Topic: Is franky1 making libellous statements about BitRefill? (Read 363 times)

Why would Bitrefill or any other cryptocurrency service bother to take someone to court over something as harmless as that? If they disagree with him they're better off refuting his allegations.

Franky will always lose his marbles when it comes to anything related to LN.
Unfortunately for him, his arguments are really pathetic and most of the time when he enters discussions he has no clue about what he is talking, no wonder he was banned from certain sections fo the forum.

I remember when he was explaining to me how profitable an s15 is he said that if you have one of the 1 million s15 forming of the global hashrate, when your pool mines a block you will also get 1/1mil of the reward, and obviously zero when it doesn't mine a block.  
Oh and the dams that can be built endlessly on every river because we can simply dig the river bed to sea level....

Best is to ignore him when it comes to his usual drama!
Too bad, if we ignore his segwit/LN/bitmain problems he is a decent guy.

Imho he is 100% against SegWit and LN as part of Bitcoin, hence he's trying to convince everybody (by all means!) that Bitcoin going in this direction is a mistake. This sums it up.

I'm not sure about other statement since i'm not export nor fan of LN, but comparing BitRefill with HYIP scheme is very ridiculous.

if you go check that topic thread and read the post from above mine in that topic .. you now the one made by bitrefill.. you know the one you merited... you would read

'Channel rules are established between the two parties that enter them, it is voluntary. That means you can agree to any rules you want. If you use rules that are different than other LN wallets or the rest of the network, you will be limited to a subnetwork of people using the same rules. Turbo channel opening requires a custom channel, '

they are playing by their own rules to have the ability to open channels with millisat balance thats not pegged to a confirmed and locked bitcoin blockchain tx'

its bitrefill that should make it absolutely clear that people are accepting unbacked balance.
again shame on you for making it out the user is in the wrong for opening the channel

most users/consumers using these custom rule lite wallets. think its the same rules. think all LN millisats are backed. they are not coders or know how to check things. they just like many consumers blindly trust the PR thats been spouted out. again they are not coders. so yes they are unware of what they are agreeing to. but agree anyway because they are given millisats at a discount. they dont see they are given unbacked millisats

these wallets do not have a button of terms and conditions that in bold tell people that the balance is not pegged. it doesnt tell them the critical stuff.. its just a open channel to get milliats. and the person says yes they want them millisats.. without any consideration if those millisats are backed pegged to a real bitcoin confirmed tx lock of funds.

you are an absolute fool.
but its nice to know you admit now that you feel its ok to have unbacked balance in LN.. but shame your blaming the user for having unbacked balance by saying they agreed to it. you really dont care about users security or having a payment sstem thats as strong as what bitcoin is. total shame on you.

whats next blame users for being suckered into the HYIP schemes that are starting up in LN. do you have any moral/ethics to actually care about users experience and user risk. or are you just mr exagerated positive PR guy wanting to fame up LN under the FALSE pretense that its thought to be linked to bitcoin because people throw the buzzword around alot.

even thor turbo admits to this by saying their unbacked channels are customary and usually those accepting unbacked balance are using their software varient..