Topic: Interstellar 10/10 (Read 4334 times)
Personally, I loved the film. One of the reasons the 5ths need Cooper is that they no longer are able to communicate, or maybe even think, in just the three dimensions we do now. It's possible they wouldn't think of Saturn as far from Earth at all.
Am I just being stupid or is that a paradox?
If he doesn't get the coordinates to NASA, he doesn't go to NASA. He doesn't go to NASA, he doesn't go to space. He doesn't go to space, he doesn't send NASA's coordinates to the past. He doesn't send NASA's coordinates to the past, he doesn't go to NASA.
If he doesn't get the coordinates to NASA, he doesn't go to NASA. He doesn't go to NASA, he doesn't go to space. He doesn't go to space, he doesn't send NASA's coordinates to the past. He doesn't send NASA's coordinates to the past, he doesn't go to NASA.
Yes that is the paradox, it arises from linear time, where one event must precede the other. In non linear time, events can exist at the same time.
An analogy is 2d and 3d. If you are an ant in a glass and are limited to the ground plane, you are trapped. If you are a smart ant, and are aware of a third orthogonal dimension, you can escape the spatial trap by taking advantage of it.
The idea is the the future humans, aliens, etc...have discovered this orthogonal time dimension, or multiple dimensions.
Am I just being stupid or is that a paradox?
If he doesn't get the coordinates to NASA, he doesn't go to NASA. He doesn't go to NASA, he doesn't go to space. He doesn't go to space, he doesn't send NASA's coordinates to the past. He doesn't send NASA's coordinates to the past, he doesn't go to NASA.
If he doesn't get the coordinates to NASA, he doesn't go to NASA. He doesn't go to NASA, he doesn't go to space. He doesn't go to space, he doesn't send NASA's coordinates to the past. He doesn't send NASA's coordinates to the past, he doesn't go to NASA.
I couldn't finish gravity.. there was no storyline or scifi that got me interested. I don't get it. Interstellar on the other hand.. probably the best space move I've seen. They actually apply quantum mechanics too.
I like Sandra so the plot was not important.
Really the best space movie? What about Space Odyssey, Star Trek, Contact... There's a lot of great space movies out there
The film was bearable inspite of the leads. Sandra was alright, nothing special, but Clooney was terrible.
Comparing Gravity and Interstellar does not make sense. Both very different types of films.
I prefer InterStellar rather than Gravity and Jupiter Ascending
Some body PLease give me the download link
http://torrentbutler.eu/157336-interstellar
Some body PLease give me the download link
very nice movie, I watched from the begining..,
best movies till now in my life..
9/10
best movies till now in my life..
9/10
I couldn't finish gravity.. there was no storyline or scifi that got me interested. I don't get it. Interstellar on the other hand.. probably the best space move I've seen. They actually apply quantum mechanics too.
I like Sandra so the plot was not important.
Really the best space movie? What about Space Odyssey, Star Trek, Contact... There's a lot of great space movies out there
The film was bearable inspite of the leads. Sandra was alright, nothing special, but Clooney was terrible.
Comparing Gravity and Interstellar does not make sense. Both very different types of films.
Any of you have link to mediafire off interstellar, 10/10 
?
?I thought I was in the altcoin section first and that you were talking about Stellar.
lol. That stellar is sort of dead right now. Hearing nothing from the developers
I thought I was in the altcoin section first and that you were talking about Stellar.
Interstellar 9/10
I loved the soundtrack, I loved the story line, I loved the special effects, and I don't understand why some people didn't like it.
I loved the soundtrack, I loved the story line, I loved the special effects, and I don't understand why some people didn't like it.
I think the soundtrack in the movie makes it 10 times better to watch.
CERN didn't make any black holes and we're all still alive, I can't believe people are still actually trying to believe in this bullshit peddled by a science professor from a high school and yes, that's where this 'theory' came from and at best, it's a stupid poorly thought out theory and at it's worse something that was concocted by a religious lunatic to try and shut down the project because it is one more nail in the coffin of creationism.
You're an idiot
Before I even read the rest of the crap you just pooped out here kindly tell me what gave you the right to make a personal remark here ?
Watched interstellar. it was pretty bad.
If some mysterious aliens could drop off a portal that went to a bunch of different habitable planets then you would think they could just save earths climate.
If some mysterious aliens could drop off a portal that went to a bunch of different habitable planets then you would think they could just save earths climate.
They were not mysterious aliens.. It was explained who those people were.
That "mysterious force" came from humans in the future who had access to 5th dimension, which transcended time.
Hahaha you didnt understand shit my friend
The movie said it COULD be humans but who it really was, was never shown.
This is a classical causality paradox that arises when time is considered as a linear entity. If time is considered not linear, where singular events are considered the super position of all events, everything can exist at once.
If your familiar with quantum mechanics this called a wave function collapse. The matter waves exist in all states, until they are observed then lock into a single form.
In the movie, all events exist at the same time, until an observer locks the event by observing it, principle of super position.
The future humans made the worm hole because it always existed, but it didn't exist until they made it. This is the paradox. From one point of view the worm hole never existed, from another it always existed. If these points are view are merged in a particular manner you get causality
Even A caused event B
Yes I know its very confusing and not satisfying..too bad
About worm holes, they are a consequence of particular solutions to Einstein's field equations, but they have never been observed and are only theoretical..The poster above who said nature makes them all the time is lying. Just because they are mathematically possible doesn't mean they are physically possible.
Magnetic mono-poles are mathematically possible in Maxwell's equations, but they have never been observed. A magnet with only a north or south.
Kip Thorne was the science adviser and apparently the modelling of the black hole gargantua was the most realistic simulation ever done and matched very well with the field equations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kip_Thorne
http://news.discovery.com/space/interstellar-black-hole-is-best-black-hole-in-sci-fi-141029.htm
As someone who studied physics formally, the movie was pure science porn. A+. There was even a correctly placed '-g' for gravity in a particular field equation on a blackboard. Very well done.
I am not sure why you made this post, also, the fact that I know and understand superposition property principle doesnt mean everyone else will. What really confuses me about your post is the reason for it's existence.
Also, do you want me to take you for a trip to the LHC ? Where they were actively recreating mini wormholes and blackholes which are mathematically proved while evidential proof have recently been detected in the form of Higgs particles ?
The fact that we cant yet detect them with that big of an instrument is the sole reason why the LHC is undergoing an upgrade.
Lastly, if you dont want to believe in the existence of something that is mathematically proven but not yet physically observed then that is more of a philosophical standpoint. As human beings we are lucky enough to even comprehend the vastness of this universe, observing it while being Earth-locked is a long shot.
You're an idiot, First provide evidence of wormholes at CERN, please...I'm waiting. Also please provide evidence of mini black holes, which may be created at high enough eV levels, but have not been yet. Again send me the paper from CERN's website. Here I'll get you started. http://home.web.cern.ch/
I never said I believe mathematical constructs aren't possible, I said they may not be possible.
Quote
Just because they are mathematically possible doesn't mean they are physically possible.
Magnetic mono-poles are mathematically possible in Maxwell's equations, but they have never been observed. A magnet with only a north or south.
Magnetic mono-poles are mathematically possible in Maxwell's equations, but they have never been observed. A magnet with only a north or south.
Please show were I said they are not physically possible? Mathematical models don't work in all circumstances, the inverse square law uses mathematical points. A point electron doesn't exist, the model breaks down at 1/r^2 as r->0, additional models are required to resolve this inconsistency. Basic em theory says at r=0, an electron has infinite charge. Maybe a worm hole is analogous, the math shows a worm hole at r=0, but maybe the math is incomplete. Until they can be created at will and verified we won't know.
Here is a link you may find of interest.
http://www.englishforeveryone.org/Topics/Reading-Comprehension.htm
Watched interstellar. it was pretty bad.
If some mysterious aliens could drop off a portal that went to a bunch of different habitable planets then you would think they could just save earths climate.
If some mysterious aliens could drop off a portal that went to a bunch of different habitable planets then you would think they could just save earths climate.
They were people from the future, so they needed us (the people from the past) to figure it out. They gave them the fishing rod instead of the fish.
How could there be future humans if the past humans gone extinct?
They didn't because they figured out how to survive but had to pay a bigger price, so they went back and helped people from the past to save some more and make them understand the theoretical concepts they were working on. In other words they survived in both past and future, but those from the future lost much more and needed more time to get to where they were.
i didn't call it shoddy because i haven't seen it. but many critic reviews have called it poor writing near the end.
Yes because throughout the movie they presented somewhat scientifically accurate fiction, but in the end it just went hooga booga.
Dvd version is already available on torrents.
Interstellar 9/10
I loved the soundtrack, I loved the story line, I loved the special effects, and I don't understand why some people didn't like it.
I loved the soundtrack, I loved the story line, I loved the special effects, and I don't understand why some people didn't like it.
i didn't call it shoddy because i haven't seen it. but many critic reviews have called it poor writing near the end.
Watched interstellar. it was pretty bad.
If some mysterious aliens could drop off a portal that went to a bunch of different habitable planets then you would think they could just save earths climate.
If some mysterious aliens could drop off a portal that went to a bunch of different habitable planets then you would think they could just save earths climate.
They were not mysterious aliens.. It was explained who those people were.
That "mysterious force" came from humans in the future who had access to 5th dimension, which transcended time.
Hahaha you didnt understand shit my friend
The movie said it COULD be humans but who it really was, was never shown.
This is a classical causality paradox that arises when time is considered as a linear entity. If time is considered not linear, where singular events are considered the super position of all events, everything can exist at once.
If your familiar with quantum mechanics this called a wave function collapse. The matter waves exist in all states, until they are observed then lock into a single form.
In the movie, all events exist at the same time, until an observer locks the event by observing it, principle of super position.
The future humans made the worm hole because it always existed, but it didn't exist until they made it. This is the paradox. From one point of view the worm hole never existed, from another it always existed. If these points are view are merged in a particular manner you get causality
Even A caused event B
Yes I know its very confusing and not satisfying..too bad
About worm holes, they are a consequence of particular solutions to Einstein's field equations, but they have never been observed and are only theoretical..The poster above who said nature makes them all the time is lying. Just because they are mathematically possible doesn't mean they are physically possible.
Magnetic mono-poles are mathematically possible in Maxwell's equations, but they have never been observed. A magnet with only a north or south.
Kip Thorne was the science adviser and apparently the modelling of the black hole gargantua was the most realistic simulation ever done and matched very well with the field equations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kip_Thorne
http://news.discovery.com/space/interstellar-black-hole-is-best-black-hole-in-sci-fi-141029.htm
As someone who studied physics formally, the movie was pure science porn. A+. There was even a correctly placed '-g' for gravity in a particular field equation on a blackboard. Very well done.
I am not sure why you made this post, also, the fact that I know and understand superposition property principle doesnt mean everyone else will. What really confuses me about your post is the reason for it's existence.
Also, do you want me to take you for a trip to the LHC ? Where they were actively recreating mini wormholes and blackholes which are mathematically proved while evidential proof have recently been detected in the form of Higgs particles ?
The fact that we cant yet detect them with that big of an instrument is the sole reason why the LHC is undergoing an upgrade.
Lastly, if you dont want to believe in the existence of something that is mathematically proven but not yet physically observed then that is more of a philosophical standpoint. As human beings we are lucky enough to even comprehend the vastness of this universe, observing it while being Earth-locked is a long shot.
He should have died in the black hole. That would have been a much more acceptable ending and more in sync with the rest of the movie really a tale about sacrifice and loss and how sometimes it's necessary.
Watched interstellar. it was pretty bad.
If some mysterious aliens could drop off a portal that went to a bunch of different habitable planets then you would think they could just save earths climate.
If some mysterious aliens could drop off a portal that went to a bunch of different habitable planets then you would think they could just save earths climate.
They were not mysterious aliens.. It was explained who those people were.
That "mysterious force" came from humans in the future who had access to 5th dimension, which transcended time.
Hahaha you didnt understand shit my friend
The movie said it COULD be humans but who it really was, was never shown.
This is a classical causality paradox that arises when time is considered as a linear entity. If time is considered not linear, where singular events are considered the super position of all events, everything can exist at once.
If your familiar with quantum mechanics this called a wave function collapse. The matter waves exist in all states, until they are observed then lock into a single form.
In the movie, all events exist at the same time, until an observer locks the event by observing it, principle of super position.
The future humans made the worm hole because it always existed, but it didn't exist until they made it. This is the paradox. From one point of view the worm hole never existed, from another it always existed. If these points are view are merged in a particular manner you get causality
Even A caused event B
Yes I know its very confusing and not satisfying..too bad
About worm holes, they are a consequence of particular solutions to Einstein's field equations, but they have never been observed and are only theoretical..The poster above who said nature makes them all the time is lying. Just because they are mathematically possible doesn't mean they are physically possible.
Magnetic mono-poles are mathematically possible in Maxwell's equations, but they have never been observed. A magnet with only a north or south.
Kip Thorne was the science adviser and apparently the modelling of the black hole gargantua was the most realistic simulation ever done and matched very well with the field equations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kip_Thorne
http://news.discovery.com/space/interstellar-black-hole-is-best-black-hole-in-sci-fi-141029.htm
As someone who studied physics formally, the movie was pure science porn. A+. There was even a correctly placed '-g' for gravity in a particular field equation on a blackboard. Very well done.
Watched interstellar. it was pretty bad.
If some mysterious aliens could drop off a portal that went to a bunch of different habitable planets then you would think they could just save earths climate.
If some mysterious aliens could drop off a portal that went to a bunch of different habitable planets then you would think they could just save earths climate.
They were people from the future, so they needed us (the people from the past) to figure it out. They gave them the fishing rod instead of the fish.
How could there be future humans if the past humans gone extinct?
Watched interstellar. it was pretty bad.
If some mysterious aliens could drop off a portal that went to a bunch of different habitable planets then you would think they could just save earths climate.
If some mysterious aliens could drop off a portal that went to a bunch of different habitable planets then you would think they could just save earths climate.
They were not mysterious aliens.. It was explained who those people were.
That "mysterious force" came from humans in the future who had access to 5th dimension, which transcended time.
Hahaha you didnt understand shit my friend
The movie said it COULD be humans but who it really was, was never shown.
Watched interstellar. it was pretty bad.
If some mysterious aliens could drop off a portal that went to a bunch of different habitable planets then you would think they could just save earths climate.
If some mysterious aliens could drop off a portal that went to a bunch of different habitable planets then you would think they could just save earths climate.
They were not mysterious aliens.. It was explained who those people were.
That "mysterious force" came from humans in the future who had access to 5th dimension, which transcended time.
Watched interstellar. it was pretty bad.
If some mysterious aliens could drop off a portal that went to a bunch of different habitable planets then you would think they could just save earths climate.
If some mysterious aliens could drop off a portal that went to a bunch of different habitable planets then you would think they could just save earths climate.
10/10, that movie made my cry.
My question, who created the wormhole?
You should read it on Wikipedia to get more info about Wormhole. My question, who created the wormhole?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole
Did you read it who created the wormhole in the movie? I think Wormhole does not occur naturally.
i heard bitcoin mining will create a wormhole in 2045.
Gravity is crap. (2/10)
Interstellar isn't that bad. (6/10)
As bad as the ending is in Edge of Tomorrow, it's still better than both these movies. (7/10) I like Oblivion better. (8/10)
Interstellar isn't that bad. (6/10)
As bad as the ending is in Edge of Tomorrow, it's still better than both these movies. (7/10) I like Oblivion better. (8/10)
I agree with you gravity is the crap of the three.
Gravity 4/10
Edge of Tomorrow 7/10
Oblivion 8/10
Interstellar 8/10
+1 for the Gravity crap
Interstellar sounds great! Thanks for the tip everyone
Loved it, for me one of the better movies of 2014
Gravity is crap. (2/10)
Interstellar isn't that bad. (6/10)
As bad as the ending is in Edge of Tomorrow, it's still better than both these movies. (7/10) I like Oblivion better. (8/10)
Interstellar isn't that bad. (6/10)
As bad as the ending is in Edge of Tomorrow, it's still better than both these movies. (7/10) I like Oblivion better. (8/10)
I agree with you gravity is the crap of the three.
Gravity 4/10
Edge of Tomorrow 7/10
Oblivion 8/10
Interstellar 8/10
This is a nice movie. I give it 9/10. But I don't like the ending.
apart from the graphics it was pretty lame
I couldn't finish gravity.. there was no storyline or scifi that got me interested. I don't get it. Interstellar on the other hand.. probably the best space move I've seen. They actually apply quantum mechanics too.
I like Sandra so the plot was not important.
Really the best space movie? What about Space Odyssey, Star Trek, Contact... There's a lot of great space movies out there
2001 was like gravity - really thin plot, lots of cinematography. Did not enjoy one bit. And yeah, I know this is not a popular opinion.
.... it doesn't mean they didn't understand ....
... I don't get it....
I wasnt imagining that part where you said you didnt get it. I only said what I said cuz you said what you said.
The main point of that movie Gravity was to simply tell a story about a small group of people in what could be described as the modern / current new frontier of our generation, few hundred years ago it was the discovery of Americas by Columbus.
The movie also shows in detail about the various stages of human psychology in isolation very accurately.
May I ask how far did you actually go into that movie ?
10/10, that movie made my cry.
My question, who created the wormhole?
You should read it on Wikipedia to get more info about Wormhole. My question, who created the wormhole?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole
Did you read it who created the wormhole in the movie? I think Wormhole does not occur naturally.
Not that any wormwhole was ever observed to anyone check if they can be created naturally or not
Wormholes are naturally occurring all the time and almost everywhere, do your research on quantum physics you will get your answer. Practical proof is non existent because we cant observe it or posses enough power to recreate it but theoretically it has been proven.
I couldn't finish gravity.. there was no storyline or scifi that got me interested. I don't get it. Interstellar on the other hand.. probably the best space move I've seen. They actually apply quantum mechanics too.
The story of Gravity is simple, it tells us how precious Gravity really is to us that we take it for granted and never notice it, people that dont understand this simple concept are .... well.. lets just stop there.
Just because someone didn't like the movie, it doesn't mean they didn't understand that concept. If that is the main point of the movie, and I wouldn't have bothered watching. Interstellar had a much, much better plot. It incorporates quantum mechanics, you get to see other planets with water (that planet with the huge tidal waves was awesome), there's an actual story, and the concept of time dilation was pretty awesome.
10/10, that movie made my cry.
My question, who created the wormhole?
You should read it on Wikipedia to get more info about Wormhole. My question, who created the wormhole?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole
Did you read it who created the wormhole in the movie? I think Wormhole does not occur naturally.
Not that any wormwhole was ever observed to anyone check if they can be created naturally or not
Wormholes are naturally occurring all the time and almost everywhere, do your research on quantum physics you will get your answer. Practical proof is non existent because we cant observe it or posses enough power to recreate it but theoretically it has been proven.
I couldn't finish gravity.. there was no storyline or scifi that got me interested. I don't get it. Interstellar on the other hand.. probably the best space move I've seen. They actually apply quantum mechanics too.
The story of Gravity is simple, it tells us how precious Gravity really is to us that we take it for granted and never notice it, people that dont understand this simple concept are .... well.. lets just stop there.
One of the previews for the showing of Interstellar was for the newest Fast and Furious movie. I've never seen any of these Fast films, and I'm not much of a car-chase/race movie fan, but about 20 minutes into Interstellar I turned to my movie date and whispered, "I could use a car crash right about now." Intersteller was okay, but about 30 minutes toolong, and for a while I thought I was watching "Signs", and then, "Frequency" and then...oh...lots of others...
It was fairly good. Dragged on for quite sometime and had some gaping holes.
'Its not possible'
'No, its necessary'
'Its not possible'
'No, its necessary'
Loved it, although i didn't get the part where 1 hour on that planet was 7 years on earth. Had something to do with relativity. Also how did they get to the past to make that 3d time space inside a 5th dimension. I mean is that even possible to travel through time like he did?
I Watched last year end in cinema and found it amazing movie
after watched that, i learn more about relativity theories and space
Nolan's movie usually epic and great
I'll buy bluray version if available
after watched that, i learn more about relativity theories and space
Nolan's movie usually epic and great
I'll buy bluray version if available
Just watched this and thought this was amazing piece of cinema history. This is one of the best films I've seen in a decade and surpasses Gravity. If you haven't watched it you can download the torrent and see what your missing.
Have you seen Inception.
They share a lot of concepts.
Good entertainment but not 10/10.
I couldn't finish gravity.. there was no storyline or scifi that got me interested. I don't get it. Interstellar on the other hand.. probably the best space move I've seen. They actually apply quantum mechanics too.
Just watched this and thought this was amazing piece of cinema history. This is one of the best films I've seen in a decade and surpasses Gravity. If you haven't watched it you can download the torrent and see what your missing.
During the first few minutes of the film it made my blood boil with all those idiots claiming that the Apollo landings were fake, but for a movie to go from age old conspiracy theory all the way to black holes are made by aliens is kinda amazing.
The movie has shown a lot of scientific inaccuracies but with that said this movie comes closest to science reality in the science fiction genre.
10/10, that movie made my cry.
My question, who created the wormhole?
You should read it on Wikipedia to get more info about Wormhole. My question, who created the wormhole?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole
Did you read it who created the wormhole in the movie? I think Wormhole does not occur naturally.
http://www.quora.com/Who-created-the-wormhole-in-the-movie-Interstellar
10/10, that movie made my cry.
My question, who created the wormhole?
You should read it on Wikipedia to get more info about Wormhole. My question, who created the wormhole?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole
Did you read it who created the wormhole in the movie? I think Wormhole does not occur naturally.
Not that any wormwhole was ever observed to anyone check if they can be created naturally or not
Yeah i m downloading this movie . Its an awesome movie guyx
. Its an awesome movie guyx 10/10, that movie made my cry.
My question, who created the wormhole?
You should read it on Wikipedia to get more info about Wormhole. My question, who created the wormhole?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole
Did you read it who created the wormhole in the movie? I think Wormhole does not occur naturally.
10/10, that movie made my cry.
My question, who created the wormhole?
You should read it on Wikipedia to get more info about Wormhole. My question, who created the wormhole?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole
10/10, that movie made my cry.
My question, who created the wormhole?
My question, who created the wormhole?
This movie was too hyped up, so I had high expectations for it. That preconception is what probably ruined it for me. I'd give it 7.5/10
Gravity is crap. (2/10)
Interstellar isn't that bad. (6/10)
As bad as the ending is in Edge of Tomorrow, it's still better than both these movies. (7/10) I like Oblivion better. (8/10)
Interstellar isn't that bad. (6/10)
As bad as the ending is in Edge of Tomorrow, it's still better than both these movies. (7/10) I like Oblivion better. (8/10)
After seeing Gravity right after hearing all the hype I was dissapointed and would rate it a 6/10 after the first viewing. The second time around I bumped it up to an 8/10 because Sandra Bullock did a pretty good job - it's hard to play against nothing.
EoT and Oblivion I liked as well - not as good for cinematics but better Sci-Fi.
Gravity is crap. (2/10)
Interstellar isn't that bad. (6/10)
As bad as the ending is in Edge of Tomorrow, it's still better than both these movies. (7/10) I like Oblivion better. (8/10)
Interstellar isn't that bad. (6/10)
As bad as the ending is in Edge of Tomorrow, it's still better than both these movies. (7/10) I like Oblivion better. (8/10)
Just watched this and thought this was amazing piece of cinema history. This is one of the best films I've seen in a decade and surpasses Gravity. If you haven't watched it you can download the torrent and see what your missing.
Gravity wasn't that great to be honest. I haven't seen Interstellar yet but am waiting for the bluray.
There was some trippy ass shit in that movie.
Interstellar is good, they will make a sequel.Say's who?
Agreed. I watched Interstellar on cinema last year, can't help myself but saying "Wow" many times after watching it. Amazing cinematic experience, the soundtrack does a great job too!
You have to get the book or even the book that explains the science behind Interstellar its a great read!
Interstellar great movie
like that movie too.
8/10
8/10
Well yeah
What were you expecting of Christopher Nolan? Something shit‽
What were you expecting of Christopher Nolan? Something shit‽
Yeah the base of the movie was kind of simple and you could see what was going to happen it was based on things which have already been done
I don't know about that, stunning imagery of course but thought the film was a bit overrated
Agree - pretty much the perfect cinematic experience
There was some trippy ass shit in that movie.
Yeah, and the movie was a bit cheesy in some respects, like talking about Lazarus and love.
There was some trippy ass shit in that movie.
Interstellar is good, they will make a sequel. 
There was some trippy ass shit in that movie.
Just watched this and thought this was amazing piece of cinema history. This is one of the best films I've seen in a decade and surpasses Gravity. If you haven't watched it you can download the torrent and see what your missing.
indeed, best i've seen in years ! Gravity was even more Un-real to be honest...
but yeah GREAT movie !
Just watched this and thought this was amazing piece of cinema history. This is one of the best films I've seen in a decade and surpasses Gravity. If you haven't watched it you can download the torrent and see what your missing.
Jump to: