bitcoin ecosystem that sits beyond their core mindsets.

P.S
i detest core. but that does not mean i should get pigeon holed into another team. if your mindset is that if someone detests A they must be team B. you really have missed the whole point of decentralisation and independance. i am neither team.

my mindset is in the decentralised peer-to-peer currency that has no authoritarian/monarch/tyranic controlling team. but it seems too many people are trying real hard to make core be king ruler

theymos and ver are the same drama. promoting their sites as the portal to make people think that their team owns bitcoin
adam back and craig are the same drama. promoting they were involved in inventing bitcoin with satoshi, yet neither wrote any bitcoin code during satoshis era

gmaxwell/pwuille and jgarzic/gavin are the same drama coding the nodes to cause the split all to cause segwit to activate and later use to try brand grabbing

..
no one should own the brand.
no one
ill make it clear. NO ONE!!!

the solution is simple. think of it the same way as the dollar. which is another financial brand not ownd by a community
if someone asks for a dollar. you respond: " is that american dollar(USD) or canadian dollar(CAD)
if someone asks for a bitcoin. you respond: " is that bitcoin core(btc) or bitcoin cash(bch)

then the confusion is lifted
have a nice day

Bitcoin cash is not bitcoin. Roger ver and bitcoin.com has been pushing that bitcoincash is bitcoin. It has been shown in the website and this is their way of luring new investors to buy bitcoin cash instead of bitcoin. They have been asking coinmarketcap to publish that bitcoin should be termed as bitcoin core but it never was. Bitcoin cash is a forked coin. I hope people will see that.

there is always 1 bitcoin and 1 bitcoin alone. if some small group of people choose to call that 1 bitcoin as something else like bitcoin core it doesn't make it something else. it is still bitcoin. and this bitcoin is the chain that has the majority support. the majority of hashrate, the majority of nodes, the majority of merchants and users,....

when someone makes a fork out of bitcoin they can become bitcoin if they can gain that majority support. like Segregated Witness soft fork in 2017, or the P2SH soft fork in a couple of years ago, or the first and only hard fork that bitcoin had in 2009 or 2010. it had the majority support and it became bitcoin.

when they can not gain that majority support they become altcoins. usually they are abandoned like many proposals that were shut down in the past like decreasing the time between blocks (suggested by Charlie Lee in early days which made him create LTC=another coin), or increasing the block size.
unfortunately some people can not accept defeat. they will come back and try ruining everything because they didn't get what they wanted!!!

well, it's been such a long time, no one ever mentioned them ever.

We should tell the that Bitcoin is the cryptocurrency they call "Bitcoin Core", in short "Bitcoin is Bitcoin". Which is true. The word Bitcoin always refers to BTC not BCH.


I believe Roger Ver's motivation is deeper than greed. He sometimes sounds like a sociopath. I don't know why franky1 can support someone like him.


Because "Bitcoin Cash is Bitcoin" for him, which is wrong because Bitcoin Cash is the altcoin Bcash. Roger Ver will be the greatest salesman if he can convince everyone that Craig Wright is the real Satoshi Nakamoto. Hahahaha.

Bitcoin will always be the original coin, no matter what these Roger Ver fanboys wants to tell you. Bitcoin Cash is a fork from the original coin, it has never been a coin before. Why did they call it Bitcoin Cash?..Answer : It was a spawn of the original Bitcoin. Not that greedy MOFO wants to practice his snake oil salesmen tactics to tell people that it is the original Bitcoin. 

People should just work harder to expose this fraudster.   Where in the Bitcoin Whitepaper does it mention that Bitcoin is called Bitcoin Cash?

Good for you, and spoken like a brethren of Roger Ver, Craig Faketoshi Wright and Jihan Wu. Congratulations.

But answer the question. Is Bitcoin Clashic the real Bitcoin Cash?

Bitcoin Cash is a secured world-wide currency derived from Bitcoin's early vision to become "P2P Electronic Currency". Bitcoin Cash empowers merchants and users to transact at low cost and prompt confirmation. With new innovations and technological growth, Bitcoin Cash enables global adoption and decentralized monetary development.

Then why are my "Bitcoin Core" private keys able to claim all the coins Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin Gold, Bitcoin Private, etc.?

Plus what is Bitcoin Cashic? Is that the real Bitcoin Cash?

http://bitcoinclashic.org/