This comes to me as a shocker. With the type of security TF had in place. The way the attack has been performed seems to me a tricky and sophisticated attack.
With the type of security TF
claimed to have in place.
4100 BTC in a hot wallet, WTF?
it looks like 2011 all over again
I agree. I smell something fishy here. 4000+ in a hot wallet was a disaster waiting to happen.
I think he was waiting for this payday.! Not sure if the hack is true or not
If you like a good riddle, I suggest you read the whole thread in the main section ....just some tidbits
TF claimed that as a precaution that even if the server is hacked there will not be much damage as cold wallet is being used
The server has hacked on 26th Oct, but the news is displayed today
One of the api user suggested to TF that inputs.io was hacked around 3 weeks back
Yes i did it for a while but then i figured that it is too good to be true.
Either he is too dumb to have all the 4000 btc under same account on the same server or he is just vacating in Cancoon laughing at people.
He claims he was in shock trying to figure out a way for 14 days so that no IO user lost coins.. Seriously, for 14 days.??
Being a forensics investigator, i know that this is another mistake.. Now all the evidence has gone with the wind.
At the least he could do was disable any deposits. There are many users who have deposited btc this week. That means that those coins are safe and they should get full refund. But that is not the case. They are also getting a partial refund. How fair is that.?
