HD wallets do not really have much of an effect on the received address count as most people will reuse the same address. It's the outgoing transactions that will get a new change address each time but none-HD wallets do that anyway.
I think your misunderstanding HD wallets.
Honestly I still don't get it myself.I think your misunderstanding HD wallets.
What I would like is to have an address to receive payments (for example, from a job, signature campaign, whatever) that generates new addresses automatically so it's more private. I don't know if this makes sense. Like, giving away a fixed address, but once people pay to that address, i get the coins in through new addresses so it doesn't show up on the blockchain the address i gave publicly. Hope this makes any sense.
what about having address(let's call them "super address") that can't be viewed in the blockchain? could this be possible? it sounds more feasible than your proposal
I would love the option of purposely masking (making it invisible) for certain transactions to be invisible in the blockchain, but that would defeat the principle of transparency that acts as a solution for double spending problems and whatnot..
