Pages:
Author

Topic: Illuminati End Game Started --- effects on BTC - page 2. (Read 16072 times)

newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
Do yourself a favor and research what film technology was available back then.

From there, start watching NASA footage, especially the film For All Mankind.

Conspiracy theorists seem to only reference a few images that they think have some sort of position on.  There is too much real footage to be a fake or a hoax.  Sure mankind went to space for political reasons, but who cares, it happened.

Do yourself a favour and research the moon landing conspiracy theory. If they really went to the moon then why fake anything at all?

I'm sure they all think man-made satellites and the ISS are fake too, don't worry. The level of conspiracy theories in this thread is absolutely insane.

While satellites are definitely possible due to the zero gravity ISS is a complete joke because they have air bubbles quickly moving upwards in several video footages which reveals that the whole scene is actually taking place under water.

And to those who keep using the word science, look up the Van Allen's radiation belt. The stupidity of the sheeple here is nothing new to my eyes. NASA engineer admits they can't get past the Van Allen Belts.

Keep digging.  

The radiation levels experienced by the astronauts via the Van Allen's belts was far less than what people on earth experience working in radiology, nuclear stations or getting certain CT scans.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
What the fuck guys. The landing was not a hoax.

The question regarding the Van Allen Belt radiation I also had once in an exam, the calculations showed that the radiation is minuscule in case of a fly-through. Smiley

Stop being retards.
<- space engineer

The thing is people take van allens comment about the danger of the van allen belt out of context when related to moon landing/ space flight hoax.
It was not possible to have a long lasting manned space mission in the van allen belt.
Devices and living organisms would not survive a duration of several month under the radiation.

*edit
@how to come back from the moon

There is a big difference in gravity on the moon in relation to earth, moon has nearly no atmosphere, in outer space is vacuum.
legendary
Activity: 1473
Merit: 1086
What the fuck guys. The landing was not a hoax.

The question regarding the Van Allen Belt radiation I also had once in an exam, the calculations showed that the radiation is minuscule in case of a fly-through. Smiley

Stop being retards.
<- space engineer
legendary
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1040
Well shit, if it's on YouTube it's irrefutable people.
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1015
Do yourself a favor and research what film technology was available back then.

From there, start watching NASA footage, especially the film For All Mankind.

Conspiracy theorists seem to only reference a few images that they think have some sort of position on.  There is too much real footage to be a fake or a hoax.  Sure mankind went to space for political reasons, but who cares, it happened.

Do yourself a favour and research the moon landing conspiracy theory. If they really went to the moon then why fake anything at all?

I'm sure they all think man-made satellites and the ISS are fake too, don't worry. The level of conspiracy theories in this thread is absolutely insane.

While satellites are definitely possible due to the zero gravity ISS is a complete joke because they have air bubbles quickly moving upwards in several video footages which reveals that the whole scene is actually taking place under water.

And to those who keep using the word science, look up the Van Allen's radiation belt. The stupidity of the sheeple here is nothing new to my eyes. NASA engineer admits they can't get past the Van Allen Belts.
legendary
Activity: 2101
Merit: 1061
I'm sure they all think man-made satellites and the ISS are fake too, don't worry. The level of conspiracy theories in this thread is absolutely insane.

It is interesting to wonder why we don't go to the moon anymore or have a base there though..
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1118
I'm sure they all think man-made satellites and the ISS are fake too, don't worry. The level of conspiracy theories in this thread is absolutely insane.
newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_loUDS4c3Cs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otvtMfEI_9w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdfSoWb6W54

The lunar landing was not faked, or a hoax.  Keep grasping at straws.

Also, do yourself a favor and watch For All Mankind, great film.

I just watched the first one but I can already say that it is quite lame. The guy is just stating "no it wasn't a hoax" as if it was any proof. About the technology, how the hell does he know what tech the government possessed back then? It's a long known truth that the tech we use today is "20 years old" for the military.

Sigh...
This thread contains many examples of why scientific literacy is so important.
I don't know that there's much hope for Hyena in terms of readjusting their thought processes.
Given that his/her posts are riddled with absolutes, they don't appear to realize that this undermines their credibility, regardless of the topic.
This displays a fundamental lack of knowledge regarding what our science has discovered about the nature of reality since the mid-1900's.
...

Instead of telling us something useful and educating you keep on sticking insulting labels on me without anything backing them up. You could as well as tell me to fuck off and that I suck which would be the TLDR version of your message. You are either butthurt or trolling, I don't know and I don't care.

One part of your text was interesting though. You encouraged people to question themselves Cheesy which is not a bad idea by the way. You should do it as well. However, equally important is to question everything external to yourself too. For example, one should always question the official story.


Do yourself a favor and research what film technology was available back then.

From there, start watching NASA footage, especially the film For All Mankind.

Conspiracy theorists seem to only reference a few images that they think have some sort of position on.  There is too much real footage to be a fake or a hoax.  Sure mankind went to space for political reasons, but who cares, it happened.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
Sczience is teh new dogma. Secularism is the new religion.
Illuminaty refers to light, the same way French Lumieres does, and in reference to lucifer, the light barer.
All this is in relation with the Freemasonry and Cabal symbology.

In the end, Sczience won over moral/spirituality.

Fun times ahead. Smiley


legendary
Activity: 2101
Merit: 1061
Sigh...
This thread contains many examples of why scientific literacy is so important.
I don't know that there's much hope for Hyena in terms of readjusting their thought processes.
Given that his/her posts are riddled with absolutes, they don't appear to realize that this undermines their credibility, regardless of the topic.
This displays a fundamental lack of knowledge regarding what our science has discovered about the nature of reality since the mid-1900's.
...

I'd say science is stuck in the dark ages today. I can't really believe that galaxy rotations are explained by dark matter which has gravity but no other existance and no-one knows what it is? Or dark energy? Or black holes? Scientists wank around with computer models which have zero connection to reality. But that doesn't seem to bother them. Or they pimp themselves to whoever is funding them. But just like preists in days of past they hold the truth. supposedly.
Also there is big reason to doubt that red shift is a function only of distance which casts doubt on the entire big bang hypothesis. Not that you'd know that by reading mainstream scientific literature. So in conclusion I'd be careful that you are not also falling into trap of believing absolutes which are not so.
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1015
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_loUDS4c3Cs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otvtMfEI_9w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdfSoWb6W54

The lunar landing was not faked, or a hoax.  Keep grasping at straws.

Also, do yourself a favor and watch For All Mankind, great film.

I just watched the first one but I can already say that it is quite lame. The guy is just stating "no it wasn't a hoax" as if it was any proof. About the technology, how the hell does he know what tech the government possessed back then? It's a long known truth that the tech we use today is "20 years old" for the military.

Sigh...
This thread contains many examples of why scientific literacy is so important.
I don't know that there's much hope for Hyena in terms of readjusting their thought processes.
Given that his/her posts are riddled with absolutes, they don't appear to realize that this undermines their credibility, regardless of the topic.
This displays a fundamental lack of knowledge regarding what our science has discovered about the nature of reality since the mid-1900's.
...

Instead of telling us something useful and educating you keep on sticking insulting labels on me without anything backing them up. You could as well as tell me to fuck off and that I suck which would be the TLDR version of your message. You are either butthurt or trolling, I don't know and I don't care.

One part of your text was interesting though. You encouraged people to question themselves Cheesy which is not a bad idea by the way. You should do it as well. However, equally important is to question everything external to yourself too. For example, one should always question the official story.
newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_loUDS4c3Cs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otvtMfEI_9w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdfSoWb6W54

The lunar landing was not faked, or a hoax.  Keep grasping at straws.

Also, do yourself a favor and watch For All Mankind, great film.
hero member
Activity: 611
Merit: 500
Anglo Saxon Crypto Enthusiast


Now while you think about this, ask yourself why there haven't been any more manned missions to the moon since 1972.

Because there's nothing there but rocks, and the journey costs a fortune, and people have to risk their lives to make it. There are discussions about a martian colony, but it's similar to the moon in that there's nothing there but rocks. Who's going to want to spend the rest of their lives living somewhere with nothing but piles of rocks everywhere?

I would say that rocket technology may be able to get you to the moon, but it isn't going to get you back again.  Look at all the energy required to leave Earth's orbit, and all the fuel tanks that break off in the process. Now look at those pathetic little thrusters on the lander. Do you think it would be able to lift off the moon? I would say not.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
A population bubble  Cheesy

A correction  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

You're aware that not everything is a market?


not markets.. cycles.

legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
A population bubble  Cheesy

A correction  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

You're aware that not everything is a market?


not markets.. cycles.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
One of the signature trolling strategies: "Ignore the evidence by making a joke of it"

Only logic will satisfy, thanks
sr. member
Activity: 327
Merit: 250


Now while you think about this, ask yourself why there haven't been any more manned missions to the moon since 1972.

Because there's nothing there but rocks

How is a giant star made entirely out of Gouda cheese "rocks," exactly?  Just how naive do you think we are?

You are incredibly naive if you seriously think the moon is a giant star made entirely out of Gouda cheese. It's been scientifically proven to be a big chunk of rock covered in boring little piles of smaller rocks. There's nothing to see there because the lizard men live deep underground and never venture onto the surface. There's absolutely no reason for earthlings to visit the moon again.

sr. member
Activity: 471
Merit: 250
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
Let me guess, you also think the moonlanding is a hoax?

The moonlanding may or may not have been a hoax. What is a hoax is the videos and photo footage they showed to the public about the moonlanding.




I agree, this pic offers what I think is the best evidence.. The sky is blacked out, and the image of the Earth looks like a double exposure. The Earth should be larger, not the same size as the Moon when we look at it from Earth.

au contraire

nothing is blacked out. the earth is so much brighter than stars in the background, so you don't see them in this exposure.
Also, earth is much, much bigger on this picture than Moon ever is, apart from the time it's size is exaggerated by being close to horizon, but it is the effect of the atmosphere; there is no atmosphere on the Mooon, hence no "magnifying" effect when close to horizon.





That undisturbed lunar surface beneath the Lunar Module's Rockets tho!

The Lem looks awfully clean for all that rocket thrust that should have been firing lunar dust all over the place.  Looks like it was placed there.  Also that side of the Lem that's facing away from the sun looks pretty bright for a subject on the opposite side of the only light source, on a surface where there is no atmosphere...why do hollywood film productions need expensive lighting arrangements again?


Pages:
Jump to: