crazy has too much time on his hands. why does he care about a necro bump
I do. I really really do. 
Topic: i'm cool (Read 2740 times)
crazy has too much time on his hands. why does he care about a necro bump
Because I asked
Necro-necro bump. Let me show you how an old man does it.
crazy has too much time on his hands. why does he care about a necro bump
The purpose was my Mhash was 1337. Also NECRO BUMP.
Doh! Didn't even notice that. 
What the heck does "NECRO BUMP" mean?Got to be patient with us old farts.
Sam
Doh! Again. I didn't even notice the date on the OP.
Thanks,
Sam
The purpose was my Mhash was 1337. Also NECRO BUMP.
Doh! Didn't even notice that. What the heck does "NECRO BUMP" mean?Got to be patient with us old farts.
Sam
Thanks, I do my best.
It is consistently 1337 too.
It is consistently 1337 too.
psilan,
What is your purpose of this thread?
I was thinking that since everyone is mining with their GPU's for one last Hurrah before the AISC's kick in big time, maybe we should post pic's of our GPU miners with some power and block solve stats so that we have some documentary evidence for Bitcoin posterity.
Sam
The purpose was my Mhash was 1337. Also NECRO BUMP.
Doh! Didn't even notice that.
What the heck does "NECRO BUMP" mean?Got to be patient with us old farts.
Sam
Thanks, I do my best.
It is consistently 1337 too.
It is consistently 1337 too.
psilan,
What is your purpose of this thread?
I was thinking that since everyone is mining with their GPU's for one last Hurrah before the AISC's kick in big time, maybe we should post pic's of our GPU miners with some power and block solve stats so that we have some documentary evidence for Bitcoin posterity.
Sam
The purpose was my Mhash was 1337. Also NECRO BUMP.
its cool so cool.
(5s):900.73 (avg): 900.78 Mh/s | H: 94.5 Q:39756 A:71220 R:150 HW:0 E:?% U:12.49/m
TQ:? ST:37 SS:? DW:22217 NB:676 LW:100069 GF:8 RF:7
Value:
GPU 0: 45.5C 1238RPM 50% 96 | 300.1/300.1Mh/s | 99% | 940Mhz 300Mhz 1.15V A:23713 R:56 HW:0 U:4.16/m I: 9
GPU 1: 43.5C 2060RPM 50% 94 | 300.7/300.7Mh/s | 99% | 940Mhz 300Mhz 1.15V A:23515 R:44 HW:0 U:4.12/m I: 9
GPU 2: 44.5C 3711RPM 50% 95 | 300.0/300.0Mh/s | 99% | 940Mhz 300Mhz 1.15V A:23992 R:50 HW:0 U:4.21/m I: 9
yes, yes it can...3rd card is on air...accelero triple fan...it's a 5870
Yep, that is cool. With fans even.
Thread of random GPU's mining with temps? OK, I'll play this silly game
Doesn't get cooler than that, does it?
That was fun.
Sam
Edit: Blocks solved with this miner since about April/May 2011: None (that I know of).
Doesn't get cooler than that, does it?
That was fun.
Sam
Edit: Blocks solved with this miner since about April/May 2011: None (that I know of).
yes, yes it can...3rd card is on air...accelero triple fan...it's a 5870 and that's as high as i can get it to oc...darn vddc won't step up any higher on bamt
Thanks, I do my best.
It is consistently 1337 too.
It is consistently 1337 too.
psilan,
What is your purpose of this thread?
I was thinking that since everyone is mining with their GPU's for one last Hurrah before the AISC's kick in big time, maybe we should post pic's of our GPU miners with some power and block solve stats so that we have some documentary evidence for Bitcoin posterity.
Sam
Thread of random GPU's mining with temps? OK, I'll play this silly game
Doesn't get cooler than that, does it?
That was fun.
Sam
Edit: Blocks solved with this miner since about April/May 2011: None (that I know of).
Doesn't get cooler than that, does it?
That was fun.
Sam
Edit: Blocks solved with this miner since about April/May 2011: None (that I know of).
Nice outputs!
Sweet, thanks for the reply!
What cooler do you have on your 6950? I have the reference cooler and have to run the fan speed at 60% to get mid 80's temps.
i have non-ref cooler. allways under 50%
this one:
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/radeon-hd-6950-1gb-benchmark,review-32300-5.html
What cooler do you have on your 6950? I have the reference cooler and have to run the fan speed at 60% to get mid 80's temps.
my hd6950`s with nice hash and temps
Thanks, I do my best.
It is consistently 1337 too.
It is consistently 1337 too.
nice post 
sure, why not.
I approve this message.
Jump to: