Something is a little fishy with this coin in my opinion - new members need to buy in? A select few now have most of the tokens in their hands.
New members who have bought in will receive very little from the airdrop compared to the original larger holders who will continue to receive loads because they were in first. I think the airdrop program after the rule change now rewards the larger wallets disproportionately.
A ponzi by definition needs more new members to buy in to keep the charade going so that older members can cash out.
Now I'm not saying deeponion IS a ponzi but it appears to be sailing damn close to the wind.
Any thoughts folks?
Regards
i respect your freedom of expression and won't prevent you from doing it.
.
but here are my thoughts about your thread.
1. first of all the new rules are easier to comply than the old rules.
2. gaining the required 100 onions is not only obtainable through exchanges, contest, bounties and rewards are continuously being held therefore you can use this to accumulate the minimum amount of onions.
3. i am one of the early members of the airdrop, and i think the old members somehow do deserve an edge as compared to the new ones. old members have been through a lot more criticism and challenges.
we've been there when deeponion was still on its early development and supported it in every way we can.
4. for me it is not a ponzi, because no matter what happens with the price i will still be holding it. i am not gonna dump. and i believe this is also the stand of other early members.