Topic: Is it painless to control a multitude??? (Read 392 times)

In the modern government, I don't think a person has the responsibility, obligation and authority to control everything. So 'control a multitude' is not really a thing anymore. If you are an elected president, you have Legislative who already make the ground rules and budgeting for you to work on, all you need to do was running those ground rules, even after that you have many people helping you on each ministry so you just need to make sure that all those ministry are doing what you are planning, even when you are supervising your ministry it is also helped by Judicial.

I don't mean to say it's easy, but I don't think it will be some pain. If it's true than people would be forced to become the head of government, but the reality now people are racing to be the head of the government.

In a democratic system where a leader comes out on his/her own to run for a position in a gathering. That means they have looked upon them self and believe that they are equal to the task. It's not a compulsory mandate. 
 
All of us both leaders and the followers have what we don't want others to know about us, for the purpose of always trying to lead and not letting people worry about you, it will be best for one to always resolve and settle things which concern his/her personal life on their own without even bringing out to the public observation. 
 
Most times handling some kind of public Borden's how to make the right decision and all that is enough to put someone in an unstable state, but that's not left for us to worry about for anyone who chooses to rule is already aware of what's to happen and the task that comes with ruling which doesn't not just end in seating in an office and signing some papers. 

It's not an easy job at all to be the number citizen and head of any government, it's one that demands more of a servant than a leader because a good servant makes a good leader. But let's not forget all the countless incentives that comes with being the leader of a country.

also the running of the country can not be possible without the masses and the general public everyone actually have their part to play in all this. And with many government being corrupt it's not becoming easier to be head of affairs than be an ordinary citizens. Only good and passionate leaders can step out to talk about how difficult the job is.

We recommend that you improve your writing pattern so that it is neater and easier for many people to understand because I see that your writing is messy. Don't be offended it's just a suggestion and input only.

There are many examples of regional heads or government leaders who, when their term of office ends, experience a life that is quite simple and different from most leaders. What can we conclude from the many different stories that end when they become leaders. If they are not corrupt then the wealth will not exceed the limits of the salary and benefits of most leaders usually and the simple life after leading is a reflection of a just and wise leader.

All that remains is to do a study of how your country's leaders were after they came to power and also see what businesses they developed after or before becoming a leader, so we will get an idea of where the wealth they got came from. Corruption is a very unethical act and most people involved in government are generally caught in corruption cases, although we cannot say 100% of them.

Basically humans will always face problems, but what makes the difference is the level of problems a person faces, and also everyone has a different opinion about the same problem. For example, I may feel very heavy when facing problem A, and it may not be difficult for other people, and vice versa.

A leader certainly knows the consequences when he has to lead a group or organization, even at a larger level, namely leading the country. He knew what he was going to get, be it good things or bad things, and certainly before he stepped forward to become their leader they must have been very prepared with everything, even things related to his safety.
But what bad things will they get, oh definitely not, because everything goes hand in hand, for example when a leader will very often be faced with things that threaten his safety then he has been prepared with something that guarantees his safety.

Do you want to be at the top or bottom of the masses? Nothing is easy, those people they are ruling over too are not having it easy, let me tell you when money is out of your problem and you have the power to control people you almost have it all. They are elected to make decisions and stir their nation to a prosperous life, there will be issue this is true but most of the time these problems are self-made because of greed, when they get to the top they will start compromising and stealing the commonwealth. I will rather be at the top than the bottom

Leadership is a skills and some individuals are born with the abilities of leadership. For those born with those gifts, leading won't be painful to them. They'll lead so easily and people will enjoy their leadership but if those individuals that aren't born with that gift but got elected due to their popularity or force their way into office, they'll find it stressful to lead. As a leader you have to scarify somethings that'll make life uncomfortable for you.

You have to put on a smile always unless in situations when it demands you look serious or angry but at most time you have to be very friendly. You can make your leadership enjoyable or stressful, everything is in your hands as how you lead your followers determined how they respond.

Position has not guaranteed peace in our lives, although many people want to be one of the respected people in a region or country, and they are always supervised by certain parties for their security in living life, but do not think that they do not have any problems even though they already have a large salary but problems in life certainly exist, Even the problems they face are bigger than those of us who are just ordinary people, even though we complain a lot but they are also the same, there is no 100% comfort and we have our own problems, so just live it and everything must have a way out.

I understand the points you are referring to. The right leadership can bring certain benefits and power. However, Power also comes with responsibility, and the right and responsible use of power is very important. Leaders in politics, business or in any field, should make decisions and act based on the common good and sustainable development of all. Using power for personal gain or evil is not only irresponsible, but can also harm people and cause protests.

Leaders should also treat everyone fairly and with respect, regardless of their social position or qualifications. Working with lowly people in a respectful and encouraging manner creates a positive and motivating environment for individual and collective growth.

However, pressure from people and leadership responsibilities are inevitable. Leaders must be willing to take on the responsibility and mindset to deal with these pressures and challenges. This requires courage and the ability to make decisions through deliberate thought and listening.

Leadership roles comes with responsibility and the higher the position the higher the responsibility demanded of you. Many leaders we see on TV screens with a decorated smile are passing through some occupied stress that they don't have time for themselves despite the money and power that's involved with such position sometimes they which to be like the ordinary man with a normal daily life.

A former president of Nigeria Dr. Goodluck E. Jonathon while still a president you can clearly see so much of grey hairs all over his head throughout the time of his administration but few months after his administration came to an end and he handed power to his successor, those grey hair on his head disappeared, he now looks younger with extra weight gain. That's to tell us that leading people isn't an easy task especially when you're poised to act as a good and productive leader.

Being a leader isn't a walk in the park! They may seem all smiles in public, but the challenges they face can be overwhelming. Take our country's leaders, for instance – they carry enormous responsibilities. As for me, I used to think leaders lived without a worry, but it's not that simple. Even with material wealth, they can still face struggles.

Firstly, this post shouldn't be here, because it's a political discussion (issue), if you can move the thread to politics and society it will be nice and you will have more than enough reply that will keep the thread at the top page. About your discussion, everyone knows that it's always difficult to control human beings because everyone have his/her own mentality (thinking faculty) so you are the capital of a ship and you gives an other to 10 persons 8 will do according to your instructions and the rest 2 persons will not, why? Because they will think you are not up to their age or standard and this will always cause commotion, so is isn't easy to control multitude but with only one stick of the Cain you can control thausand of animal.
The conclusion to my comenet is that animals are more easy to control than humans.

It is true that everyone has there own problem but do nit make we sense when a leader carries there own family problems to inflict on people wrongly. I can remember my teacher when I was a kid then, sometimes she comes to class with anger and inflict us with her mood which always turn out toxic to us. We do see her as an emotional woman because she always carries her family problem with her which has a great influence on her. We need to learn how to avoid emotional feeling on people around us because it can have greater effe CTS on us and jeopardize our own reputation.

The leadership position surely give the wealth and power.Sometimes it won’t give you the wealth by the bad ways,but surely it will gives you power.If you use the power in the correct way,you can easily earn some wealth from it.Even you are leader,you should not show your attitude towards the low people.The pressure from the people can’t be handle easily,because you are directly responsible to answer the people.

You have to admit that a politician is multifaceted. They are as changeable as chameleons. A political leader shows various tricks to the public to achieve his interests. However, not everyone is qualified to be a leader in the political arena. There are many unqualified people in our society. Those who want to be leaders and once elected, without considering the people's side. He started misusing the power to fulfill his interests. An ideal politician never puts his own interests first. To be an ideal leader, one must understand the inner feelings of the people. It is not so easy to be an ideal politician in the current context

What we see with our own eyes is not always true. No, if a person smiles in front of everyone, then we will be wrong if we think he is a happy person, because many people keep your pain in their chest and walk happily. As you said, when a politician comes in front of people, he is always cheerful, that is, he interacts very nicely with everyone, so we don't think that person who is involved in politics may be very happy. I thought he was happy but he is not that happy. So one should never judge a person by his outward appearance.

Well you are somehow right about the corruption thing and that's really happening everywhere these days. The leaders who have political power and are in a good rank at any government sector are misusing their powers for material things. You thought that those leaders earn money legally because they have power however you later found out that they were accumulating the money only with the help of corruption. That's now a days a fact in the world of politics because almost any rich politician who is a democrat earns money with malicious ways because they can't make that much money fairly. Unfortunately, many people want to join government sector only for material desires, and they don't care about public.

The ones who follow non-corrupt ways are often the ones who face hardships in governmental sector because they will always be pressurized to allow corrupt things otherwise they will be destroyed. I believe that fictional movies often show the reality of the real world because they often show us in the form of movies that how a good democrat is destroyed, and they also show us that the ones who didn't follow the orders of the government could face way hard times. The governmental sector is truly a hard job for anyone, and if they are very transparent then they will either be out of job or they won't be able to play their role the way the wanted to play.

People often think that leadership positions bring wealth and power, but the reality can be different and more complicated. Corruption is a common problem in many countries, and as you have stated, some leaders can lead a miserable life despite their appearance of success and wealth. We tend to look at the surface of the iceberg without knowing what's really underneath, just as we aren't really capable of knowing what people do let alone say anything to the story can understand and judge anyone. There may be systemic problems, policy challenges, corruption or pressure from the public and the public. It is often seen that the mask of success is still a lot of distant burdens that leaders must bear.

Every time it comes time to elect a new leader, the richest people will come forward as candidates. My question is: Why did they want to be the leader and why did they spend a lot of money to get the position? Today's leaders, particularly politicians, don't have any problems or are facing any problems at all. Before passing judgment on those who claimed that the leaders are incredibly wicked, I believe we should consider this issue.
If we look at some countries, the leaders don't have time to help the people who fought to elect them; all they care about is their pockets and their families, and it will be very challenging to see their families in the country where they are chosen as a leader because all of their families will be residing in another country.

This, the person at the top of a country or a big company hardly takes any decision at all, they are the ones with the responsibility to take the blame if something goes wrong but that is it.

The decisions are taken by other people which can be part of the government or which are incredibly influential due to their money, and more than anything they want to keep the status quo as they benefit from it, this is why in almost all countries governments oppose directly or indirectly the adoption of bitcoin, as the benefits they can get out of their fiat currencies are threatened due to the existence of bitcoin.

They think that governing the country is easy, so many people want to be elected. When they are elected they realize that being a leader is not an easy thing. Besides having to think, a leader must know how the conditions and feelings of his people. It's not easy to manage a lot of people, because everyone has different characteristics, some are bad, some are good. Some agree with the government, some don't. Leaders must have a high sense of responsibility.

The problem is that the leader is not autonomous in his decisions. Often decisions are made instead of him, and he is only a "scapegoat" who takes responsibility. It should be understood that if you go against the system, the leader can always be replaced by a double. Is he worth envying? I think not.

Maybe it's a bit telling that studies have shown a disproportionate amount of people in leadership positions have psychopathic tendencies, whether they have them to start with or simply end up with them after reaching these positions, who knows. It is definitely stressful being at the top of the chain because lots of people rely on you in many cases, whether in business or when running the country. However they often receive rather outsized rewards for being in this position so maybe don't be feeling too guilty towards them. Power can be a dangerous thing for some people as well, as it can be very corrupting when it is unmonitored or enforcement of boundaries is lacking.

Your insights lay bare the immense strains and duties carried by leaders, particularly in politics. This burden, often concealed behind public images, frequently results in the ethical dilemmas plaguing modern politics.

You've raised an intriguing point about corruption. While it's generally linked with greed, it can be seen as an offshoot of the colossal pressures intrinsic to leadership. Amid an atmosphere where tangible results denote success, leaders may resort to unscrupulous means to fulfill their roles.

Your metaphor of "closing our eyes to see this little thing" is a striking paradox embodying this intricate issue. It hints that we must delve deeper, past the headlines, to truly grasp the hardships of leadership. As closing our eyes heightens other senses, distancing ourselves from political drama might offer a sharper understanding of the challenges leaders confront.

The state of institutions is what makes the leader an ordinary individual and an employee in the state whose work ends with the end of his term of office and then returns to practice his normal life and normal occupations. The absence of a state of institutions separated by powers protected by the constitution is what makes corruption widespread in the state and enables the authority of the army, the mafia or armed militias.

the leader must take care of the existence of healthy institutions and opposition, otherwise he will suffer from fear and anxiety about the possibility that someone will seize power by force.

And there you can find the difference between Politics and Leadership. As an old quote says, great power comes with great responsibility. Then and only then being a leader of a country has power over the government, military, and system. This requires a great deal of responsibility to keep the country's sustainability of needs, economy, and peace.

Of course, power towards other nations and connections to other organizations are necessary for being a leader of a country but only secondary. What is needed for a leader is integrity. However it is not enough, because even the leader is true to his responsibilities, corruption occurs on their subordinates, lawmakers, and cabinet members.

It should be abit easy for them as they are controlled, or they are always told what to do like animals in zoo... then they pretend to be in charge when speaking to the media and others. ... It's more like being a conveyor belt for a pre-planned work in a system. The one who planned the work is in the dark watching the activities of his salves/leaders. The moment the leaders start doing things on their own it becomes really difficult and dangerous for them. The system typically fights back without mercy.

Corruption isnt something that we could really be able to remove out in todays society or simply speaking about the reality on which to those who had been sitting into those positions would really be having the power and rules on which they could really be able to take advantage if they do really wanted and this is where it starts on misused taxes and other correlated things which in regards to money of people. If it wasnt been applied on the right place then for sure it would really be that applied into their pocket, which it is indeed the reality.  I do rather prefer on seeing a leader whose really be that being silent but when it comes to changes and
things that had been done on the country or a certain city or whatsoever did really make out that notable progress on which this is what we do really like to have and not into those people who do really
just simply spamming out those sweet words and promises on what are the things that they would really be planning to do. This is why its always recommended that we should really vote for the right people.

It is just confusing because the title of the thread is 100% different from what the OP is talking about in the body.i had always thought that naming a post is not a big problem. I have read once where someone was explaining tips to title your post, I thought it wasn't needed because title of a post should come naturally. Little did I know that it will still be an issue to dome people.

Two reasons why these leaders are always running during the elections;

1. They have a genuine heart to serve their people.
2. Just some intention if ever they win, they have a personal interest that will be easier to fulfill on that position.

Well, we're all grown ups and we do know that some of these leaders are up for their personal interests. I am not ignoring those genuine leaders that has their genuine heart ready to help their people, these are the type of leaders that are not heartless. I do see some points that there's this genuine leader but because of the people that are surrounding him, he's being taken away to the heart of service and change their route into serving a few for the benefit of himself and those that have pulled him away to the people.

This is where we looks at the qualities of a good leader when it comes of controlling his people and public he must be focused and strick, the ability for you to comfort yourself and compose in the public makes you an elderly person and a true leader.
As leader they are not that they are all comfortable with the condition they found themselves but they most no make it noticeable to others irrespective of predicaments they always maintained their statusquo  and reputation and dignity.

I don't know if your context tries to express that all politicians are corrupt, but happy and that they achieve their goals based on their leadership capacity, well there is nothing new there, it happens and unfortunately it will continue to happen.

The positive thing is that there are few political leaders in the plane of evil, but generally they only have empathy, a quality of the leader, but it does not mean that they are leaders.

The solution is complex, but all that remains is the ability to not elect them, it is easy to write it, these false leaders are re-elected over and over again.

There are several types of leadership, some of them tend to lead by force or coercion, and they depend on forcing others to submit to you. This type of leadership is based on frightening the people and they will obey you, but soon you will end up facing the people in the form of demonstrations or armed disobedience.Leadership that comes with cooperation and consultation is better, and in which everyone can favor the leader if he erred.

Your illustration about leadership only happens in an ideal situation. Leadership is a call to service and not to oppress or enrich. A good leader will always sacrifice for his followers to have a good life. When a leader is appointed he is supposed to be sober because of the enormous responsibility placed on him as the leader. But I am sorry because selfless leaders have become scarce globally.

Currently, most leaders don't care about the masses because their target is to loot the treasury of the country. The struggle for political power currently is not based on the willingness to serve but on a preplanned plot to enrich themselves and impoverish the masses. In some advanced nations, the level of stealing in government is not as widespread as what happens in developing nations.
 
It is also true that money alone will not bring joy or fulfillment but everybody needs money to survive in this current society. We need money to take care of our basic needs. These corrupt leaders might not have all that makes them happy but they have also stolen resources that would have made people comfortable.

There is always some form of pain to endure when dealing with people, mostly when they are more than one. Leadership is a a responsibility that can even even oversea four person in a group.

There is pain trust me. The noise of how best it should be never ceases. The envy, the backbiting all adds up, but the person who is in control is mostly known for the calm, focus and attention to duty that is directed toward the common goal. The sacrifice is there and it is always noted by the followers covertly.

The true leader in the multitude will always bear more brunt than the multitude who stump down the gate.
 

Apart from the royalties where the throne is passed on to the next in link. A democratic government is contested for. It's one that no one has an automatic claim to except for dictators.

In a civilized country when you want to run for any office you make your Intentions clear. With your party election and then start campaign for the election properly all this are steps and process that was not forced on you. You saw your self fit for the role and you went for it but unfortunately it wasn't you expectations. I believe you just have to deal with it.

First, move this thread to Politics and society, then you can have a betterment discussion. In my knowledge, humans are not easily controlled because everyone would want to exercise their rights and freedom the way it suits them, which could be against another right or harm them. So, leaders are also putting in their efforts and trying to do their best, which they feel could satisfy the interests of their citizens.


Cheers 🥂, Dr.Bitcoin_Strange 👺👺

If leadership is not comfortable for political leaders why are they rushing to the sit to get elected? Leadership should be something that people rejects and ignore because of the responsibility they will put themselves into but that's not the case I guess.

There is a greater burden for leaders but that's only if they are going there to do something for the country anyway, most of them politicians are aiming for that higher sit for their selfish reasons and gains (MONEY), let's not forget the allowance these leaders are getting per month.

It is true that true that political leaders and leaders in general have their own individual problems just like everyone else, but it’s also important to know that regardless of the problems or challenges they face, they willingly chose their roles and responsibilities. They signed up for it, especially political leaders. Yes, leadership comes with its difficulties and expectations but it’s still a voluntary thing and they must accept the accountability that accompanies them. also, as much as we know that leaders also have their individual cross to carry, we shouldn't forget that there are major benefits they stand to gain by the virtue of the position in which they assume.
Nevertheless, GOOD Leaders are great people yes, they also feel pain, and I beleive anyone leading deligently, nature has its way of catering for them.

I will use the government sector as an example whenever I see a leader I do believe that it is not comfortable for him all the time, you may  always see him smile in public but the hardships he is encountering can be destructive, taking about our leaders in the country most of the moments thing may go hard on them but they still take uptheire responsibility as a superintendent of thatcountryy to protect and provide for them, let me use my self as an illustration when I was younger I thought that when someone is been chosen as a head
 thatmeansn he is wealthy and riches and powerful and will live a life of no suffering in his generation  but it was more than that, one can have this material thing but still not have it all, most of the time this word is a called corruption
Closing our eyes for us to see this little thing.