This is discussed in detail here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=279249.0;topicseen
And funded here:
3M8XGFBKwkf7miBzpkU3x2DoWwAVrD1mhk
Topic: Is it possible to implement tumbling inside Bitcoin itself? (Read 865 times)
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2713
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Would we still be able to exhibit the source address, or am I misunderstanding Tumbling??
I think the point of tumbling is so nobody will know where the money went.
ah i see. that sounds great. i think it's kind of creepy how everyone's transaction record is visible. should be encrypted and shit
Yeah, not exactly untraceable like the media point out. I think there are programs being worked on that are built on top of the blockchain for stuff like this though.
Would we still be able to exhibit the source address, or am I misunderstanding Tumbling??
I think the point of tumbling is so nobody will know where the money went.
ah i see. that sounds great. i think it's kind of creepy how everyone's transaction record is visible. should be encrypted and shit
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2713
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Would we still be able to exhibit the source address, or am I misunderstanding Tumbling??
I think the point of tumbling is so nobody will know where the money went.
Would we still be able to exhibit the source address, or am I misunderstanding Tumbling??
Any idea why it was denied? Or any links? Thanks.
Mandatory transaction mixing has been considered in the past and denied. CoinJoin obfuscates the transaction graph in a similar way though.
Consider if every time a new block is mined, the transaction inputs are sent to the outputs in such a way that each output receives a proportional amount from each input. Would this adequately tumble the coins, or would the increase in transactions bloat the blockchain?
Jump to: