Author

Topic: IMET’s response to AMT (Advanced Mining Technology Inc) negative allegations (Read 3978 times)

hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
The money is there. Already traced the wallets used to bilk us. He also spent a sizable amount of money on silk road as well. But he has been putting all that money into KNC farms and such. I have posted about the wallets in use. He is keeping them in bitcoin in the hopes that the court will not ask for the money and he could fool them based on sales figures.....Judge said in no uncertain terms that sales figures dont matter here. Getting the money to the customers is. So with the class on, this is where IMET fits in. If AMT tried to sue them, what happened? There was alot of that, but who knows. "Joshua Zipkin" has proven he is terrible at follow through. By his own admission he is an "ideas" guy. So action is not high on his list of things.

With the class action against AMT being official, just curious if AMT ever actually went ahead to sue IMET or it was otherwise settled? Any info here?

They probably filed an initial complaint then ran out of money to continue.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
With the class action against AMT being official, just curious if AMT ever actually went ahead to sue IMET or it was otherwise settled? Any info here?

They probably filed an initial complaint then ran out of money to continue.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
With the class action against AMT being official, just curious if AMT ever actually went ahead to sue IMET or it was otherwise settled? Any info here?
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Quote from: AMT_miners on October 01, 2013, 09:26:32 AM
Quote
We're keeping it on the level, because we're on the square brother.[/size]

"We're keeping it on the level, Honest Abe".

Doesn't that sound soooooooooo much better??

Heard that somewheres before havent we?

LOL.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
I am posting this here since it was deleted by AMT on the New Official AMT Thread and was in response to continued public deformation of IMET.

Cease and desist on these acts of public deformation of IMET.  The truth will come out in the proper forum based on your lawsuit post.

Your previous remarks, posts and comments regarding AMT, our dealings, and just about everything you discussed was a direct breach of contract based on the NDA you signed at the start of our dealings.

Threatening the "mysterious answer" of how to fix the boards for an additional payment you felt was due for a 90% failed production run, was a sleazy thing to do.

Your production is what caused our boards to fail, plain and simple.  We have the original boards and all of them suffer from one specific flaw which after more than one PCB diagnostician analyzed them each came to same conclusion - which is IMET failed to do something vital during their production process. The lack of which caused almost all the modules to fail immediately or shortly there after. Those which lasted through testing did not survive more than a few weeks to a month.

IMET If you care so much about your reputation you'll refund us so that we can refund our clients. Or we'll continue and sue you for a lot more than the refunded amount. You'll also spend about that much during these proceedings especially if we join you in the class action. Think about it.

ON A PUBLIC FORUM  

AS SOON AS IMET ISSUES US A REFUND FOR THE HUNDREDS OF MODULES WE HAVE THAT DO NOT WORK WE WILL REFUND ALL CLIENTS WISHING TO RECEIVE REFUNDS.

WE HAVE PAID IMET OVER 200,000 DOLLARS - THAT'S A LOT OF REFUNDS.  





How is this AMT mining still on the forum ? why hasnt this person and all associated accounts been removed and login logs sent to fouled customers ? Why isnt anyone actually attempting to bring forth a lawsuit if people have lost money. at least picket his house. just stop being so passive aggressive it's disgusting.
vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
Quote from: AMT_miners on October 01, 2013, 09:26:32 AM
Quote
We're keeping it on the level, because we're on the square brother.[/size]

"We're keeping it on the level, Honest Abe".

Doesn't that sound soooooooooo much better??

A couple months later, Joshua Zipkin goes on record wondering where all the Freemason shit came from, claiming he wasn't one. Now, he has an office in the back of a Masonic Temple, not realizing said Temple was there because he didn't have time to walk around to the front of the building. And this ASSHOLE is on the square?


Harry Zipkin, Joshua Zipkin's 320 lb Daddy-O, is on the far left.
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
IMET's name came up again, so I stated the fact that the printed circuit boards IMET was responsible for work just fine and the claims that AMT keeps making are simply untrue.  The problem with the overall system is thermal and mechanicals that IMET was NOT responsible for.  AMT deleted this post very quickly.  AMT, cease and desist on this public deformation.   I am only posting here because of the deletion.




You have just been sent a personal message by Bitcoin Forum on Bitcoin Forum.

IMPORTANT: Remember, this is just a notification. Please do not reply to this email.

The message they sent you was:

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Quote
Quote from: AMT_miners on August 06, 2014, 01:08:44 PM
(https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs28.postimg.org%2Fmjvys3595%2FSAM_0297.jpg&t=542&c=IeE3pw7mM335Mg) (FORUM: disabled on this page for security.) (http://postimg.org/image/mjvys3595/)

Here's another picture of shipments and boxes.  They were shipped out. They were delayed in hong kong. Some clients have already received them. NOT ALL OF OUR CLIENTS CONSIST OF THE 20 PEOPLE THAT READ THIS THREAD.

Again, we are working hard to get everyone their machines and eventually going to try and upgrade people. Some nicer clients have recieved cloud hashing compensation while they wait for their machines. We're doing what we can and we are doing it on a dime because of IMETs fuck up and because of Lenell bullshit and because of our poor decision making skills. STOP writing shit, stop complaining, work with us to get what you want or keep up the crap

Why dont you guys buy some more hardware, we're selling again to try and bring in revenue to help fulfill MPP right.  Or keep complaining and trashing our rep, either way its beyond us at this point.

Thanks

AMT. 



Once again, IMET was responsible for PCB Assembly only.  There is nothing wrong with the PCBs.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
newsflash...

Josua Zipkin is a liar.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1756
Verified Bernie Bro - Feel The Bern!
Quote from: AMT_miners on October 01, 2013, 09:26:32 AM
Quote
We're keeping it on the level, because we're on the square brother.[/size]

"We're keeping it on the level, Honest Abe".

Doesn't that sound soooooooooo much better??
vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
IMET, did you manufacture this board?

The one with the burn marks?

We did make that and it was not damaged when delivered to AMT.  One of two things caused that failure.  Either the backplane was shorted out (likely to the hash board heatsinks) or the backplane was not connected to the hash boards correctly (off by a pin or upside down).


Or the lack of copper in the board itself cause the trails to overheat. IMET chose to cut costs, we paid the price.

Didn't IMET create the boards based on your given specs? Are you stating that they have breached their contract?

Yes but incorporated their own alternations, component replacements and failed to order to correct amount of copper. and we're suing them for that among a few other things. And when they refund our money, we'll refund our clients.

joshua zipkin has done nothing but lie since day 1. he took $6,000 dollars from me last year and never delivered a product. he lied repeatedly about delivery dates and he lied repeatedly about my supposed refund he told me was "in the mail".

JOSHUA ZIPKIN, OF AMT MINERS IS A CON ARTIST. HE HAS ESSENTIALLY STOLE MONEY FROM ME.

i dont believe a word AMT miners says in regards to IMET. IMET has stated Joshua Zipkin wrote a a bad check! this is the same behavior joshua zipkin has exhibited from day 1... lying, deceitful, full of shit arrogant prick.

Looks like Joshua Zipkin has been busy deleting his posts as well: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3281514

Quote from: AMT_miners on October 01, 2013, 09:26:32 AM
Quote
Ok there are few spelling mistakes, get over it. And there is a third floor to that office, walk in the office, go up the green stairs, next to the bar is a door, go through the door and up to the third floor. Yes it is a small space,  and no where not spending a lot of money on the location because this is primarily an online business anyway and we've put a lot of our own money into bring you miners. Ask for Harry who is in the office AT THE MOMENT, if you must. Bring your money and buy a miner for bs your putting us through. We're most likely not going to make any money off the first line and we're just trying to bring a miner to market to demonstrate trust and we're met with all this crap.

In this industry you have the choice of buying a miner and waiting 6 months until you don't meet roi, or buying a miner and never getting it. We're trying to bring a difference to the market by being open, and legit about everything, and not running our damn miners in the mean time while our customers wait and email us their concerns while we dont respond.  And you know why they do that, cause they make more money in time you wait for your purchased miner and can afford to give you a refund when your so pissed. We're trying to do things differently and bring miners to market quickly.

When i'm back in the office in a few weeks, please come see me personally and we'll make a nice video together, i promise.

We're keeping it on the level, because we're on the square brother.

Remember when Brother Josh denied being a Freemasons? BTW, the Harry mentioned above is Joshua Zipkin's Daddy-O, the venerable Harrison Zachariah Zipkin, who just so happens to attend the Masonic Temple that AMT currently has its third office (vacating the other two due to customer concerns) in the back sans an exterior doorknob, but Josh didn't know there was a Masonic Temple attached to the front of his office because he didn't have time to walk around the building and take a peek. This would be so motherfuckin' funny if it wasn't the Goddamn truth.
full member
Activity: 121
Merit: 100
Yes but incorporated their own alternations, component replacements and failed to order to correct amount of copper. and we're suing them for that among a few other things. And when they refund our money, we'll refund our clients.

Why you always talk about they refund your money and you refund your clients?
You have take responsibility with things you done. Don't kick it to them
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Sounds like it's simple enough to figure this one out.  Look at the board design that YOU APPROVED.  If it's different than what was printed, then IMET may have some liability.  If it is exactly as you signed off, then you need to eat this one. 

IMET, did you manufacture this board?

The one with the burn marks?


We did make that and it was not damaged when delivered to AMT.  One of two things caused that failure.  Either the backplane was shorted out (likely to the hash board heatsinks) or the backplane was not connected to the hash boards correctly (off by a pin or upside down).


Or the lack of copper in the board itself cause the trails to overheat. IMET chose to cut costs, we paid the price.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
IMET, did you manufacture this board?

The one with the burn marks?

We did make that and it was not damaged when delivered to AMT.  One of two things caused that failure.  Either the backplane was shorted out (likely to the hash board heatsinks) or the backplane was not connected to the hash boards correctly (off by a pin or upside down).


Or the lack of copper in the board itself cause the trails to overheat. IMET chose to cut costs, we paid the price.

Didn't IMET create the boards based on your given specs? Are you stating that they have breached their contract?

Yes but incorporated their own alternations, component replacements and failed to order to correct amount of copper. and we're suing them for that among a few other things. And when they refund our money, we'll refund our clients.

joshua zipkin has done nothing but lie since day 1. he took $6,000 dollars from me last year and never delivered a product. he lied repeatedly about delivery dates and he lied repeatedly about my supposed refund he told me was "in the mail".

JOSHUA ZIPKIN, OF AMT MINERS IS A CON ARTIST. HE HAS ESSENTIALLY STOLE MONEY FROM ME.

i dont believe a word AMT miners says in regards to IMET. IMET has stated Joshua Zipkin wrote a a bad check! this is the same behavior joshua zipkin has exhibited from day 1... lying, deceitful, full of shit arrogant prick.

:/ Why aren't you suing them then?

I am.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
IMET, did you manufacture this board?

The one with the burn marks?

We did make that and it was not damaged when delivered to AMT.  One of two things caused that failure.  Either the backplane was shorted out (likely to the hash board heatsinks) or the backplane was not connected to the hash boards correctly (off by a pin or upside down).


Or the lack of copper in the board itself cause the trails to overheat. IMET chose to cut costs, we paid the price.

Didn't IMET create the boards based on your given specs? Are you stating that they have breached their contract?

Yes but incorporated their own alternations, component replacements and failed to order to correct amount of copper. and we're suing them for that among a few other things. And when they refund our money, we'll refund our clients.

joshua zipkin has done nothing but lie since day 1. he took $6,000 dollars from me last year and never delivered a product. he lied repeatedly about delivery dates and he lied repeatedly about my supposed refund he told me was "in the mail".

JOSHUA ZIPKIN, OF AMT MINERS IS A CON ARTIST. HE HAS ESSENTIALLY STOLE MONEY FROM ME.

i dont believe a word AMT miners says in regards to IMET. IMET has stated Joshua Zipkin wrote a a bad check! this is the same behavior joshua zipkin has exhibited from day 1... lying, deceitful, full of shit arrogant prick.

:/ Why aren't you suing them then?
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
IMET, did you manufacture this board?

The one with the burn marks?

We did make that and it was not damaged when delivered to AMT.  One of two things caused that failure.  Either the backplane was shorted out (likely to the hash board heatsinks) or the backplane was not connected to the hash boards correctly (off by a pin or upside down).


Or the lack of copper in the board itself cause the trails to overheat. IMET chose to cut costs, we paid the price.

Didn't IMET create the boards based on your given specs? Are you stating that they have breached their contract?

Yes but incorporated their own alternations, component replacements and failed to order to correct amount of copper. and we're suing them for that among a few other things. And when they refund our money, we'll refund our clients.

joshua zipkin has done nothing but lie since day 1. he took $6,000 dollars from me last year and never delivered a product. he lied repeatedly about delivery dates and he lied repeatedly about my supposed refund he told me was "in the mail".

JOSHUA ZIPKIN, OF AMT MINERS IS A CON ARTIST. HE HAS ESSENTIALLY STOLE MONEY FROM ME.

i dont believe a word AMT miners says in regards to IMET. IMET has stated Joshua Zipkin wrote a a bad check! this is the same behavior joshua zipkin has exhibited from day 1... lying, deceitful, full of shit arrogant prick.
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
IMET, did you manufacture this board?

The one with the burn marks?

We did make that and it was not damaged when delivered to AMT.  One of two things caused that failure.  Either the backplane was shorted out (likely to the hash board heatsinks) or the backplane was not connected to the hash boards correctly (off by a pin or upside down).


Or the lack of copper in the board itself cause the trails to overheat. IMET chose to cut costs, we paid the price.

Didn't IMET create the boards based on your given specs? Are you stating that they have breached their contract?

Yes but incorporated their own alternations, component replacements and failed to order to correct amount of copper. and we're suing them for that among a few other things. And when they refund our money, we'll refund our clients.
Once again, this is simply not true and all documentation is in place to support our case.
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
IMET, did you manufacture this board?

The one with the burn marks?

https://i.imgur.com/wKyCMsU.jpg
We did make that and it was not damaged when delivered to AMT.  One of two things caused that failure.  Either the backplane was shorted out (likely to the hash board heatsinks) or the backplane was not connected to the hash boards correctly (off by a pin or upside down).


Or the lack of copper in the board itself cause the trails to overheat. IMET chose to cut costs, we paid the price.

This is simply not true.  There was no cost cutting.  Boards were built to print and work just fine.  The backplane is low current.  The failure to the backplane is caused by the problems I suggested above.
vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
IMET, did you manufacture this board?

The one with the burn marks?

We did make that and it was not damaged when delivered to AMT.  One of two things caused that failure.  Either the backplane was shorted out (likely to the hash board heatsinks) or the backplane was not connected to the hash boards correctly (off by a pin or upside down).


Or the lack of copper in the board itself cause the trails to overheat. IMET chose to cut costs, we paid the price.

Didn't IMET create the boards based on your given specs? Are you stating that they have breached their contract?

Yes but incorporated their own alternations, component replacements and failed to order to correct amount of copper. and we're suing them for that among a few other things. And when they refund our money, we'll refund our clients.

Is shipping included when you're ready to ship out refunds?

Quote
Shipping is not included, but if you have a UPS, FEDEX, or DHL account we can ship and bill to your account. Or preferably you create a label and we'll just bring it out throw it on the package and ship.

Not that AMT has never, ever had shipping issues, I'm just asking.  Roll Eyes
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
IMET, did you manufacture this board?

The one with the burn marks?

We did make that and it was not damaged when delivered to AMT.  One of two things caused that failure.  Either the backplane was shorted out (likely to the hash board heatsinks) or the backplane was not connected to the hash boards correctly (off by a pin or upside down).


Or the lack of copper in the board itself cause the trails to overheat. IMET chose to cut costs, we paid the price.

Didn't IMET create the boards based on your given specs? Are you stating that they have breached their contract?

Yes but incorporated their own alternations, component replacements and failed to order to correct amount of copper. and we're suing them for that among a few other things. And when they refund our money, we'll refund our clients.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
IMET, did you manufacture this board?

The one with the burn marks?

We did make that and it was not damaged when delivered to AMT.  One of two things caused that failure.  Either the backplane was shorted out (likely to the hash board heatsinks) or the backplane was not connected to the hash boards correctly (off by a pin or upside down).


Or the lack of copper in the board itself cause the trails to overheat. IMET chose to cut costs, we paid the price.

Didn't IMET create the boards based on your given specs? Are you stating that they have breached their contract?
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
If that was a short and not an overheat, wouldn't a very short piece of track be totally be destroyed, rather than the longer section we see here?
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
IMET, did you manufacture this board?

The one with the burn marks?


We did make that and it was not damaged when delivered to AMT.  One of two things caused that failure.  Either the backplane was shorted out (likely to the hash board heatsinks) or the backplane was not connected to the hash boards correctly (off by a pin or upside down).


Or the lack of copper in the board itself cause the trails to overheat. IMET chose to cut costs, we paid the price.
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
IMET, did you manufacture this board?

The one with the burn marks?


We did make that and it was not damaged when delivered to AMT.  One of two things caused that failure.  Either the backplane was shorted out (likely to the hash board heatsinks) or the backplane was not connected to the hash boards correctly (off by a pin or upside down).
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
IMET, did you manufacture this board?

The one with the burn marks?

sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
Were there any legal proceedings in regards to this?

yes. ongoing.
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
Were there any legal proceedings in regards to this?
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
I am posting this here since it was deleted by AMT on the New Official AMT Thread and was in response to continued public deformation of IMET.

Cease and desist on these acts of public deformation of IMET.  The truth will come out in the proper forum based on your lawsuit post.

Your previous remarks, posts and comments regarding AMT, our dealings, and just about everything you discussed was a direct breach of contract based on the NDA you signed at the start of our dealings.

Threatening the "mysterious answer" of how to fix the boards for an additional payment you felt was due for a 90% failed production run, was a sleazy thing to do.

Your production is what caused our boards to fail, plain and simple.  We have the original boards and all of them suffer from one specific flaw which after more than one PCB diagnostician analyzed them each came to same conclusion - which is IMET failed to do something vital during their production process. The lack of which caused almost all the modules to fail immediately or shortly there after. Those which lasted through testing did not survive more than a few weeks to a month.

IMET If you care so much about your reputation you'll refund us so that we can refund our clients. Or we'll continue and sue you for a lot more than the refunded amount. You'll also spend about that much during these proceedings especially if we join you in the class action. Think about it.

ON A PUBLIC FORUM  

AS SOON AS IMET ISSUES US A REFUND FOR THE HUNDREDS OF MODULES WE HAVE THAT DO NOT WORK WE WILL REFUND ALL CLIENTS WISHING TO RECEIVE REFUNDS.

WE HAVE PAID IMET OVER 200,000 DOLLARS - THAT'S A LOT OF REFUNDS.  





fuck you zipkin. you are a lying piece of shit. you have NEVER told the truth. i wish i had .005BTC for every lie you have told on these boards. how were you going to deliver my miner the "first week of January" when you didn't have the damn PCB's in March? you didnt even have the damn power supplies you were crying about! you have ZERO credibility zipkin. you have lied to everyone. you were writing bad checks!!! right, wrong or indifferent in regards to your complaint with IMET it's ILLEGAL to pass bad checks! nevertheless, writing bad checks is exactly the type of lying and deceitful behavior you have exhibited since day 1. you are a crook and con artist. I will consider it a great deed when you are out of business and no longer stealing money from people like me. you have laughed at the misfortune you have brought upon your customers for the last time. keep shelling out money for this lawsuit. im not done with you yet you disgusting pig.
member
Activity: 79
Merit: 10
I am posting this here since it was deleted by AMT on the New Official AMT Thread and was in response to continued public deformation of IMET.

Cease and desist on these acts of public deformation of IMET.  The truth will come out in the proper forum based on your lawsuit post.

Your previous remarks, posts and comments regarding AMT, our dealings, and just about everything you discussed was a direct breach of contract based on the NDA you signed at the start of our dealings.

Threatening the "mysterious answer" of how to fix the boards for an additional payment you felt was due for a 90% failed production run, was a sleazy thing to do.

Your production is what caused our boards to fail, plain and simple.  We have the original boards and all of them suffer from one specific flaw which after more than one PCB diagnostician analyzed them each came to same conclusion - which is IMET failed to do something vital during their production process. The lack of which caused almost all the modules to fail immediately or shortly there after. Those which lasted through testing did not survive more than a few weeks to a month.

IMET If you care so much about your reputation you'll refund us so that we can refund our clients. Or we'll continue and sue you for a lot more than the refunded amount. You'll also spend about that much during these proceedings especially if we join you in the class action. Think about it.

ON A PUBLIC FORUM  

AS SOON AS IMET ISSUES US A REFUND FOR THE HUNDREDS OF MODULES WE HAVE THAT DO NOT WORK WE WILL REFUND ALL CLIENTS WISHING TO RECEIVE REFUNDS.

WE HAVE PAID IMET OVER 200,000 DOLLARS - THAT'S A LOT OF REFUNDS.  


*Yawn* Heard this one before... except they were blaming phin for their short comings. Hey IMET can I have a refund please? Since AMT can't seem to find their money? If this story is true it has a sense of irony to it... the scammer getting scammed? lol
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
Is this the real imet or some shady scam account.One can never be sure in these. They sound reasonable and the other guy does not. Dont know the whole process. In the business one can not just point ones debt to other so even if there was some mishap happening, even then imet wouldnt be responsible for other than amt. methinks this way?
Yes of course I agree. You know that me and some other folks here are responsible for amt failure right Grin
Zipkin is just responsible to collect money and to deliver crap or nothing with constant bulshit and lies
member
Activity: 119
Merit: 10
Is this the real imet or some shady scam account.One can never be sure in these. They sound reasonable and the other guy does not. Dont know the whole process. In the business one can not just point ones debt to other so even if there was some mishap happening, even then imet wouldnt be responsible for other than amt. methinks this way?
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
I am posting this here since it was deleted by AMT on the New Official AMT Thread and was in response to continued public deformation of IMET.

Cease and desist on these acts of public deformation of IMET.  The truth will come out in the proper forum based on your lawsuit post.

Your previous remarks, posts and comments regarding AMT, our dealings, and just about everything you discussed was a direct breach of contract based on the NDA you signed at the start of our dealings.

Threatening the "mysterious answer" of how to fix the boards for an additional payment you felt was due for a 90% failed production run, was a sleazy thing to do.

Your production is what caused our boards to fail, plain and simple.  We have the original boards and all of them suffer from one specific flaw which after more than one PCB diagnostician analyzed them each came to same conclusion - which is IMET failed to do something vital during their production process. The lack of which caused almost all the modules to fail immediately or shortly there after. Those which lasted through testing did not survive more than a few weeks to a month.

IMET If you care so much about your reputation you'll refund us so that we can refund our clients. Or we'll continue and sue you for a lot more than the refunded amount. You'll also spend about that much during these proceedings especially if we join you in the class action. Think about it.

ON A PUBLIC FORUM 

AS SOON AS IMET ISSUES US A REFUND FOR THE HUNDREDS OF MODULES WE HAVE THAT DO NOT WORK WE WILL REFUND ALL CLIENTS WISHING TO RECEIVE REFUNDS.

WE HAVE PAID IMET OVER 200,000 DOLLARS - THAT'S A LOT OF REFUNDS. 





With regards to...Threatening the "mysterious answer" of how to fix the boards for an additional payment you felt was due for a 90% failed production run, was a sleazy thing to do.

IMET response...I can't tell you how to fix the boards because there is nothing wrong with them.  The problem is not the boards.  IMET was responsible for PCB Assembly only and can't be held responsible for anything that happened after the PCB Assemblies were delivered to AMT.  Our final payment from AMT was made on a check from a known closed bank account.  These are the facts.  If AMT wants to slander IMET in public, then IMET has a right to respond.  This is the only reason we are on this forum.
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
I am posting this here since it was deleted by AMT on the New Official AMT Thread and was in response to continued public deformation of IMET.

Cease and desist on these acts of public deformation of IMET.  The truth will come out in the proper forum based on your lawsuit post.

Your previous remarks, posts and comments regarding AMT, our dealings, and just about everything you discussed was a direct breach of contract based on the NDA you signed at the start of our dealings.

Threatening the "mysterious answer" of how to fix the boards for an additional payment you felt was due for a 90% failed production run, was a sleazy thing to do.

Your production is what caused our boards to fail, plain and simple.  We have the original boards and all of them suffer from one specific flaw which after more than one PCB diagnostician analyzed them each came to same conclusion - which is IMET failed to do something vital during their production process. The lack of which caused almost all the modules to fail immediately or shortly there after. Those which lasted through testing did not survive more than a few weeks to a month.

IMET If you care so much about your reputation you'll refund us so that we can refund our clients. Or we'll continue and sue you for a lot more than the refunded amount. You'll also spend about that much during these proceedings especially if we join you in the class action. Think about it.

ON A PUBLIC FORUM 

AS SOON AS IMET ISSUES US A REFUND FOR THE HUNDREDS OF MODULES WE HAVE THAT DO NOT WORK WE WILL REFUND ALL CLIENTS WISHING TO RECEIVE REFUNDS.

WE HAVE PAID IMET OVER 200,000 DOLLARS - THAT'S A LOT OF REFUNDS. 


STOP FUCKING WITH US.

WE'RE DONE TAKING EVERYONE'S SHIT AND WILL START ACTING ACCORDINGLY DUE TO THE LAWS OF THESE GREAT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.


Poserko (AKA Zipkin)
Did your customers have paid to IMET?
You are the one who took their money. So it is your problem if IMET are going to refund you or not
You are the one who own money to folks here NOT IMET!!!!
So do not make any connection to IMET and YOUR DEBTS!

sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
I am posting this here since it was deleted by AMT on the New Official AMT Thread and was in response to continued public deformation of IMET.

Cease and desist on these acts of public deformation of IMET.  The truth will come out in the proper forum based on your lawsuit post.

Your previous remarks, posts and comments regarding AMT, our dealings, and just about everything you discussed was a direct breach of contract based on the NDA you signed at the start of our dealings.

Threatening the "mysterious answer" of how to fix the boards for an additional payment you felt was due for a 90% failed production run, was a sleazy thing to do.

Your production is what caused our boards to fail, plain and simple.  We have the original boards and all of them suffer from one specific flaw which after more than one PCB diagnostician analyzed them each came to same conclusion - which is IMET failed to do something vital during their production process. The lack of which caused almost all the modules to fail immediately or shortly there after. Those which lasted through testing did not survive more than a few weeks to a month.

IMET If you care so much about your reputation you'll refund us so that we can refund our clients. Or we'll continue and sue you for a lot more than the refunded amount. You'll also spend about that much during these proceedings especially if we join you in the class action. Think about it.

ON A PUBLIC FORUM  

AS SOON AS IMET ISSUES US A REFUND FOR THE HUNDREDS OF MODULES WE HAVE THAT DO NOT WORK WE WILL REFUND ALL CLIENTS WISHING TO RECEIVE REFUNDS.

WE HAVE PAID IMET OVER 200,000 DOLLARS - THAT'S A LOT OF REFUNDS.  



newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
I am posting this here since it was deleted by AMT on the New Official AMT Thread and was in response to continued public deformation of IMET.

Cease and desist on these acts of public deformation of IMET.  The truth will come out in the proper forum based on your lawsuit post.
hero member
Activity: 833
Merit: 1001
you guys were shady since the beginning... not being open and clear, hiding address pretending as if this was due to security and etc, escaping customers' questions, refunds, trying to reopen new threads just because your shady business was getting exposed... anyway i'm glad my intuition proved me right on fraudsters like you...

Isn't this site mirrored somewhere, might be able to check there..

https://bitcointa.lk/

And this may be the only instance when we highly appreciate that.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
Isn't this site mirrored somewhere, might be able to check there..

https://bitcointa.lk/

And this may be the only instance when we highly appreciate that.
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1220
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1756
Verified Bernie Bro - Feel The Bern!
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
IMET is a reputable contract manufacturing and product development company that has been in business for 14 years.  Our reputation is utmost important, so we wanted to address the negative allegations presented by AMT and Josh Zipkin. 

IMET was contracted to build Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs) for AMT miners in February of 2014.  The Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs) were built to print from various design revisions that were supplied by AMT through Bitmine.  IMET did supply the parts and any part substitutions/placement changes were approved in advance by Bitmine and/or AMT.  IMET does not buy parts from the gray market.  Per our ISO-9000 requirements, we only purchase parts from approved vendors.

After thorough inspection including AOI (Automatic Optical Inspection), the PCBs were delivered to AMT.  Prior to delivery, IMET did verify that the individual PCBs would hash at approximately 200gh/s.  The only discrepancy seen was when there were bad cores in an A1 chip.  In this case, the hash rate was lower depending on the number of working cores.   

AMT was responsible for the mechanical designs, thermal designs (heatsinks), assembly, final test and QC.  The IMET engineering team can confirm that the boards (hash, main, and backplane) worked fine as delivered prior to processing by AMT.

IMET is very competitive in our industry and the prices we charged AMT were fair and reasonable for the work that we did.  Some engineering time was gratis to help keep things moving.  During our last meeting, Josh/AMT wrote a check for services rendered but the bank account had inadequate funds. 

The material that was still left in the shop is being held as collateral until final payment is made.  In the meantime, the IMET engineering team used new boards that were never in AMT’s possession to build up working miners.  The problem is not in the electronics hardware; however, there are opportunities for the PCBs to be optimized.  IMET will give the manufacturing plans to AMT after payment in full for previous and current services rendered.       
Jump to: