Seems like the Baltics (or at least the WEF installed 'leaders' of them) really really WANT to be next, but I'm dubious that Russia has much interests except maybe to un-landlock Kaliningrad.
Sweden in particular seems to be dedicated to national suicide and is pursuing that goal on a number of different fronts. Hard to figure out, but pretty clearly the 'collective West' has gone stark raving mad. It's almost like some neuron-eating parasitic (((entity))) has infected their decision-making apparatus or something.
Topic: Is Baltics next war attack target ? (Read 98 times)
Yes, they are.
I don't think Putin would attack Poland even if Trump's manages to become the president of the United States again, even if he manages to withdraw from NATO, Poland would still be a member of the European Union and also there will be many countries left within NATO to defend one another against a Russian invasion of Europe. One also needs to keep in mind that an invasion of Poland would imply Putin managed to counter Ukraine or some truce being established between Ukraine and Russia, so the Kremlin could move their forces to Poland.
Without the US, Ukraine would fall within weeks because they would know it would be inevitable. With a Ukrainian victory, a move into Poland would be the logical next step, and without the US involved things get a lot easier for Russia to maneuver. War has thus far been very, very good for Putin, so it's logical that he will continue to engage in it.
Quote
Even if Trump manages to win, there could still be a faction within the Republican party which would be pretty much willing to continue to fund the Ukrainian defenders, the President as a centralized authority cannot control all aspects of funding or governing; the Senate and the house of representatives still have pretty much an important influence on the funding of both Israel and Ukraine.
Hopefully, all these conflicts will not longer continue to escalate this year, that would be terrible.
Well, funding for Ukraine is being held up by Trump loyalists right now. It doesn't seem to matter what the majority of Republicans think, only what Trump wants. Trump killed the immigration deal, and he's killed the funding for Ukraine for now. He will be twice as powerful when he's actually president and no Republican in his right mind would go against him.
As I understand it, based on military analysis of troop movements, Putin's next target is Poland, which he will have free license to invade once Trump breaks up NATO.
And then of course China will go into Taiwan after Xi offers Trump a "deal" to build Trump Tower Shanghai in exchange for the US not intervening.
After that, Trump will leave office and we'll be left with a world at war that our kids are going to need to fight. This is exactly how WWII started, so it makes sense that WWIII would go the same way: an isolationist "America First" movement in the US causes us to withdraw from the world just long enough for two major military powers from Europe and Asia to gain a foothold.
And then of course China will go into Taiwan after Xi offers Trump a "deal" to build Trump Tower Shanghai in exchange for the US not intervening.
After that, Trump will leave office and we'll be left with a world at war that our kids are going to need to fight. This is exactly how WWII started, so it makes sense that WWIII would go the same way: an isolationist "America First" movement in the US causes us to withdraw from the world just long enough for two major military powers from Europe and Asia to gain a foothold.
I don't think Putin would attack Poland even if Trump's manages to become the president of the United States again, even if he manages to withdraw from NATO, Poland would still be a member of the European Union and also there will be many countries left within NATO to defend one another against a Russian invasion of Europe. One also needs to keep in mind that an invasion of Poland would imply Putin managed to counter Ukraine or some truce being established between Ukraine and Russia, so the Kremlin could move their forces to Poland.
Even if Trump manages to win, there could still be a faction within the Republican party which would be pretty much willing to continue to fund the Ukrainian defenders, the President as a centralized authority cannot control all aspects of funding or governing; the Senate and the house of representatives still have pretty much an important influence on the funding of both Israel and Ukraine.
Hopefully, all these conflicts will not longer continue to escalate this year, that would be terrible.
As I understand it, based on military analysis of troop movements, Putin's next target is Poland, which he will have free license to invade once Trump breaks up NATO.
And then of course China will go into Taiwan after Xi offers Trump a "deal" to build Trump Tower Shanghai in exchange for the US not intervening.
After that, Trump will leave office and we'll be left with a world at war that our kids are going to need to fight. This is exactly how WWII started, so it makes sense that WWIII would go the same way: an isolationist "America First" movement in the US causes us to withdraw from the world just long enough for two major military powers from Europe and Asia to gain a foothold.
And then of course China will go into Taiwan after Xi offers Trump a "deal" to build Trump Tower Shanghai in exchange for the US not intervening.
After that, Trump will leave office and we'll be left with a world at war that our kids are going to need to fight. This is exactly how WWII started, so it makes sense that WWIII would go the same way: an isolationist "America First" movement in the US causes us to withdraw from the world just long enough for two major military powers from Europe and Asia to gain a foothold.
Will be the Baltics next ?
Interesting fact is most of the attacks to ukraine Houses was Made short disantance or from air Force.
Interesting is that only few air forces fighters are capable such a attacks.
Good question here, how come that ukraine did not notice airplanes ? It means been used very hidden way and second question how come short distance missiles was even placed ?
China and USA monitore and watch by satelite survelaince everything they should have right info what was happening exacly.
Will the baltics possible target Estonia will be attacked of Same short distance missiles or air force will be used ?
I asked one old person whos been in airforce long time he said those attacks looking like it was from air plane fighters then this person calculated time when the attacks was occured by the airplane fighter wich can make speed of 2300 km/h becouse the trajectore of plane on map we guess Same air force bombs and missiles could be used in Baltics Also.
Anyone whos knowledged in military will have here many questions all of this.
Interesting fact is most of the attacks to ukraine Houses was Made short disantance or from air Force.
Interesting is that only few air forces fighters are capable such a attacks.
Good question here, how come that ukraine did not notice airplanes ? It means been used very hidden way and second question how come short distance missiles was even placed ?
China and USA monitore and watch by satelite survelaince everything they should have right info what was happening exacly.
Will the baltics possible target Estonia will be attacked of Same short distance missiles or air force will be used ?
I asked one old person whos been in airforce long time he said those attacks looking like it was from air plane fighters then this person calculated time when the attacks was occured by the airplane fighter wich can make speed of 2300 km/h becouse the trajectore of plane on map we guess Same air force bombs and missiles could be used in Baltics Also.
Anyone whos knowledged in military will have here many questions all of this.
Jump to: