Author

Topic: Is it abuse t to flag a person "Minority Report" style? (Read 653 times)

member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
I said in my comment I'd remove the rating after you repay your loans. I flagged you to prevent any further losses should you decide to skip town with the coins. Payment is due on your two existing loans today, so your neg rating with either be removed today or will stay forever. It's up to you.

Edit: I see for https://btcjam.com/listings/6823 you specified the beginning of November for payback, so that's still a month out. I'll gladly remove the cautionary warning after you've paid back your loans you currently have out.

This looks reasonable to me. If you don't pay your loan, then of course you should be flag for others to know for the trust system.
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1222
brb keeping up with the Kardashians
Seems we are kinda moving off the topic.  Or am I to take it that it is OK to flag people early?

That's what the Trust system is there for. You're not tagged as a scammer (there's actually a special tag for that), so the rating is merely a cautionary sign.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
Seems we are kinda moving off the topic.  Or am I to take it that it is OK to flag people early?

Yes, if the warning signs are there.

There is no issue - he will remove the rep when you pay off a loan. 
jr. member
Activity: 47
Merit: 1
Seems we are kinda moving off the topic.  Or am I to take it that it is OK to flag people early?
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 504
always the student, never the master.
I agree: you should repay your previous loans before asking for new ones...

i second this motion. it must be nice to get all these loans
full member
Activity: 252
Merit: 100
MARKETPLACE FOR PAID ADVICE LIVE BROADCASTS
I agree: you should repay your previous loans before asking for new ones...
jr. member
Activity: 47
Merit: 1
Your wrong tomatocage.  The two loans are due November 1st.  Now because of the negative comment,  I might get to miss out on a great deal going on at bitmit.com.   I have two block erupter blades on order, and was hoping to get 2 more to add to my mining rigs.  Now since I have been flagged I may not get the loan.

I'm not really crying about it.  Just wondering if anyone else believes that this is a little too aggressive.  Some people are legitimately trying to run a business, and are looking to establish positive feedback.  I thrive on positive feedback.
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1222
brb keeping up with the Kardashians
I said in my comment I'd remove the rating after you repay your loans. I flagged you to prevent any further losses should you decide to skip town with the coins. Payment is due on your two existing loans today, so your neg rating with either be removed today or will stay forever. It's up to you.

Edit: I see for https://btcjam.com/listings/6823 you specified the beginning of November for payback, so that's still a month out. I'll gladly remove the cautionary warning after you've paid back your loans you currently have out.
full member
Activity: 252
Merit: 100
MARKETPLACE FOR PAID ADVICE LIVE BROADCASTS
It is unfair but it is how the trust system works.
If you want, you can make a thread in the meta subforum.


Or cry with: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/someone-lowered-my-trust-i-dont-know-why-what-recourse-303613
jr. member
Activity: 47
Merit: 1
A week ago I was flagged by some people, and received a negative comment from tomatocage for a post topic that I created.  tomatocage has a great reputation, and seems to spot scammers very well.  However, does anyone else believe that this is just a little aggressive?

Does anyone else believe that its wrong to flag people before they have done anything to deserve it?
Jump to: