Topic: Innosilicon A9 - lots of invalid shares (Read 190 times)
Same here. Received 2 a9, and on both rejection rate about 25-32%
Powermining seems to handle A9 very well. We are a small pool so it takes time between each blocks and payouts. Performance mode is recommended to reach a decent speed on A9.
Equihash Pool Status: https://www.powermining.pw/site/gomining?algo=equihash
Zencash(ZEN):
Zelcash(ZEL):
Zclassic(ZCL):
VoteCoin(VOT):
Bitcoin Private(BTCP):
Equihash Pool Status: https://www.powermining.pw/site/gomining?algo=equihash
Zencash(ZEN):
Code:
URL: stratum+tcp://pool.powermining.pw:2142
Worker: YOUR ZENCASH WALLET ADDRESS
Password: Any password to identify your worker
Worker: YOUR ZENCASH WALLET ADDRESS
Password: Any password to identify your worker
Zelcash(ZEL):
Code:
URL: stratum+tcp://pool.powermining.pw:2143
Worker: YOUR ZELCASH WALLET ADDRESS
Password: Any password to identify your worker
Worker: YOUR ZELCASH WALLET ADDRESS
Password: Any password to identify your worker
Zclassic(ZCL):
Code:
URL: stratum+tcp://pool.powermining.pw:2144
Worker: YOUR ZCLASSIC WALLET ADDRESS
Password: Any password to identify your worker
Worker: YOUR ZCLASSIC WALLET ADDRESS
Password: Any password to identify your worker
VoteCoin(VOT):
Code:
URL: stratum+tcp://pool.powermining.pw:2145
Worker: YOUR VOTECOIN WALLET ADDRESS
Password: Any password to identify your worker
Worker: YOUR VOTECOIN WALLET ADDRESS
Password: Any password to identify your worker
Bitcoin Private(BTCP):
Code:
URL: stratum+tcp://pool.powermining.pw:2146
Worker: YOUR BTCP WALLET ADDRESS
Password: Any password to identify your worker
Worker: YOUR BTCP WALLET ADDRESS
Password: Any password to identify your worker
Just received an A9 Innosilicon miner which should do 50 Kh/s according to specs. Currently have it generating about 26% invalid shares and this seems consistent across various pools including Suprnova (ZEC and ZEN), Flypool, F2Pool and Slushpool.
Anyone else having similar experiences? I suspect it could be a similar situation to the Z9 from Bitmain that required pools to update their software to handle these new fast beasts..
A9 dashboard is broken. If you're getting 26% rejects poolside then there is either something wrong with your setup or your A9.
Just received an A9 Innosilicon miner which should do 50 Kh/s according to specs. Currently have it generating about 26% invalid shares and this seems consistent across various pools including Suprnova (ZEC and ZEN), Flypool, F2Pool and Slushpool.
Anyone else having similar experiences? I suspect it could be a similar situation to the Z9 from Bitmain that required pools to update their software to handle these new fast beasts..
Jump to: