Topic: Is it I desreves a negative trust? (Read 289 times)
No one's trying to convince you.No one cares what were your intentions before making that comment ,you may or may not be innocent.Only person you should be explaining things to is the one that gave you negative feedback.If you are waiting here to get 'convinced',it's never happening.Get used to live with the red.
A warning could be enough...basically... But people are abusing the forum to a very high level, to say the least. It's like with children when you told them to behave correctly but they don't want to listen to you (bad kitties), and so you need to be severe.
Now taking your case as an example, if you have a business that you promote here and figure that your competitors are buying fake posts to bump their topic, how fair do you think it is for you?
When you are a decent member of any forum and have a correct attitude and courtesy you don't even need to read the forum rules usually.
You can think to give you a negative feedback is rude but blame all other members who are doing the mess
Now taking your case as an example, if you have a business that you promote here and figure that your competitors are buying fake posts to bump their topic, how fair do you think it is for you?
When you are a decent member of any forum and have a correct attitude and courtesy you don't even need to read the forum rules usually.
You can think to give you a negative feedback is rude but blame all other members who are doing the mess
Just because you didn't do it does not mean you are innocent. You had the intent to bump ANN threads and that in and of itself directly shows justification for the negative trust.
But I never broke the rules that got paid for bumping the ANN threads,I didn't have intent to bump the ANN threads I am just trapped by the OP when I am not aware of the rules.
You can see my history I never posted on ANN threads so which means I never broke the rules of the forum.
I invite Mrs.Lauda to answer my thread.
Even if you didn't break the rules, you intended on doing so.
Which makes you in my, and in many other people's eyes untrustworthy.
The rating isn't given because you broke any forum rules, nor is it given by someone who is a forum administrator, it is simply given by someone who thinks you're untrustworthy.
"Now anyone who willingly/is willing breaks the forum rules by post bumping in ANN section in exchange for money will be rewarded with a red tag"
FTFY
Just because you didn't do it does not mean you are innocent. You had the intent to bump ANN threads and that in and of itself directly shows justification for the negative trust.
But I never broke the rules that got paid for bumping the ANN threads,I didn't have intent to bump the ANN threads I am just trapped by the OP when I am not aware of the rules.
You can see my history I never posted on ANN threads so which means I never broke the rules of the forum.
I invite Mrs.Lauda to answer my thread.
Yesterday,I found that I got negative trust from one of the DT member of the forum for providing ANN bump services.I found my name here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ico-spammers-exposed-new-self-moderated-thread-2502431
But I never posted in ANN threads so I think I don't deserve this negative trust.I agree that I replied to the OP who asked ANN bump needed,but at that time I am very new to the forum didn't realize about the forum rules fully.But later I realize that it is against forum rules and stopped responding to the shit like this.
For only responding to the OP who asked ANN bump deserves a negative trust?
If yes,I respect the decision of the DT member.Thank you.
But I never posted in ANN threads so I think I don't deserve this negative trust.I agree that I replied to the OP who asked ANN bump needed,but at that time I am very new to the forum didn't realize about the forum rules fully.But later I realize that it is against forum rules and stopped responding to the shit like this.
For only responding to the OP who asked ANN bump deserves a negative trust?
If yes,I respect the decision of the DT member.Thank you.
I feel sorry for you brother. But DT members dont have eyes and heart to listen
Now anyone who will Post in ANN, will be considered as a Red tag. lolzz
I'll repeat what I said to the other user that created a similar thread and used similar arguments.
Just because you didn't do it does not mean you are innocent. You had the intent to bump ANN threads and that in and of itself directly shows justification for the negative trust.
Key point in refuting your 'new to the forum' argument: ignorantia legis neminem excusat. Just because you didn't know the rules does not mean that you are getting away scot-free. That just simply does not make sense. And it's not like the rules were private knowledge. They're posted publicly, for god's sake!
Just because you didn't do it does not mean you are innocent. You had the intent to bump ANN threads and that in and of itself directly shows justification for the negative trust.
Key point in refuting your 'new to the forum' argument: ignorantia legis neminem excusat. Just because you didn't know the rules does not mean that you are getting away scot-free. That just simply does not make sense. And it's not like the rules were private knowledge. They're posted publicly, for god's sake!
Stop repeating the same to every member. everyone know you are shit poster
I'll repeat what I said to the other user that created a similar thread and used similar arguments.
Just because you didn't do it does not mean you are innocent. You had the intent to bump ANN threads and that in and of itself directly shows justification for the negative trust.
Key point in refuting your 'new to the forum' argument: ignorantia legis neminem excusat. Just because you didn't know the rules does not mean that you are getting away scot-free. That just simply does not make sense. And it's not like the rules were private knowledge. They're posted publicly, for god's sake!
Just because you didn't do it does not mean you are innocent. You had the intent to bump ANN threads and that in and of itself directly shows justification for the negative trust.
Key point in refuting your 'new to the forum' argument: ignorantia legis neminem excusat. Just because you didn't know the rules does not mean that you are getting away scot-free. That just simply does not make sense. And it's not like the rules were private knowledge. They're posted publicly, for god's sake!
Yesterday,I found that I got negative trust from one of the DT member of the forum for providing ANN bump services.I found my name here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ico-spammers-exposed-new-self-moderated-thread-2502431
But I never posted in ANN threads so I think I don't deserve this negative trust.I agree that I replied to the OP who asked ANN bump needed,but at that time I am very new to the forum didn't realize about the forum rules fully.But later I realize that it is against forum rules and stopped responding to the shit like this.
For only responding to the OP who asked ANN bump deserves a negative trust?
If yes,I respect the decision of the DT member.Thank you.
But I never posted in ANN threads so I think I don't deserve this negative trust.I agree that I replied to the OP who asked ANN bump needed,but at that time I am very new to the forum didn't realize about the forum rules fully.But later I realize that it is against forum rules and stopped responding to the shit like this.
For only responding to the OP who asked ANN bump deserves a negative trust?
If yes,I respect the decision of the DT member.Thank you.
Jump to: