Would you trust in the ability of projects whose development team is based in china to make independent decisions?
If we consider tech companies, the Chinese GOVT has been especially pushing for installing government officials directly into them. To my knowledge, this isn't the case to many countries other than China.
We have very clear indications that this is actually happening actually:
https://www.ft.com/content/055a1864-ddd3-11e9-b112-9624ec9edc59
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/23/china-to-place-government-officials-in-100-companies-including-alibaba.html
I'm wondering, if this is happening to some of the strongest private companies operating in china, could cryptocurrency projects keep themselves out of it? I doubt that they could. In my view, any crypto project based in China is in danger to lose its ability to make decisions independently, and being more prone to censorship whether this happens in an obvious or non obvious way.
in america when setting up an exchange government want there to be an official there. 'compliance officers'
remember al the concerns about amazon alexa spying on peoples conversations and cia wanting apple to put a backdoor into its encrypted phones.
how about gun manufacturers being very buddy buddy bribing government with lobby grants
its funny that in america' its thought... 'its ok america are cute' but other countries are the devil
when you look at what gets manufactured and how america actually gets things made in china because its legally easier and cheaper than doing it in america just shows which country is more open
again in america mining pools have to apply to set up business in the area. many states have a 'not im my back yard' mentality and declined such applications
america have not yet actually approved an ETF
..
oh and this:
when a company starts it doesnt know whats right or wrong and so becomes exrta cautious to avoid costly legal risks.. then when they expand they realise they can have more freedom as they learn to understand the legal risks.
“In TikTok’s early days we took a blunt approach to minimising conflict on the platform, and our moderation guidelines allowed penalties to be given for things like content that promoted conflict, such as between religious sects or ethnic groups, spanning a number of regions around the world,” the company said. “As TikTok began to take off globally last year, we recognised that this was not the correct approach, and began working to empower local teams that have a nuanced understanding of each market. As we’ve grown we’ve implemented this localised approach across everything from product, to team, to policy development."
“The old guidelines in question are outdated and no longer in use. Today we take localised approaches, including local moderators, local content and moderation policies, local refinement of global policies, and more. We also consult with a number of independent local committees and are working to scale this at a global level, including forming an independent committee of leading industry organisations and experts to continually assess these policies."
so although your guardian link makes presumptions and opinions of doomsday. other sources of information such as tiktok themselves show it was their own initial policy they developed that was too heavy handed. and they realised they need to relax it a little