Topic: In police state America, war is peace (Read 1101 times)
Obama is terrible. Clinton/Rand Paul will be worse.
leader now as if elected by the people, but not at all, all is nonsense, all arranged by a conspiracy of the world, the proof is the leader now that he is led by the people, policies strongly in favor of the people, on the contrary, the policy made increasingly making people suffer, I suggest to the leader of this kind ought to resign, because people have no longer trust the leader, or better known as the crisis of leadership ... 
Be happy that Obama's major bombing focus is outside the country.
What happens when he gets some other country to make the machines of war so that he doesn't need us any more? Is anybody so foolish to think that he wouldn't bomb at home if he was sufficiently supplied from elsewhere?
What happens when he gets some other country to make the machines of war so that he doesn't need us any more? Is anybody so foolish to think that he wouldn't bomb at home if he was sufficiently supplied from elsewhere?
I'm always amazed by all the Obama bashing that goes around here.
http://memegenerator.net fucked up the line breaks after I hit Generate.
The leaders are not our leaders. JFK was the last elected president who tried to lead a populist agenda. The candidate of today is endorsed and anointed to represent the dark monarchy and unlike the past where the seed of power had a high profile, the new monarchs hide as controlling interest shareholders of entities that never perish and act as a permanent pariah on society.
Be happy that Obama's major bombing focus is outside the country.
What happens when he gets some other country to make the machines of war so that he doesn't need us any more? Is anybody so foolish to think that he wouldn't bomb at home if he was sufficiently supplied from elsewhere?
What happens when he gets some other country to make the machines of war so that he doesn't need us any more? Is anybody so foolish to think that he wouldn't bomb at home if he was sufficiently supplied from elsewhere?
I'm always amazed by all the Obama bashing that goes around here. I mean, I certainly don't like his policies, but I'm under no illusion that any other candidate from the two main parties (that typically represent pretty much the same interests) would act any differently on the major issues - maybe with the possible exception of the US likely having attacked Iran by now, if a Republican was in power.
Yes, and it's the same for any other president. Used to be that we didn't have the Internet forums. Ike was a war hero, so we may not have bashed him. Kennedy was assassinated, so we honor him, at least for that. But the rest of them will be bashed in turn as are all leaders.
Be happy that Obama's major bombing focus is outside the country.
What happens when he gets some other country to make the machines of war so that he doesn't need us any more? Is anybody so foolish to think that he wouldn't bomb at home if he was sufficiently supplied from elsewhere?
What happens when he gets some other country to make the machines of war so that he doesn't need us any more? Is anybody so foolish to think that he wouldn't bomb at home if he was sufficiently supplied from elsewhere?
I'm always amazed by all the Obama bashing that goes around here. I mean, I certainly don't like his policies, but I'm under no illusion that any other candidate from the two main parties (that typically represent pretty much the same interests) would act any differently on the major issues - maybe with the possible exception of the US likely having attacked Iran by now, if a Republican was in power.
Be happy that Obama's major bombing focus is outside the country.
What happens when he gets some other country to make the machines of war so that he doesn't need us any more? Is anybody so foolish to think that he wouldn't bomb at home if he was sufficiently supplied from elsewhere?
What happens when he gets some other country to make the machines of war so that he doesn't need us any more? Is anybody so foolish to think that he wouldn't bomb at home if he was sufficiently supplied from elsewhere?
Obama, the noble American warrior, known for being exceptionally skilled in:
** Bombing weddings
** Signing into law the indefinite detention of US citizens, and their murder without due process
** Peace
Cheer up, at least he's the first black president. That's all that mattered when you voted for him anyway, don't you dare deny it.
** Bombing weddings
** Signing into law the indefinite detention of US citizens, and their murder without due process
** Peace
Cheer up, at least he's the first black president. That's all that mattered when you voted for him anyway, don't you dare deny it.
lol the best part was the one about Obama
Wait, what?
Obama, the noble American warrior, known for being exceptionally skilled in:
** Bombing weddings
** Signing into law the indefinite detention of US citizens, and their murder without due process
** Peace
Cheer up, at least he's the first black president. That's all that mattered when you voted for him anyway, don't you dare deny it.
** Bombing weddings
** Signing into law the indefinite detention of US citizens, and their murder without due process
** Peace
Cheer up, at least he's the first black president. That's all that mattered when you voted for him anyway, don't you dare deny it.
lol the best part was the one about Obama
How many people you have to kill to get Nobel prize
Obama, the noble American warrior, known for being exceptionally skilled in:
** Bombing weddings
** Signing into law the indefinite detention of US citizens, and their murder without due process
** Peace
Cheer up, at least he's the first black president. That's all that mattered when you voted for him anyway, don't you dare deny it.
** Bombing weddings
** Signing into law the indefinite detention of US citizens, and their murder without due process
** Peace
Cheer up, at least he's the first black president. That's all that mattered when you voted for him anyway, don't you dare deny it.
Jump to: