It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
{
"workername": "16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr.T2Turbo",
"hashrate1m": "20.9T",
"hashrate5m": "21.2T", it fluxes up and down It has been running for 2 hours and 20 minutes
"hashrate1hr": "20T",
"hashrate1d": "3.34T",
"hashrate7d": "10.7T",
"lastshare": 1537303177,
"shares": 90024400,
"bestshare": 218091951.0,
"lns": 2871827565.390814,
"luck": 1.0,
"herp": 2870863732.619356
},
[quote author=philipma1957 link=topic=3926710.msg44995438#msg44995438 date=1535746600]
[quote author=sarcheer link=topic=3926710.msg44994187#msg44994187 date=1535744356]
What about performance +? Talking about the T2T
[/quote]
the best setting for efficiency is the efficiency setting
17.50th and 1450 watts or 82 watts a th
Efficiency ----- 17.50 th at 82 watts a th
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
19.55th and 1720 watt
balance-------- 19.55 th at 88 watts a th
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
factory---------
performance--- 2376 watts my meter can not stand to do 2200 to 2400 watts long term I will do an hour test with meter attached
edit
Meter simply does not allow me to run at 2376 watts so I ended test.
[/quote]
[quote author=philipma1957 link=topic=3926710.msg45144895#msg45144895 date=1535995364]
[quote author=Biffa link=topic=3926710.msg45142891#msg45142891 date=1535992558]
390 to one bitcoin address, but they may be using more than one.
Someone spent near $360K on them in the last few days. :o 8)
[/quote]
Well on efficiency and balanced mine has been very good. 82 watts a th on eff and 87 watts a th on bal
factory and performance it is a power hog about 100 watts a th
[/quote]
[quote author=philipma1957 link=topic=3926710.msg44488135#msg44488135 date=1534909925]
Okay. My unit showed up the other day Monday the 20th.
I get about 17500 th at 1450 watts.
This is close to 82 watts a th.
It is a good number
So what does the firmware do?
Optimize hash. Does not mean optimize power.
So. Will hash go up and power go up? = not what I want.
Will hash go up and power stay the same = very good
Will hash stay the same and power drop = best
I have only made one purchase from you this unit.
I don’t want high power use
[/quote]
[quote author=philipma1957 link=topic=3926710.msg44512992#msg44512992 date=1534949937]
[quote author=minefarmbuy link=topic=3926710.msg44511886#msg44511886 date=1534948613]
I agree, more specific notes on the updates would be nice. For me though if it was working well why touch it but then you're proposes and skills are a lot different.
Others, be careful as we're talking T2 and T2T in here, so watch what firmware you're using on which unit.
[/quote]
yeah part of doing these reviews is so that others don't take the risk of shit firmware upgrade.
so I did the up grade to this one
For your better user experience, please download onto:
http://www.innosilicon.com.cn/download/t2t_20180814_092800.swu
and my balanced is now at 20.49 but the power moved to 1876 watts so 1876 / 20490 = 91.5 watts a th which is not as good as the numbers before which were 89 watts a th.
I will check efficiency setting next.
and fans are faster but unit is cool. 57 c
so about 1 more th and 110 more watts for balanced. this is all fine and good if btc jumps higher. but instead of giving less watts and the same hash better watts per th
it is more watts and more hash worse watts per th exactly what I did not want.
I will test balanced next
I will also attempt to roll back firmware after that which may not be possible since I don't have that file
And @ Inno_Asic give me a link for original firmware not the newest.
For your better user experience, please download onto:
http://www.innosilicon.com.cn/download/t2t_20180814_092800.swu
For your better user experience, please download onto:
http://www.innosilicon.com.cn/download/t2_20180814_100830.swu
So I have the two above
give me the first one that came with the machine
[b]Note T2Turbo is what I have[/b]
[/quote]
[quote author=philipma1957 link=topic=3926710.msg44513892#msg44513892 date=1534951107]
[quote author=minefarmbuy link=topic=3926710.msg44513359#msg44513359 date=1534950423]
Can you or anyone else read decibel level or give a general opinion on noise level?
[/quote]
well the firmware upgrade fucked up the noise level since it boosted fan speed.
It was far better then an s9
fan speed was 50 and temps were 63c for efficiency
fan speed was 73 and temps were 63c for balanced
now
fan speed is 90% and temps are 50c for efficiency
fan speed is 90% and temps are 56c for balanced
so typical innosilicon BS which is why I never purchased a unit from them until I got this one from you.
I will keep this one and if I can not roll back firmware I won't be buying anymore.
I will also mark all innosilicon products with neg feedback if I can not roll back this upgrade.
and mark all innosilicon reps with negative feedback if I am unable to roll back this firmware.
Only because I asked a specific question and was given what I suspected was a false fake answer.
my question:
[quote author=philipma1957 link=topic=3926710.msg44488135#msg44488135 date=1534909925]
Okay. My unit showed up the other day Monday the 20th.
I get about 17500 th at 1450 watts.
This is close to 82 watts a th.
It is a good number
So what does the firmware do?
Optimize hash. Does not mean optimize power.
So. Will hash go up and power go up? = not what I want.
Will hash go up and power stay the same = very good
Will hash stay the same and power drop = best
I have only made one purchase from you this unit.
I don’t want high power use
[/quote]
fake reply:
[quote author=Inno_ASIC link=topic=3926710.msg44490685#msg44490685 date=1534916962]
Dear Valuable Innosilicon Miner User,
We’re glad to inform you that the [b]firmware of T2 has been optimized[/b] again though unremitting efforts of our Innosilicon Firmware team.
For your better user experience, please download onto:
http://www.innosilicon.com.cn/download/t2_20180814_100830.swu
[b]Upated items:
- Improved the over-temperature protection performance;
- Optimized the start-up process of miners;[/b]
You can upgrade the firmware as shown below:
http://www.innosilicon.com/statics/images/20180822134042.png
Please send email or add Skype [email protected] to our technical support team if you meet some problem when you update the firmware.
Thank you.
Innosilicon customer service team
[/quote]
[/quote]
[quote author=philipma1957 link=topic=3926710.msg44521352#msg44521352 date=1534961799]
[quote author=minefarmbuy link=topic=3926710.msg44519517#msg44519517 date=1534959034]
Why even bother releasing the update. . ..
They should have the firmware posted for roll back. Philip, not to poke the bear but a basic reply is all I might expect from their forum account. Hopefully once they get to business hours over there they'll update and list the original firmware. We'll give them a chance to help us out.
[/quote]
yeah I will wait but as for now the new august 14 update is unacceptable garbage 90% fans vs 50% fans 85 watts a th vs 82 watts a th.
100 watts more power for 1th more hash which is not what I wanted for efficiency setting.
I would have preferred 0 watts more power for .5th hash
or 100 watts less for 1th less
which would be 1350 watts and 17 th or 79 watts per 1th
I sent an email to support. I will wait to see if they reply.
[/quote]
[quote author=philipma1957 link=topic=3926710.msg44533250#msg44533250 date=1534989174]
I got a reply on facebook
I have the oem file
/Users/macmini/Desktop/T2Turbo Firmware/t2t_20180803_112014.swu
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UsOjQnBMx2FxCqRmJEvdeRSgjwUhfI5W/view
I will fuck with it tomorrow.
[/quote]
[quote author=philipma1957 link=topic=3926710.msg44574714#msg44574714 date=1535053475]
To be on point kudos to Innosilicon they replied in under 20 hours with oem file
I ask on facebook they gave an answer.
I ask via pm they gave an answer.
I ask via email they gave an answer.
I am going to redo firmware now as fan speed on 85% is too loud.
It is back
and room is hot but fans dropped to 60% which is much better then 85%
power dropped to 1450 vs 1498
hash drops just a little say 18200 to 17700 waiting for auto tune to settle.
[url=https://i.imgur.com/5y1W0JT.png][img height=200]https://i.imgur.com/5y1W0JT.png[/img][/url] [url=https://i.imgur.com/5MMs1Va.png][img height=200]https://i.imgur.com/5MMs1Va.png[/img][/url] [url=https://i.imgur.com/Xx77pDT.png][img height=200]https://i.imgur.com/Xx77pDT.png[/img][/url]
[/quote]
[quote author=philipma1957 link=topic=3926710.msg44605723#msg44605723 date=1535115028]
[quote author=Inno_ASIC link=topic=3926710.msg44598874#msg44598874 date=1535104706]
Dear all,
Thank you all for feedback about the new firmware of T2T.
It maybe set fans to 90%. But fans will go down after running about one hour.
And we are also developing a new firmware to improve this problem.
Thank you so much.
[/quote]
Yes they did drop to 85%
and on efficiency setting it does very close to same watts per gh. say 83 or 84 a th vs 81 or 82.
I am doing all testing in a place where sound matters.
When I set up in solar array I will do newer firmware as sound does not matter.
I really want to thank you for giving the older file so I could roll back.
Bitmain was a fucking asshole about this with the s-9 for along time.
You guys did the right thing giving access to older file.
Thank you again.
[/quote]
[quote author=philipma1957 link=topic=3926710.msg44768380#msg44768380 date=1535373488]
So far at efficiency setting
I do 1450 watts at wall
and about 17340 gh which is 83.6 watts
It does better at night when garage is cooler.
I know of no other gear this efficient
I kept stock firmware as my unit is cool and fanspeed is a bit lower.
I wish they were cheaper in price as they are close to 1725 if you use crypto to pay.
1592 bank order
.255456 btc is 1724.52 at coinbase
30.14 ltc is 1743.29 at coinbase
I do like the 83.6 watts a lot. but it is a little bit under spec.
I should burn around 1398 watts to do 17340 hash not 1450
When room cools we will see if it improves.
[/quote]
[quote author=philipma1957 link=topic=3926710.msg44887720#msg44887720 date=1535577631]
[quote author=sarcheer link=topic=3926710.msg44885637#msg44885637 date=1535574112]
"Aug 29 15:28:23 InnoMiner cgminer[1319]: chain1: detected 93 chips"
According to the logs for my T2T there are 93 chips per chain.
[/quote]
I looked for that for so long!
thank you for posting it.
So 93 x 3 = 279
17,350/279 = 62 gh a chip at efficiency setting
I do about 1450 watts at k-watt meter so close to 5 watts a chip simple math says 5.197 watts but there are 2 fans and a controller.
These would be nice usb sticks
better yet 5 chip pods
hmm 25 watts and 310 gh
[/quote]