Author

Topic: I'm in the Guardian again - on the right of sex workers to refuse a client. (Read 1155 times)

full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
Retired from the mistressing business
And yes that is indeed my article Smiley
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
Retired from the mistressing business
Hilarious can speak for me whenever he wants. Quality defence there.   I use the term sex worker for everyone from camgirls to escorts.   I do not do sexual contact,  but I use the word sex worker because it is a term designed to build solidarity among the different types of sex worker based on what we have in common.  I am a libertarian socialist and I am a strong advocate of bitcoin.

Very happy to answer queries but I am on holiday so it is a bit slow.   Also I am UK based.
global moderator
Activity: 3934
Merit: 2676
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Maybe you should let the prostitute speak for herself. Who knows, she might find it offensive that you presume to speak for her.

I'm not speaking for her opinion on this, but this goes back to my thoughts that you can't process information very well as I haven't once stated what she does find offensive, but what her and others may or might do and gave you several examples and reasons for this, but I think it's become clear you just want to be derogatory for the sake, especially by referring to her as "the prostitute". I guess you probably just have a misogynistic or condescending attitude to women and sex workers and want to say the most offensive thing about them as possible to demean 'em because you look down upon them. It's probably just another form of slut-shaming really.



full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 101
damn, if a prostitute turned you down, I really..

damn, I have nothing to say

poor guy, he's probably going to jump off a bridge or something, this isn't good for anything Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
Maybe you should let the prostitute speak for herself. Who knows, she might find it offensive that you presume to speak for her.
global moderator
Activity: 3934
Merit: 2676
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
It's what the profession is called. It's not offensive. It's descriptive. Prostitution is what prostitutes do. Including those who don't put dick in vagina, yes.

Prostitutes charge for penetrative sex. I'm no expert but Doms provide other services other than penetrative sex. Some will do both, but I don't think Magpie does, so therefore she might find it offensive or derogatory or maybe she's not bothered, but that still doesn't make it ok to say it to someone who does find it offensive. I can't comment on whether it's offensive or not as I'm not a sex worker or in the industry, but hopefully Magpie would clarify later as I'd like to hear her thoughts on the matter.

Again though, how can you tell me what somebody else does or doesn't find offensive? There are lots of terms or words that started out as being fine to use, but are no longer because they became used as insults. Calling someone a midget is descriptive, but it's also offensive.

And I'm not really interested in your opinion, for the record. As noted, there are people who get offended over anything. I'm curious why prostitutes would be upset over being called what they are.

So you are or aren't curious why, because I've just explained to you in several ways why some sex workers might find it offensive. Not all sex workers are prostitutes. Most Dominatrixes aren't prostitutes; there's a difference. Why do Indians not like being called Pakis? Because they're different and not the same and that's an offensive term whether you might think it is or isn't. If you really need more examples or explanations or are still confused then you really aren't able to process information very well.



legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
Is there some kind of problem with calling prostitutes prostitutes?

I think 'sex worker' is the less offensive politcally correct term. I mean, you could refer to people of African descent as 'darkies' or 'coloureds' if you wanted, but it's frowned upon. Also, if you were referring to Magpie herself, as far as I'm aware, she's not a prostitute but a dominatrix.
I'm not american so screw your superstition. I should maybe have been more specific. What I meant was, is there any reasonable problem with calling prostitutes prostitutes? Reasonable as in, other than offending people who get offended over things that are not offensive.

I never said you were American, so I'm confused by what you mean by that and 'superstition', but I don't think you get to decide what is and isn't offensive to someone or not. I would imagine some sex workers will find the term 'prostitute' offensive, especially when they're not one. I think it's a similar situation with the words 'midget' and 'spastic' etc. Both valid words but were gradually used as slurs and became offensive. You might not think they're offensive, but the the majority of the people they affect and refer to do.
Anyone can be offended by anything. That's no argument.

Of course it is. That's no excuse. Do you honestly expect a respectable paper like The Guardian to refer to sex workers as whores or street meat? You can use those words with your friends if you want, but there are certain words that are largely considered offensive because they're slurs or derogatory, which is what you are being. Racists say the same thing when they get told off for saying nigger or coloureds or darkies etc. If you called a dwarf a midget you will offend the majority of dwarves because it's an offensive pejorative term and you don't get to decide what someone finds offensive or not. You're free to use offensive terms if you want and it doesn't actually bother me when people do as I'd just think you were an ignorant fool if you did and wouldn't really respect that persons opinion or judgement if they continued to use them after they'd been told why they were offensive to a particular person or group, but you can't use the excuse 'everything is offensive to someone' to use words that people clearly find offensive. And I personally don't have a problem with the word prostitute, but If I said it about a sex worker who found it offensive I wouldn't say it to her again. Magpie and other Dominatrixes might find being called prostitutes offensive when they're not one. Some might not be bothered, some might be, but I'd take that on a case by case basis.

What does bitcoin have to do with sex workers? Unless they are paying their services in bitcoins. That would be something new.  Grin

Well Magpie is a Libertarian and an advocate of Bitcoin and is trying to get Bitcoin involved in her particular line of work. Bitcoin could really thrive in the sex/porn industries.
It's what the profession is called. It's not offensive. It's descriptive. Prostitution is what prostitutes do. Including those who don't put dick in vagina, yes.

And I'm not really interested in your opinion, for the record. As noted, there are people who get offended over anything. I'm curious why prostitutes would be upset over being called what they are.
global moderator
Activity: 3934
Merit: 2676
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Is there some kind of problem with calling prostitutes prostitutes?

I think 'sex worker' is the less offensive politcally correct term. I mean, you could refer to people of African descent as 'darkies' or 'coloureds' if you wanted, but it's frowned upon. Also, if you were referring to Magpie herself, as far as I'm aware, she's not a prostitute but a dominatrix.
I'm not american so screw your superstition. I should maybe have been more specific. What I meant was, is there any reasonable problem with calling prostitutes prostitutes? Reasonable as in, other than offending people who get offended over things that are not offensive.

I never said you were American, so I'm confused by what you mean by that and 'superstition', but I don't think you get to decide what is and isn't offensive to someone or not. I would imagine some sex workers will find the term 'prostitute' offensive, especially when they're not one. I think it's a similar situation with the words 'midget' and 'spastic' etc. Both valid words but were gradually used as slurs and became offensive. You might not think they're offensive, but the the majority of the people they affect and refer to do.
Anyone can be offended by anything. That's no argument.

Of course it is. That's no excuse. Do you honestly expect a respectable paper like The Guardian to refer to sex workers as whores or street meat? You can use those words with your friends if you want, but there are certain words that are largely considered offensive because they're slurs or derogatory, which is what you are being. Racists say the same thing when they get told off for saying nigger or coloureds or darkies etc. If you called a dwarf a midget you will offend the majority of dwarves because it's an offensive pejorative term and you don't get to decide what someone finds offensive or not. You're free to use offensive terms if you want and it doesn't actually bother me when people do as I'd just think you were an ignorant fool if you did and wouldn't really respect that persons opinion or judgement if they continued to use them after they'd been told why they were offensive to a particular person or group, but you can't use the excuse 'everything is offensive to someone' to use words that people clearly find offensive. And I personally don't have a problem with the word prostitute, but If I said it about a sex worker who found it offensive I wouldn't say it to her again. Magpie and other Dominatrixes might find being called prostitutes offensive when they're not one. Some might not be bothered, some might be, but I'd take that on a case by case basis.

What does bitcoin have to do with sex workers? Unless they are paying their services in bitcoins. That would be something new.  Grin

Well Magpie is a Libertarian and an advocate of Bitcoin and is trying to get Bitcoin involved in her particular line of work. Bitcoin could really thrive in the sex/porn industries.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
What does bitcoin have to do with sex workers? Unless they are paying their services in bitcoins. That would be something new.  Grin
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
Is there some kind of problem with calling prostitutes prostitutes?

I think 'sex worker' is the less offensive politcally correct term. I mean, you could refer to people of African descent as 'darkies' or 'coloureds' if you wanted, but it's frowned upon. Also, if you were referring to Magpie herself, as far as I'm aware, she's not a prostitute but a dominatrix.
I'm not american so screw your superstition. I should maybe have been more specific. What I meant was, is there any reasonable problem with calling prostitutes prostitutes? Reasonable as in, other than offending people who get offended over things that are not offensive.

I never said you were American, so I'm confused by what you mean by that and 'superstition', but I don't think you get to decide what is and isn't offensive to someone or not. I would imagine some sex workers will find the term 'prostitute' offensive, especially when they're not one. I think it's a similar situation with the words 'midget' and 'spastic' etc. Both valid words but were gradually used as slurs and became offensive. You might not think they're offensive, but the the majority of the people they affect and refer to do.
Anyone can be offended by anything. That's no argument. Point here is, the difference between street meat in Bangkok and whores in Harlem is what language they speak. Other than money. Trying to make it sound more respectable than it is - well, to use your language, I find that offensive.
global moderator
Activity: 3934
Merit: 2676
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Is there some kind of problem with calling prostitutes prostitutes?

I think 'sex worker' is the less offensive politcally correct term. I mean, you could refer to people of African descent as 'darkies' or 'coloureds' if you wanted, but it's frowned upon. Also, if you were referring to Magpie herself, as far as I'm aware, she's not a prostitute but a dominatrix.
I'm not american so screw your superstition. I should maybe have been more specific. What I meant was, is there any reasonable problem with calling prostitutes prostitutes? Reasonable as in, other than offending people who get offended over things that are not offensive.

I never said you were American, so I'm confused by what you mean by that and 'superstition', but I don't think you get to decide what is and isn't offensive to someone or not. I would imagine some sex workers will find the term 'prostitute' offensive, especially when they're not one. I think it's a similar situation with the words 'midget' and 'spastic' etc. Both valid words but were gradually used as slurs and became offensive. You might not think they're offensive, but the the majority of the people they affect and refer to do.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
Is there some kind of problem with calling prostitutes prostitutes?

I think 'sex worker' is the less offensive politcally correct term. I mean, you could refer to people of African descent as 'darkies' or 'coloureds' if you wanted, but it's frowned upon. Also, if you were referring to Magpie herself, as far as I'm aware, she's not a prostitute but a dominatrix.
I'm not american so screw your superstition. I should maybe have been more specific. What I meant was, is there any reasonable problem with calling prostitutes prostitutes? Reasonable as in, other than offending people who get offended over things that are not offensive.
global moderator
Activity: 3934
Merit: 2676
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Is there some kind of problem with calling prostitutes prostitutes?

I think 'sex worker' is the less offensive politcally correct term. I mean, you could refer to people of African descent as 'darkies' or 'coloureds' if you wanted, but it's frowned upon. Also, if you were referring to Magpie herself, as far as I'm aware, she's not a prostitute but a dominatrix.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
Is there some kind of problem with calling prostitutes prostitutes?
global moderator
Activity: 3934
Merit: 2676
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
But most of the time if you increase the money they will accept.  Smiley

I guess it's not about the money but standards and safety. An extra £50 for some fat sweaty psychopath who's going to stab you at the end of it probably isn't worth it  Cheesy.
sr. member
Activity: 756
Merit: 251
World's First Crowd Owned Cryptocurrency Exchange
But most of the time if you increase the money they will accept.  Smiley
global moderator
Activity: 3934
Merit: 2676
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Quote
This week, newspapers reported a complaint made to Harrow borough council's Trading Standards office by a man who had been refused service by an escort. I am angered but unsurprised by his complaint; it seems to come from a familiar perception that sex workers are mere automatons, not skilled professionals.

Ha, not heard about that, but could there be anything more embarrassing for a man than to be turned down by a sex-worker? Of course, I respect sex-workers' rights to refuse service though, and it must be difficult for you to actually have to refuse people too.

Sometimes I need to refuse someone because they just stink and have no sense of hygiene.

Yeah, I know, but essentialy being told you stink to the point of repulsion no matter how politely you put it is a pretty heavy blow.

"Rights" of criminals and illegal activities.  Funny  Roll Eyes

Being a sexworker or a prostitute isn't illegal in a lot of places, and just like drugs, where it is, it shouldn't be.
legendary
Activity: 4494
Merit: 3178
Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023
could not open your link Sad  sounds you are turned down by sex-worker? what did you ask for Grin
*dope slap* Mistress Magpie is the sex worker. Pay attention.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
could not open your link Sad  sounds you are turned down by sex-worker? what did you ask for Grin
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1011
Reverse engineer from time to time
Quote
This week, newspapers reported a complaint made to Harrow borough council's Trading Standards office by a man who had been refused service by an escort. I am angered but unsurprised by his complaint; it seems to come from a familiar perception that sex workers are mere automatons, not skilled professionals.

Ha, not heard about that, but could there be anything more embarrassing for a man than to be turned down by a sex-worker? Of course, I respect sex-workers' rights to refuse service though, and it must be difficult for you to actually have to refuse people too.

Sometimes I need to refuse someone because they just stink and have no sense of hygiene.  I'm actually pretty good at being delicate about this, and people have literally cleaned up their act, and come back.  With people that seem sociopathic, nuts or dangerous I just get them away from me as quickly as possible.
Just to clarify since my brain does not compute. Your occupation is what? And you are also the author to that article in the link you posted?
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
"Rights" of criminals and illegal activities.  Funny  Roll Eyes
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
Retired from the mistressing business
Quote
This week, newspapers reported a complaint made to Harrow borough council's Trading Standards office by a man who had been refused service by an escort. I am angered but unsurprised by his complaint; it seems to come from a familiar perception that sex workers are mere automatons, not skilled professionals.

Ha, not heard about that, but could there be anything more embarrassing for a man than to be turned down by a sex-worker? Of course, I respect sex-workers' rights to refuse service though, and it must be difficult for you to actually have to refuse people too.

Sometimes I need to refuse someone because they just stink and have no sense of hygiene.  I'm actually pretty good at being delicate about this, and people have literally cleaned up their act, and come back.  With people that seem sociopathic, nuts or dangerous I just get them away from me as quickly as possible.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 101
I actually managed to miss an opportunity to talk about bitcoin in this piece - I could have added how bitcoin deposits help build trust and weed out timewasters.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/25/sex-workers-right-to-refuse

yeah, bitcoin definitely weeds something out Cheesy
global moderator
Activity: 3934
Merit: 2676
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Quote
This week, newspapers reported a complaint made to Harrow borough council's Trading Standards office by a man who had been refused service by an escort. I am angered but unsurprised by his complaint; it seems to come from a familiar perception that sex workers are mere automatons, not skilled professionals.

Ha, not heard about that, but could there be anything more embarrassing for a man than to be turned down by a sex-worker? Of course, I respect sex-workers' rights to refuse service though, and it must be difficult for you to actually have to refuse people too.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
Retired from the mistressing business
I actually managed to miss an opportunity to talk about bitcoin in this piece - I could have added how bitcoin deposits help build trust and weed out timewasters.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/25/sex-workers-right-to-refuse
Jump to: